- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 16,307
- Reaction score
- 7,752
We all have favoritisms towards certain fighters but the only common thing that brings us together to this site is the love of watching MMA. There are things, however, that makes it almost impossible not to get triggered and also make me feel like I want to puke at the lack of admission to the facts. Here is one of the examples that makes it extremely hard to even try to debate on this site:
When DC literally and intentionally jabbed Stipe in eye as this gif shows clearly
DC’s biased fans say it didn’t effect the outcome of the fight because the KO came much later!
Then you show them this gif
Right before the KO happened and then they say it doesn’t matter he would still have KO’d him anyway!
Really, so getting jabbed in your eyes doesn’t effect your vision and your focus process at all now?
I could write a whole book on the lack of comprehension and the state of denials but I will let you do your part.
So my question is how can you reason with these fans?
When DC literally and intentionally jabbed Stipe in eye as this gif shows clearly
DC’s biased fans say it didn’t effect the outcome of the fight because the KO came much later!
Then you show them this gif
Right before the KO happened and then they say it doesn’t matter he would still have KO’d him anyway!
Really, so getting jabbed in your eyes doesn’t effect your vision and your focus process at all now?
I could write a whole book on the lack of comprehension and the state of denials but I will let you do your part.
So my question is how can you reason with these fans?
Last edited: