LitteringAnd
Purple Belt
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2010
- Messages
- 1,727
- Reaction score
- 0
It was Swole day, didn't even have to wear my wifebeater today.
[YT]QWfbGGZE07M[/YT]
Nice swole work brah. I intend to get my swole on in 2013 as well.
It was Swole day, didn't even have to wear my wifebeater today.
[YT]QWfbGGZE07M[/YT]
Nice swole work brah. I intend to get my swole on in 2013 as well.
Why is everybody getting swole next year?!
Because of after Game of Death(Lifts)finishes on July 1st, the next Comp is Bench and Curlz, brah!:icon_chee
Why is everybody getting swole next year?!
Because judicious hypertrophy work creates conditions for more successful strength work. A muscle that's bigger has greater potential to get stronger, and a muscle that does't fatigue as easily can train harder, and recover faster.
Because judicious hypertrophy work creates conditions for more successful strength work. A muscle that's bigger has greater potential to get stronger, and a muscle that does't fatigue as easily can train harder, and recover faster.
I think it might be because we like being swole. Swolers gonna swole, y'know.
I am aware of that and it's why I'll be incorporating it, but a little swolertrophy seems to be trendy these days. Especially as New Year's resolution...
Because judicious hypertrophy work creates conditions for more successful strength work. A muscle that's bigger has greater potential to get stronger, and a muscle that does't fatigue as easily can train harder, and recover faster.
Maybe as a whole we're maturing, and can have moved past the whole "only big compound barbell lifts done heavy" as an overreaction to, and to separate ourselves from, the gym idiots. And now we can feel much more comfortable with including some brotastic exercises. Hell, I'm even going to be giving leg press a try. Madness.
Am I right in saying that hypertorphy is, as far as actual training is concerned, a function of Volume rather than Reps?
For example, Wendler's Boring But Big is 5X10, while Chad Wesley Smith's Inverted Juggernaut Method is 10X5. But the results would be the same, yes?
Yes. I'd say total volume / time, assuming intensity is sufficient, would be the way to sum it up. So to use your above example, 10x5 or 5x10 would be the same, if they're done in the same amount of time.
[Tangent] Now to be fair, Miaou would disagree about the time aspect, because there isn't a satisfactory study supporting it. But I think that there's reason enough to believe it's a factor - it's in both "Supertraining" and "Science and Practice", it fits with what's known and believed to be most likely regarding hypertrophy, and there's plenty of anecdotal evidence. So I think that's it's reasonable to believe and train, as if time is a factor, until there's evidence to show otherwise.[/Tangent]
Now to be fair, Miaou would disagree about the time aspect, because there isn't a satisfactory study supporting it. But I think that there's reason enough to believe it's a factor - it's in both "Supertraining" and "Science and Practice", it fits with what's known and believed to be most likely regarding hypertrophy, and there's plenty of anecdotal evidence. So I think that's it's reasonable to believe and train, as if time is a factor, until there's evidence to show otherwise.
Still not convinced, especially not as far as contractile muscle protein increase is concerned. Thanks for being fair, though!
Can you mention the chapter this is mentioned in in Supertraining?
belph getting swole!
I demand pictures (newdz) in 2013 belph
Clean
Fucking blew. My back and legs are fried like hell.Barely stood with 80. I decided I'd squat and do my best.
Squat(lbs)
212x5
255x4
296 2x3
340 4x3
340 x 2
Fuck. Really awful day. I' going to try and relax tomorrow and Monday. Eat some good food and hopefully come back strong. Oh and to not have a sore ass.