- Joined
- Dec 16, 2015
- Messages
- 45,244
- Reaction score
- 6,619
I think they do some solid shit. Watch this video and tell me it’s not spot on:
Touché
I think they do some solid shit. Watch this video and tell me it’s not spot on:
I like when Steven Oh gave Hillary 100 percent chance of winning at the beginning of the election night / TYT coverage and then by the end of the night Cenk and Dore went on a tirade on msm saying they gave hillary way too much credit and people false hope by saying hillary was guaranteed to win.
I like when far lefties lose their shit, downright comical every time.
I like when Steven Oh gave Hillary 100 percent chance of winning at the beginning of the election night / TYT coverage and then by the end of the night Cenk and Dore went on a tirade on msm saying they gave hillary way too much credit and people false hope by saying hillary was guaranteed to win.
I like when far lefties lose their shit, downright comical every time.
Tbf, YouTube channels don't have a fraction of a fraction of the resources the MSM has. They rely on the MSM media for much, if not all, of their information; they just reinterpret it. There were very few objective voices predicting Trump would win.
So when Stephen Oh proclaims something as certainty without citing msm, and then the channel he is a c level at berates msm for doing what TYT did, it's a tbf moment?
How did Steve Oh come to the conclusion that Hillary Clinton was going to win by a landslide?
And declaring a victory for Clinton on TYT on election day isn't the same thing as the MSM predicting an election victory for weeks.
I appreciate the irony, but its really a false equivalence.
Ask him. And I have no idea how long he predicted it outside of election night -- I only watched yty then.
But, ragging on msm for doing exactly what they did is hypocrisy, not false equivalency.
He could've used silvers and others models - in fact, I can't think of one outlet that had her as a 100 certainty
100% picked Clinton to win and the majority by a fookin' landslide.
And it is a false equivalency when one is an ant and the other is an elephant. The resources are not in the same universe, nor is the power to influence.
I don't even watch TYT, but it seems like the guy is complaining about the poor reporting by the MSM to give a false sense of security to voters by calling it for Clinton early and often rather than conduct real journalism and report on whats going on in America. Not his last minute prediction.
No, it's still clear cut hypocrisy. You can't present a certainty without citing your sources and then pout and pass the buck when you're wrong.
And every left source was picking Clinton, including fringes like vox, salon, vice -- but they didn't get the blame.
There's just not "tbf" asterisk here - they made a claim as an axiom and then tried to blame everyone but themselves for doing what they also did.
I've never even seen this guy before, i thought he was somebody different. He's not even a pundit, he's the COO of TYT Network and he offered his opinion on who would win the election on election day. Its a huge difference; its not hypocrisy, its a false equivalency.
My kind? I voted for Gore, Kerry, and Obama twice. I will admit that I have drifted a little further right, but I do not consider my-self a conservative. I just call it how I see it.
The public should fear your kind more than "antifa".
I loled at this post more than I should have.TYT is basically a glorified reaction channel. They find a few clips of conservatives saying silly things or a wacky religious guy and give their thoughts on it. They are like the reply girls who were banned from YouTube some years ago who would show cleavage while commenting on a popular video.
Of course it did. The dems know that if they start losing the black vote, they're fucked.All I know is that the hysteria about "Trump encouraging white supremacism" turned out to be another bunch of horseshit.
How is it horse shit when he attacks black athletes for having an opinion, but defends Unite the Right racists in Charlottesville?All I know is that the hysteria about "Trump encouraging white supremacism" turned out to be another bunch of horseshit.
Yeah, it's apparent they often do news stories without even researching them or very surface research at most. They hired some investigative journalists eventually, but let most if not all of them go. Jordan Chariton got #MeToo'd (one of the most BS cases too, right up there with Chris Hardwick) and fired. Nomiki Konst was also fired. As well as Michael Tracey. Tracey was actually smeared by Cenk while he worked with TYT because Tracey was skeptical of the Trump-Russia collusion angle and how a lot of left-wing outlets like TYT covered the story. There was one episode where Tracey debated Cenk and Nomiki (as well as Jordan) and kept his cool while they viciously attacked him (not so much Jordan).
has TYT ever reported something original? They seem to just parrot other news organizations. Lazy ass news organization.
Yeah, I addressed that earlier. Fortunately Jones seems to be on the outs now with the White House, and perhaps he was never really in, but it's scary and a sign of the times that Trump at the very least used his large audience and lent him more credibility than he deserves.President Trump did an interview with... Alex Jones...