Opinion The War Room Bet Thread V8

Best bet(s) settled in the last bet thread (see closed bets section in post 3)

  • Bet 61 Jack V Savage v. Diogenes of Sinope

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 71 ColemanwastheGOAT v. CatchnShoot

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 68 Hdfi v. Andy Capp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 72 Source v. Andy Capp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 79 Mack Yancy v. Helden

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 75 Bwagster v. Andy Capp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bet 78 Kingz v. HOLA

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    6
#65. @Rob Battisti v. @Jack V Savage
1. Bitcoin will be at or above 50,000.00 on 12/31/2024 UTC
2. @Rob Battisti - For, @Jack V Savage - Against
3. 1/1/2025
4. Signature Bet
5. 6 months
6a. Google Finance will be used to verify the price (https://www.google.com/finance/quote/BTC-USD). The chart will need to show 50,000.00 or higher on 12/31/2024 UTC. The chart allows me to see the price throughout the day so if at any point, it is at or above 50,000.00, Rob Battisti would be the victor.
6b. A gentlemen's agreement is noted that the loser will do a hiatus from Sherdog War Room posting. 1 month if Rob Battisti loses, 2 months if Jack V Savage loses.
Winner: Rob Battisti
 

Not quite zero. There's a small chance the US fucks up its finances so badly that it ends up defaulting on its debt (officially or unofficially) and cut off from all sources of borrowing. The budget is thus balanced by default since the government can't spend anything without first collecting it.
 
Not quite zero. There's a small chance the US fucks up its finances so badly that it ends up defaulting on its debt (officially or unofficially) and cut off from all sources of borrowing. The budget is thus balanced by default since the government can't spend anything without first collecting it.
More chance of me hitting the lottery the same night that a prime Kate Beckinsale blows me on top of Mount Everest.
 
@Lead v. @The Diplomat
1. The Supreme Court will rule Donald Trump can run for a third term as President
2. @The Diplomat - for; @Lead - against
3. 1/30/28
4. Avatar bet
5. 3 months
6. A case doesn’t have to occur for the bet to have a winner. The premise is Trump will be able to run for a third term with SCOTUS ruling he can do so. If that happens, The Diplomat wins. If it doesn’t, Lead wins.
7. Arbiter - @HockeyBjj

Hockey would need to confirm he’s comfortable with the language above as well before it’s confirmed. I chose that date as we’d know by that point whether he decided to run with primaries and the court would’ve likely responded. Not that they need to have a case in order for me to win.
 
@Lead v. @The Diplomat
1. The Supreme Court will rule Donald Trump can run for a third term as President
2. @The Diplomat - for; @Lead - against
3. 1/30/28
4. Avatar bet
5. 3 months
6. A case doesn’t have to occur for the bet to have a winner. The premise is Trump will be able to run for a third term with SCOTUS ruling he can do so. If that happens, The Diplomat wins. If it doesn’t, Lead wins.
7. Arbiter - @HockeyBjj

Hockey would need to confirm he’s comfortable with the language above as well before it’s confirmed. I chose that date as we’d know by that point whether he decided to run with primaries and the court would’ve likely responded. Not that they need to have a case in order for me to win.
Gray area there but yeah I can arbitrate that

To be clear, if SC indicates he could run for a 3rd term, but no case is brought and Vance ends up running anyways, who would then win?

Move the date back tho. When did Kamala jump in? Have that be the resolution date.
 
Gray area there but yeah I can arbitrate that

To be clear, if SC indicates he could run for a 3rd term, but no case is brought and Vance ends up running anyways, who would then win?

Move the date back tho. When did Kamala jump in? Have that be the resolution date.

Unsure on the second paragraph. How would they indicate that? It being challenged and then refusing to hear the case?
 
@Err
@Lead

1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon: Trudeau will win the Canadian Federal Election in 2025.
2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement.
@ColemanwastheGOAT - FOR
@Err - AGAINST

3. The date the bet will be decided (this can become tentative based of the officiators call) when result is announced.
4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser: Signature bet.
5. The duration of the reward/punishment: 1 month.

@Lead This one's void now with Trudea humiliated and kicked out of Canadian politics.
 
I got a new one though:

1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon.

Either the Liberals or Conservatives will win a majority in the upcoming Canadian Federal Election.

2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
@ImCertainOfCirkunov for the liberals
@ColemanwastheGOAT for the conservatives

3. The date the bet will be decided (this can become tentative based of the officiators call)
The day after the upcoming Canadian Federal Election.


4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
Avatar bet.

5. The duration of the reward/punishment
1 month.

6 (OPTIONAL) A situation which makes the bet void that isn't clear with the content in 1 2.
Bet void if neither party wins a majority.

@Lead
 
I got a new one though:

1. The exact statement the bet is premised upon.

Either the Liberals or Conservatives will win a majority in the upcoming Canadian Federal Election.

2. Stance each poster is taking in regards to the statement
@ImCertainOfCirkunov for the liberals
@ColemanwastheGOAT for the conservatives

3. The date the bet will be decided (this can become tentative based of the officiators call)
The day after the upcoming Canadian Federal Election.


4. The reward/punishment for the winner/loser
Avatar bet.

5. The duration of the reward/punishment
1 month.

6 (OPTIONAL) A situation which makes the bet void that isn't clear with the content in 1 2.
Bet void if neither party wins a majority.

@Lead
Agreed 👍
 
Back
Top