Social The University of Kansas is offering a course titled, "Angry White Male Studies," next fall

[lifelessheap]

lol seriously. Their domain is too big. White people in general are boring. But the WR is like Noah's Ark of different types of angry dudes haphazardly trying to express themselves.

You are an angry, racist little man.

 

[brackis1]

Can you image the fucking freak show that signed up for this course?

lol obscure 200-level seminar at a Kansas University about angry white men's responses to civil rights for minorities and LGBT people, and of course some angry white dude runs off to "MAGAimg.net" to post a picture of some crossdressers in fucking England.
Literally nailing the course description to a T

 

[brackis1]

You are an angry, racist little man.

yeah it's the guy laughing at low class nobodies who is angry, not the guys crying bloody murder over a college class that considers the possibility some white bros could be batshit lunatics responding to their powerless education-free position in the world.

 

[S Class]

I'm self-hating? LOL I'm gloating about my socioeconomic and educational superiority in a thread where a bunch of nobodies, who apparently have never set foot in a social science class, cry about their persecution because 20 kids in Kansas will learn about people like them (angry white right wing bros).

This isn't a new subject tardzo lol
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23639102?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

No shit, your fellow white males are "getting angry" 'cause they're being treated like shit by their own kind, like what you're doing here. Even Ray Charles can see that. Have some dignity and stand up for your own people.

About the link with the Asian American Studies, I don't see what your point is. If they were perpetuating self-hate towards their own fellow Asians or racism to other people, then I'd disagree with them too.

 

[brackis1]

So piling on sexism to racism. We need to take a good academic look at liberal fragility, confirmation biases, echo chambers, and hypocrisy. We need to take a good look at how academia itself has undermined and cheapened terms like "racist". This is also a valid area of academic sociological exploration. Sociology dwells in these less important spaces where constructs like identity are fastidiously examined usually irrespective of narrative.

These truths don't justify double standards. Here is yet another.

You sound really smart and should undertake such a study.
Make sure to use the word 'Valid' a lot to support your thesis, that's how a thesis gets proved.

 

[nac386]

This is probably the most pernicious, and vile of ideologies regurgitated by the new left. and ironically, it's usually by white leftists. Most of whom have never stepped foot out of the USA.

@nac386 , what do you think when leftists and liberals repeat this mantra?

I don't buy into the notion that only the majority population can be racist. I also don't think it's a particularly interesting debate topic. I kind of just wish it would go away so that instead of getting hung up on semantics, we can focus on right vs wrong. Call it what you want, racism or not (I call it racism), if you pass harsh judgements on people by their race then you are in the wrong.

This thread is a good example of why most people sort of annoy me when it comes to politics. You have people playing the, "Oh boo hoo" role, which is helpful to absolutely nobody and only serves to piss people off. Or Then you have people who are rightfully criticizing the course title, but seemingly just shaking their fist at the sky and ranting about it instead of looking into the course description and explaining the outrage with any nuance. That is also annoying to me, and makes me uninteresting in participating in the discussion.

The first thing I did was Google the Professor. He's a white guy. I doubt he's a racist against white guys. I see he's written about 5 books on various subjects in the humanities, so this is also not his only focus. So then I read the course description, and the course description is nowhere near as inflammatory as the title suggests. The course seems to be focused on how the historically majority dominating class (white males in this case) in a society react to rapidly changing social structure. That is a very legitimate sociological area of study, and almost an obvious topic for rapidly modernizing world.

Does it need to be called "Angry White Male Studies"? No, I think that's overly sardonic and he should call it something less inflammatory. But is this guy's college course something that outrages me and that I find deeply racist and offensive? No, other than the title of the course I'm pretty indifferent about it and I think everybody else would be too. If a black professor had a class called "Angry Black Man Studies" I would be equally indifferent. There are historical and sociological aspects to these things that really could be explored academically.

 

[bobgeese]

lol obscure 200-level seminar at a Kansas University about angry white men's responses to civil rights for minorities and LGBT people, and of course some angry white dude runs off to "MAGAimg.net" to post a picture of some crossdressers in fucking England.
Literally nailing the course description to a T

You do realize I am never in the shit tier race threads here, right?

You realize the goose has never had his jimmies rustled, right?

I am simply pointing out the FACT that if you are paying money, to go to college, then sign up for a course on “Angry white males” there is a 96% chance you’re a liberal freak.

 

[Sketch]

lol the "this coming from an Asian dude" part killed me. <45>
Thanks for the amazing insights Confucius; you really synthesized what this course is about.
Make sure to picket outside this school too: https://www.asianamerican.northwestern.edu/undergraduate/first-year.html

The fact that he's Asian and you reply to him as 'thanks confucius' is pretty racist.

 

[brackis1]

No shit, your fellow white males are "getting angry" 'cause they're being treated like shit by their own kind, like what you're doing here. Even Ray Charles can see that. Have some dignity and stand up for your own people.

About the link with the Asian American Studies, I don't see what your point is. If they were perpetuating self-hate towards their own fellow Asians or racism to other people, then I'd disagree with them too.

You are mentally incapable of differentiating between the study of "all white men are angry" and "some men in the US and UK are very angry because they are powerless and upset by civil rights". Which again, is being proven to a T here because a bunch of low class twits are flipping a shit about a 20-person seminar in fucking Kansas, while the white guy who actually holds a decent degree and is white remains calm and doesn't give a fuck about this course because of an appropriate calibration to their outrage-meter. (Which could be explained by a heightened socioeconomic status, as taught in the course)

 

[brackis1]

The fact that he's Asian and you reply to him as 'thanks confucius' is pretty racist.

He tried to use his race to support why he was right, but I'm glad you're so keen to cry racism when it suits you.

 

[Madmick]

You sound really smart and should undertake such a study.
Make sure to use the word 'Valid' a lot to support your thesis, that's how a thesis gets proved.

Well, this is better than listening to you try to talk about basketball.

 

[bobgeese]

I don't buy into the notion that only the majority population can be racist. I also don't think it's a particularly interesting debate topic. I kind of just wish it would go away so that instead of getting hung up on semantics, we can focus on right vs wrong. Call it what you want, racism or not (I call it racism), if you pass harsh judgements on people by their race then you are in the wrong.

This thread is a good example of why most people sort of annoy me when it comes to politics. You have people playing the, "Oh boo hoo" role, which is helpful to absolutely nobody and only serves to piss people off. Or Then you have people who are rightfully criticizing the course title, but seemingly just shaking their fist at the sky and ranting about it instead of looking into the course description and explaining the outrage with any nuance. That is also annoying to me, and makes me uninteresting in participating in the discussion.

The first thing I did was Google the Professor. He's a white guy. I doubt he's a racist against white guys. I see he's written about 5 books on various subjects in the humanities, so this is also not his only focus. So then I read the course description, and the course description is nowhere near as inflammatory as the title suggests. The course seems to be focused on how the historically majority dominating class (white males in this case) in a society react to rapidly changing social structure. That is a very legitimate sociological area of study, and almost an obvious topic for rapidly modernizing world.

Does it need to be called "Angry White Male Studies"? No, I think that's overly sardonic and he should call it something less inflammatory. But is this guy's college course something that outrages me and that I find deeply racist and offensive? No, other than the title of the course I'm pretty indifferent about it and I think everybody else would be too. If a black professor had a class called "Angry Black Man Studies" I would be equally indifferent. There are historical and sociological aspects to these things that really could be explored academically.

Wow, the teacher is a white guy, I’m shocked...





The only people who talk about this shit are fat black women, fat white “lesbians” with purple hair, and effeminate self hating white men. And maybe a few gay guys.

 

[brackis1]

Well, this is better than listening to you try to talk about basketball.

Sick burn dude! Oh man you totally disproved the fact that I know a lot about basketball!

 

[ProBoxingInsidr]

Racist af. While you’re at it l, be sure to create the “angry black man studies”.

if they had a class, it would more likely be "black men and why they are misunderstood and victims of angry white men's racism."

 

[brackis1]

Wow, the teacher is a white guy, I’m shocked...





The only people who talk about this shit are fat black women, fat white “lesbians” with purple hair, and effeminate self hating white men. And maybe a few gay guys.

So yeah, you literally rattled off what this course is about and validated its accuracy: white angry guys freaking out about gays and racial minorities.
"Employing interdisciplinary perspectives this course examines how both dominant and subordinate masculinities are represented and experienced in cultures undergoing periods of rapid change connected to modernity as well as to rights-based movements of women, people of color, homosexuals and trans individuals."

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

I don't buy into the notion that only the majority population can be racist. I also don't think it's a particularly interesting debate topic. I kind of just wish it would go away so that instead of getting hung up on semantics, we can focus on right vs wrong. Call it what you want, racism or not (I call it racism), if you pass harsh judgements on people by their race then you are in the wrong.

This thread is a good example of why most people sort of annoy me when it comes to politics. You have people playing the, "Oh boo hoo" role, which is helpful to absolutely nobody and only serves to piss people off. Or Then you have people who are rightfully criticizing the course title, but seemingly just shaking their fist at the sky and ranting about it instead of looking into the course description and explaining the outrage with any nuance. That is also annoying to me, and makes me uninteresting in participating in the discussion.

The first thing I did was Google the Professor. He's a white guy. I doubt he's a racist against white guys. I see he's written about 5 books on various subjects in the humanities, so this is also not his only focus. So then I read the course description, and the course description is nowhere near as inflammatory as the title suggests. The course seems to be focused on how the historically majority dominating class (white males in this case) in a society react to rapidly changing social structure. That is a very legitimate sociological area of study, and almost an obvious topic for rapidly modernizing world.

Does it need to be called "Angry White Male Studies"? No, I think that's overly sardonic and he should call it something less inflammatory. But is this guy's college course something that outrages me and that I find deeply racist and offensive? No, other than the title of the course I'm pretty indifferent about it and I think everybody else would be too. If a black professor had a class called "Angry Black Man Studies" I would be equally indifferent. There are historical and sociological aspects to these things that really could be explored academically.

this will easily be the most comprehensive, all encompassing, most thoughtful response in this thread.

 

[brackis1]

if they had a class, it would more likely be "black men and why they are misunderstood and victims of angry white men's racism."

Or both courses could arrive at the same conclusion: being poor and dumb with limited control over the world makes you predisposed to being a violent retard.

 

[BossRootin]

Asians hate these white leftist SJW types.
They have a derogatory word for it in China - Baizuo.
I doubt other minorities think very highly of Baizuo either.

 

[S Class]

You are mentally incapable of differentiating between the study of "all white men are angry" and "some men in the US and UK are very angry because they are powerless and upset by civil rights".

"powerless and upset by civil rights" ... LOL. Man, do you live in some sort of alternate universe or something?

while the white guy who actually holds a decent degree and is white remains calm and doesn't give a fuck about this course because of an appropriate calibration to their outrage-meter. (Which could be explained by a heightened socioeconomic status)

You're full of crap. Every post I see coming from you is you raging about something or crying about something else. Give me a break. You pretending to be "calm" and "not giving a fuck" when pretty much all the posts I've seen from you come off as whiny and aggressive with (now) hints of delusions of grandeur almost makes me laugh.

Only reason you replied to my post is because what I initially said rang some truth to you deep down inside. It's OK. You'll get over it.

 

[Headkicktoleg]

Yeah see.... where'd I say that?
The overwhelming majority of my lineage both present and past were successful and educated. You can be jealous; it's natural as an angry white man from a lesser class with no hope of achievement: your ilk are what this course is about.

We get it, you think you're awesome. Good for you, nobody cares