- Joined
- Nov 28, 2010
- Messages
- 20,615
- Reaction score
- 7,420
The Memory Alpha article also clearly states that the author of the episode hated b-plots and the Sulu story was inserted late against his will.
Makes sense. It's given little attention.The Memory Alpha article also clearly states that the author of the episode hated b-plots and the Sulu story was inserted late against his will.
Just think we got the whole premise of Transporter technology because they couldn't afford to build a shuttlecraft set and model. They also quickly ignored there special boxes that put transported crew members with there invisible shield and oxygen. Then we got M-class planets.Memory Alpha:
The transporter was depicted as the only mode of transport between a planet and the ship because this episode was written and filmed before the existence of the hangar deck and shuttlecraft were established, even though both of these locations are clearly built into the studio model of the Enterprise as seen in the episode. As the lack of a shuttlecraft was almost immediately pointed out as a plot error, production and writing staff later stated that perhaps the shuttlebay was simply out of service for repairs during this episode, which would explain why the crew did not use shuttles to rescue their comrades
I've looked into Babylon 5 and yeah It looks bad
Looks like it takes a lot of effort to get into
Tons of quality issues with the effects
Different cuts of the pilot you need to track down
I am actually glad to hear I am the only one who wants to get into B5 but never could. I mean the premise sounds like I'd really dig it. Just never even made it through the pilot somehow.
I've been curious but haven't really dug into general opinions.I am actually glad to hear I am the only one who wants to get into B5 but never could. I mean the premise sounds like I'd really dig it. Just never even made it through the pilot somehow.
I thought for sure as a kid, this thing would be like a priceless heirloom, and be worth thousands.Picked up a box of my old things from my folks, and found my beloved NcC 1701 A telephone. Remember those things thing with cords. Still works, the ring is the ships red alert klaxon, and the nucels light up red.![]()





The showrunner Michael Chabon, responding to questions via his Instagram page, defended Picard against the latter claim by saying that “shadow defines light”, that “if nothing can rock the Federation’s perfection, then it’s just a magical land”. It is a sentiment that has been echoed in the past by Alex Kurtzman, the showrunner of the other ongoing series set in the same universe, Star Trek: Discovery. He justified its equally violent, profane and dark sensibility by maintaining that modern Star Trek is simply a reflection of its time.
![]()
Star Trek was never a reflection of its time. The entire premise of it was that we've moved far beyond our current problems. It would touch on themes that resonant with us today, but it was always beyond where we're at.
"In the 90s, the darker spin-off show Deep Space Nine pre-empted Picard’s themes by 27 years, asking what happens when the principles of the Federation are compromised by war. The difference was that Deep Space Nine, much like the best of Star Trek, managed to balance its meatier themes of PTSD, faith and wartime atrocities with episodes where everyone got dressed up to visit a holographic version of 60s Las Vegas.
It is this, more than anything else, that is fundamentally lacking from modern Star Trek: a sense of tonal texture, a spirit of curiosity about different worlds and cultures, and the crackling chemistry of a warm and interesting crew."
Nail on the head for me. Also, fuck I'm old