THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see a bunch of salty liberals ITT who apparently are far superior in their legal knowledge to Meuller, the DOJ, OLC, etc.


Surely, this time it’s the end for drumph...
 
Well unlike you I don’t get all my information from Facebook and a sub-forum on a karate website.

Knows everything? No, I just didn’t go full retard with the victory laps like you did. Anyone with a functioning brain (so not you) knew this was going to look bad for Trump.

No Collusion
No Obstruction

Suck it. <3>
 
I see a bunch of salty liberals ITT who apparently are far superior in their legal knowledge than Meuller, the DOJ, OLC, etc.


Surely, this time it’s the end for drumph...

Instead of playing this game could you try and defend the blatant obstruction?

Nah, you won’t do that.
 
I see a bunch of salty liberals ITT who apparently are far superior in their legal knowledge to Meuller, the DOJ, OLC, etc.


Surely, this time it’s the end for drumph...

Queen in The South seems to think so. l@nd0

EDIT : See what I mean? He thinks there was BLATANT obstruction. Of course, if there was BLATANT obstruction, then Mueller should have at least stated as such in his CONCLUSION. But instead he didn't but punted it to Barr who has the final say. He is pathetic (both Mueller for punting it and Queenie)
 
No Collusion
No Obstruction

Suck it. <3>

Literally went out of its way to NOT clear him of obstruction. Mueller just couldn’t indict a sitting president. You should glance over the report before you get more egg on your face.
 
I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.
Oof. Even the "collusion" claim paints a horrible picture for Trump imo. Not illegal but certainly shows plenty of incompetence and lack of ethics.

Fair enough though. It's a long report (I'm just reading clips of the most consequential parts, not reading the whole thing).
 
Queen in The South seems to think so. l@nd0

EDIT : See what I mean?
I think you’re upset that everyone is calling you on being absolutely clueless.

You’ve also admitted to getting all of your information from this forum. So, yeah. I’m not surprised.
 
Literally went out of its way to NOT clear him of obstruction. Mueller just couldn’t indict a sitting president. You should glance over the report before you get more egg on your face.

Remove the ridiculous DOJ rule that a sitting president can not be indicted, Trump would be under indictment as we speak for obstruction of justice.
 
Oof. Even the "collusion" claim paints a horrible picture for Trump imo. Not illegal but certainly shows plenty of incompetence and lack of ethics.

Fair enough though. It's a long report (I'm just reading clips of the most consequential parts, not reading the whole thing).

Why can't any of these Trumpers spell the word collusion?
 
Remove the ridiculous DOJ rule that a sitting president can not be indicted, Trump would be under indictment as we speak for obstruction of justice.

Nothing was stopping Mueller from STATING that Trump Obstructed in his conclusion.

Just like nothing was stopping him from STATING that Trump colluded with Russia in his conclusion.


Even if we take the "sitting president cannot be indicted" into account, him STATING does not mean he is Prosecuting, just making a final conclusion of the evidence.

And guess what? He did NOT state that Trump obstructed but instead left that decision up to the AG, NOT Congress who have zero authority in Prosecuting anyone.
 
Oof. Even the "collusion" claim paints a horrible picture for Trump imo. Not illegal but certainly shows plenty of incompetence and lack of ethics.

Really? Examples?
 
Remove the ridiculous DOJ rule that a sitting president can not be indicted, Trump would be under indictment as we speak for obstruction of justice.

zebby, you are faaaaaaar too rational and just to even glance at clueless shit hole comments.

The fact that you even post here is mind boggling...................
 
Nothing was stopping Mueller from STATING that Trump Obstructed in his conclusion.

Just like nothing was stopping him from STATING that Trump colluded with Russia in his conclusion.


Even if we take the "sitting president cannot be indicted" into account, him STATING does not mean he is Prosecuting, just making a final conclusion of the evidence.
Reconsider this.
 
[/QUOTE]
Instead of playing this game could you try and defend the blatant obstruction?

Nah, you won’t do that.



Sure, that’s easy.


“I stand by the legal decisions made by the AG, Rod Rosenstein, and the OLC.”


Btw, that is all the republican house members have to say. The media/dems glorified Rosenstien so much, they won’t be able to get any serious traction by demeaning a decision he helped make.
 
Really? Examples?
I'll find specific passages when I have time and none of it is new but the report shows that people in the campaign knew that they shared goals with Russia and were enthusiastic about working with them. And that Jr was essentially too dumb to prosecute. But they knew about Russia hacking of emails and their efforts to help them win and did not report it to the authorities. Not a crime but unethical and their failure to realize it's shady makes them incompetent.

It's in there. If you get through it all you'll see it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,844
Messages
58,321,413
Members
175,999
Latest member
xande.fight
Back
Top