THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

[King in the North]

I get all the information I need from here, both from the clowns (guess who I'm talking about) and from those who have actual brains and common sense. Plus, there's also social media that covers it, too.

I'm not about to sit and read over 400 plus pages(minus the redacted ones).

Are you kidding me? Open a newspaper. Don’t get your news from the WR and Facebook exclusively.


So you trust the birthers, sandy hookers, and the guy who doesn’t believe in Mars? Yeah you’re totally listening to the right bunch.

 

[andnowweknow]

I'd love for there to be full transparency, with all of this unclassified and unredacted. I've been saying so for years. But there's the little problem of the rule of law.

Also, the fact you want an individual's private financials to be weaponized against them is a great argument against the income tax and the IRS as currently constituted.

He's not some individual. He's a public servant, and the president. 100% legitimate reasons, within the law you are basically lying about supporting since you're clearly only for it when it suits you. The law is 100% clear, not subject to opinions. Don't act like you're about the law and then argue against it like it's some human right not to have Congress aware of the financial liabilities of a well known grifter who inhabits the White House. Don't like scrutiny, don't run for office.

You're completely fine with someone you'll openly admit is a terrible person and serial sociopathic liar and I'm skirting the line of questioning your integrity? I'm being far too kind.

In it's haste to hate the liberals on the far left (I find them to be generally ridiculous human beings myself at times) the Trump base is giving a pass to utterly corrosive behavior by the guy you basically support by default.

 

[zebby23]

LOL! Yeah I noticed he was mentioning me every few minutes (which is cool, I'm not complaining) but it suddenly stopped. I bet he realized it's way worse than he thought.

Which would be pretty unusual. A trumper admitting he/she may have been wrong?

 

[King in the North]

I'd love for there to be full transparency, with all of this unclassified and unredacted. I've been saying so for years. But there's the little problem of the rule of law.

Also, the fact you want an individual's private financials to be weaponized against them is a great argument against the income tax and the IRS as currently constituted.

You do know he’s the president, right? Sometimes I can’t tell with what you post.

 

[waiguoren]

Hey, I noticed you stopped mentioning me. Did you get to the part about obstruction? Or the parts where Trump and his team are highly unethical and incompetent but didn't commit a criminal conspiracy basically because a few people said no to Trump??

I'm curious if you still think the report is good for Trump (if you've had enough time to digest it of course). I think it's a complete disaster. And Trump isn't behaving as if it's good for him (still slamming Mueller and the whole investigation).

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

 

[andnowweknow]

Comey TESTIFIED that the Russians didn’t give anything to Wikileaks.

Just ignore that. Which you will. I bet you even keep saying that nonsense on this forum in the coming days and weeks.

Invoking Comey is now the Trumper move? Have you no shame sir? (Rhetorical)

 

[Darkballs]

I believe (keyword : Believe) that Roger Stone is innocent and that he was strong-armed into lying to Congress.

What does that have to do with you claiming that trump was referring to the special counsel wrongfully indicting them, because that's what they always do?

 

[zebby23]

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

There he goes with the focus on Collusion.

No collusion so nothing to see here lol

 

[Darkballs]

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

Let us know when you get to the multiple attempts at obstruction. I'm interested in how you'll spin it.

 

[andnowweknow]

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

Mysteriously no mention of obstruction...it's almost as if you might not have the time to read the 2nd part...

It's amazing that not one Trump fanatic has admitted he did anything wrong in the face of that dumpster fire of condemnation of a report.

 

[King in the North]

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

It looks great for Trump? I’d hate to see your opinion on what looks bad for him.

What about obstruction/everything else? Because if you make it through the introduction you’re going to be upset.

 

[glenwo2]

I got to page 40-something before I got busy. I do intend to finish the report. So far it looks great for Trump. The core "collusion" accusation that MSM talking heads and top Democrats have levied at Trump was dead on arrival, and the introduction of the report is all one needs to read to know that.

@King in the North disagrees and thinks he knows everything. #FullOfShit

 

[BarryDillon]

 

[Confucamus]

It's really sad watching people desperately trying to spin this report as a bad thing for Trump. I mean, I guess we should have expected that. The Democrats really have no other choice but to die on that hill. They have no other platform. They've wasted 2.5 years and do not have the time or the candidate to have a solid shot at 2020. All they'll concentrate on is vague language of obstruction of justice...... none of which was illegal.......and it was for a crime that didn't exist.

Man, what a time to be alive.

 

[glenwo2]

What does that have to do with you claiming that trump was referring to the special counsel wrongfully indicting them, because that's what they always do?

I thought you were asking me to name an instance of the Special Counsel putting innocent men in jail or something like that.

 

[King in the North]

@King in the North disagrees and thinks he knows everything. #FullOfShit

Well unlike you I don’t get all my information from Facebook and a sub-forum on a karate website.

Knows everything? No, I just didn’t go full retard with the victory laps like you did. Anyone with a functioning brain (so not you) knew this was going to look bad for Trump.

 

[King in the North]

It's really sad watching people desperately trying to spin this report as a bad thing for Trump. I mean, I guess we should have expected that. The Democrats really have no other choice but to die on that hill. They have no other platform. They've wasted 2.5 years and do not have the time or the candidate to have a solid shot at 2020. All they'll concentrate on is vague language of obstruction of justice...... none of which was illegal.......and it was for a crime that didn't exist.

Man, what a time to be alive.

Can you read at least a summary of the report and come back? It’s obvious you haven’t looked into it and you look like a fool. Trying to do you a solid here.

Also the investigation was launched by republicans lol.

 

[Darkballs]

I thought you were asking me to name an instance of the Special Counsel putting innocent men in jail or something like that.

And that was the only example you could think of? Is that what you claim trump was referring to when he said "I'm fucked."

You really can't come up with anything else?

 

[zebby23]

It's really sad watching people desperately trying to spin this report as a bad thing for Trump. I mean, I guess we should have expected that. The Democrats really have no other choice but to die on that hill. They have no other platform. They've wasted 2.5 years and do not have the time or the candidate to have a solid shot at 2020. All they'll concentrate on is vague language of obstruction of justice...... none of which was illegal.......and it was for a crime that didn't exist.

Man, what a time to be alive.

Another person strung out on Hannity.

It's not illegal so who cares right?

 

[King in the North]

Woah woah woah! But no collusion!

He didn’t get indicted! I mean, we knew he couldn’t get indicted, but he didn’t!

Witch hunt!