THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I need to see some Seth Abramson tweets before I can comment on all of this
 
Darkballs said:
Weird to see all the trumpers celebrating here. I mean, it's expected that no matter what they would ride trump's balls. But given that even the redacted report lists actions that are clearly impeachable, I wasn't expecting such an autistic victory dance.
Click to expand...
They have no threshold of wrongdoing for the President and his acolytes. None.

We're all well and truly fucked. SDNY is going to get shutdown next. Apparently the IG is going to go hard after Steele.
 
waiguoren said:
Mueller report, page 10:

[T]he investigation established that interactions between Russian ambassador Kislyak and Trump Campaign officials both at the candidate's April 2016 foreign policy speech in Washington, D.C., and during the week of the Republican National Convention were brief, public, and non-substantive. And the investigation did not establish that one Campaign official's efforts to dilute a portion of the Republican Party platform on providing assistance to Ukraine were undertaken at the behest of candidate Trump or Russia. The investigation also did not establish that a meeting between Kislyak and Sessions in September 2016 at Sessions's Senate office included any more than a passing mention of the presidential campaign.

Link to the full Mueller report: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-document.html
@kpt018
@andnowweknow
@BarryDillon
@Joe

Oh geez, I remember when certain posters in this thread cited the Kislyak meetings as clear evidence of collusion. Also I remember that @Jack V Savage was convinced that the Republican platform was changed at the behest of Russia.
Click to expand...

Well done. The Trump Russia Collusion claim is done except for the dead enders.

2ywsot.jpg


My only hope is that the Democratic Congress (HOR) tries to impeach Trump over it. I recall how many seats the Republicans lost after Clinton lied to a Federal Judge and they impeached him for it. This will be far worse as there is no underlying crime.
 
SBJJ said:
Christ. You seriously need to read shit better. A grand jury was opened. I said nothing about guilt or innocence.

I said it evidence does not result in indictments or trials the defendant is essentially cleared. Then you brought up no trial and that he could be found guilty later.

Dude. A person is innocent until proven otherwise.

Everyone in this forum could scream you are a child lover. Photographs can be produced of you next to kids. Photos can show you walking by preschools. None of that equals guilt and you are not required to prove your innocence.

I understand you are not American (ignorant of taxes/electoral college/executive powers) but in the US a person does not have to prove their innocence
Click to expand...
No you need to read MY post you replied to with that Grand Jury reply as you ignorantly thought it was relevant reply when it was not.

Dude, Mueller has no ability to charge a sitting a POTUS per him following DOJ guidelines.

So he was never going to charge and get to a finding of guilt or innocence.

What Mueller was going to do was gather evidence to provide to others so they could examine and his CONCLUSIONS as to whether charges should be brought.

In doing so he has said clearly that there is lots of evidence to be considered.

You REPEATING, Mueller did not get a verdict of guilty in court is meaningless garbage as he was never going there. You then trying to say that then all the evidence exonerates is garbage.

it would be the equivalent of you walking into the active SDNY Investigations of Trump going on currently and saying 'you have no court verdict YET, and everyone is presumed innocent without a court verdict and therefore Trump is exonerated'. NO HE IS NOT. The evidence collected specifically says he is not.

You need to try and comprehend what you read.
 
So now wanting to fire Mueller is obstruction?

If I want to smash the dude who threw the kid in the mall....am I guilty of assault?
 
Darkballs said:
Weird to see all the trumpers celebrating here. I mean, it's expected that no matter what they would ride trump's balls. But given that even the redacted report lists actions that are clearly impeachable, I wasn't expecting such an autistic victory dance.
Click to expand...

You ride that impeachment train. The result will be mass gain of Republican seats in the House of Representatives. Just like the Democrats received when the Republicans impeached Clinton after he lied to a Federal Judge.

2ywq7z.jpg
 
MikeMcMann said:
No you need to read MY post you replied to with that Grand Jury reply as you ignorantly thought it was relevant reply when it was not.

Dude, Mueller has no ability to charge a sitting a POTUS per him following DOJ guidelines.

So he was never going to charge and get to a finding of guilt or innocence.

What Mueller was going to do was gather evidence to provide to others so they could examine and his CONCLUSIONS as to whether charges should be brought.

In doing so he has said clearly that there is lots of evidence to be considered.

You REPEATING, Mueller did not get a verdict of guilty in court is meaningless garbage as he was never going there. You then trying to say that then all the evidence exonerates is garbage.

it would be the equivalent of you walking into the active SDNY Investigations of Trump going on currently and saying 'you have no court verdict YET, and everyone is presumed innocent without a court verdict and therefore Trump is exonerated'. NO HE IS NOT. The evidence collected specifically says he is not.

You need to try and comprehend what you read.
Click to expand...


Lofl

This is night and day reading your past posts

So now you state the report/investigation was never to find guilt. Lol

But the report does conclude no guilt on collision.

You truly are the forum idiot
 
Whippy McGee said:
You ride that impeachment train. The result will be mass gain of Republican seats in the House of Representatives. Just like the Democrats received when the Republicans impeached Clinton after he lied to a Federal Judge.
Click to expand...

I know the contents of even this redacted report have you triggered, but stay on topic.
 
I don't think I've ever heard an AG or prosecutor of any kind refer to a Court ordered wiretap as 'spying'. I think it shows very clearly what and who Barr is loyal to.
 
Darkballs said:
It's telling other people to lie that's obstruction.



No. But you are guilty of making a stupid point.
Click to expand...

Source from report that Trump ordered any witness to lie to investigators
 
BKMMAFAN said:
I don't think I've ever heard an AG or prosecutor of any kind refer to a Court ordered wiretap as 'spying'. I think it shows very clearly what and who Barr is loyal to.
Click to expand...

Source for which court ordered a mole to infiltrate the campaign
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,626
Messages
58,306,498
Members
176,000
Latest member
Furigo94

Share this page

Back
Top