THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
1. It's hilarious trolling.
2. Trump wasn't caught at all, let alone red-handed. No charges are being brought against Trump, because no crime was committed by Trump. Barr was entirely truthful on that matter.

No charges brought because the investigation wasn't designed to bring charges against Trump. Points to evidence that would lead to charges (boy howdy) for anyone else. But I'd bet anything that you haven't read it and won't. So there's really nothing for you to say. We get that you blindly and dishonestly defend your party at all costs. Just put it in your sig. No need to make additional posts.
 
do people seriously think anything will come out of this? lol when will people learn Trump isn't getting impeached lol
 
No charges brought because the investigation wasn't designed to bring charges against Trump. Points to evidence that would lead to charges (boy howdy) for anyone else. But I'd bet anything that you haven't read it and won't. So there's really nothing for you to say. We get that you blindly and dishonestly defend your party at all costs. Just put it in your sig. No need to make additional posts.

So Trump did collude with Putin to manipulate the US election? You should call Mueller and see if you can persuade him to come around to that view.
 
I do care what Trump did and have stated many times that if he illegally colluded with Russia to win the election he should be impeached. But it's clear now that he did nothing and that what seemed to be an irresponsibly baseless collusion investigation in fact failed to find anything to substantiate a collusion charge. That Trump did not collude with Russia is the truth that is being obsfuscated.
And the obvious obstruction?...the whole point of which was to destroy the possibility of being caught? They destroyed evidence, tried to fire the guy investigating them, lied at every turn...and Trump refused to testify + his written answers continued with "I don't remember for 37 questions.

And charges, as we know now, were never a possibility on EITHER count. You celebrating that is silly.

It was a Republican led and begun investigation..."I'm fucked"
 
No charges brought because the investigation wasn't designed to bring charges against Trump. Points to evidence that would lead to charges (boy howdy) for anyone else. But I'd bet anything that you haven't read it and won't. So there's really nothing for you to say. We get that you blindly and dishonestly defend your party at all costs. Just put it in your sig. No need to make additional posts.

When you can't tell the difference between a @Jack V Savage post and a @zebby23 post:

th


Sad times...
 
So Trump did collude with Putin to manipulate the US election? You should call Mueller and see if you can persuade him to come around to that view.
Maybe we'd know if their wasn't so much obstructing going on? That's the point after all...
 
So Trump did collude with Putin to manipulate the US election? You should call Mueller and see if you can persuade him to come around to that view.

My view comes from the report (in part). If you ever read the report and wish to discuss it honestly, let me know.

Also, you cannot defend Barr, as he made comments about the report that were flatly contradicted by the contents (for example, that the administration cooperated fully).
 
Maybe we'd know if their wasn't so much obstructing going on? That's the point after all...

No, the point is that there was never an adequate basis to begin the investigation, and the investigation itself has ultimately substantiated this criticism.
 
My view comes from the report (in part). If you ever read the report and wish to discuss it honestly, let me know.

Also, you cannot defend Barr, as he made comments about the report that were flatly contradicted by the contents (for example, that the administration cooperated fully).

Of course I can defend Barr. He did a fine job.
 
Yes, it is. I had been hoping that he either didn't collude or his people sheltered him from the details like any sensible Politician. ;)

Pressure, don't make me laugh.

The words "sensible" and "Politician" are NEVER in the same sentence. :D
 
He put a punctuation mark on an investigation that was given too wide a latitude and too long a leash and that still came up with nothing. Given how poorly Dems are accepting the news that there is no collusion or ooj, they need help terminating an affair they had become overly emotionally invested in.
You say a lot of things are demonstrably false.

Do you want to take it to the bet thread he did not come up with nothing and in fact come up with all sorts of indictments and convictions that went to the most core element of why the investigations was constituted?

Are you willing to stand behind your words?
 
Arrest Mueller for treason then, pussy.
Mueller is not guilty of treason. Trump has not accused Mueller of treason. Trump does not have the ability to arrest Mueller.
 
I don't generally see these things as wins and losses, but if you insist we score it that way, then yes, it is a big win, obviously so. And correspondingly a loss for those committed to the notion that Trump should be charged with collusion despite the lack of evidence.

Well using these rules Trump “won” before the investigation started. Legality should not be the benchmark for a president
 
I'll give you this, you know how to propose a bet that gives you great odds, like the guy that got firms to clump together toxic debt he could short before the great recession. A tip of the hat my good man. <Gordonhat>

You mean that Great Recession that's been Predicted since Day 1 of his Presidency?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top