Law THE POLICE SHOOTING/USE OF FORCE MEGATHREAD: discussions to determine if justified or not

He had a heavy finger when it came to the report button.


How would you know that without mod permissions or a mod telling you? Even if that poster told you he was reporting you, that doesn't mean he actually did. So how exactly do you know? Or are you just framing your opinion as fact......again?


btw, you cried about name calling, but your posts are still chock full.....WEAKLING.

You’re basically a sad, pathetic creature that runs his mouth online because he would have his ample ass handed to him irl.

Heart disease, half a liver, 1 leg amputated, and you would strike ZERO fear in me....even while undergoing dialysis. ZERO!


I posted aother vid, picked one that wasn't age restricted so you can view it without having mature content in your browser/device history.

Predicting you say dumb shit like "I don't like the way they did things, but they were justified in spraying bullets around a residential neighborhood."
 
Last edited:
I would block you, but that’s as much of a bitch move as.......

Running from your own thread? Crying that someone insulted you in the WR?

But oh no, you aren't gotten to....not a single bit. Lmao

And what information are you so concerned about gathering from my account? If you want to know something, just take a deep breath, keep your knees and lips from quivering, and ask.
 


@Poon Goon

This one is the same Sacremento SD that chased and shot the guy trying to stab the biker. Far too complex for the feeble mind of @nhbbear, but it is his thread and not age restricted.

Thoughts? (Shit brief by me)

Car didn't look like it was going to hit either cop. However, it's easy for me to say that when I'm not one of the guys potentially getting ran over.
 
Car didn't look like it was going to hit either cop. However, it's easy for me to say that when I'm not one of the guys potentially getting ran over.

I was hoping Piggly Wiggly would weigh in so I could wreck his "expert" opinion once again. This girl shouldn't be facing any charges. The wrong people are in jail here.


@nhbbear Are you on medical leave... again? Or are you running from the discussion in your own thread.....again? In this case, whether the police were justified in shooting at poor little Kyrieanna Liles?
 
Last edited:
I was hoping Piggly Wiggly would weigh in so I could wreck his "expert" opinion once again. This girl shouldn't be facing any charges. The wrong people are in jail here.


@nhbbear Are you on medical leave... again? Or are you running from the discussion in your own thread.....again? In this case, whether the police were justified in shooting at poor little Kyrieanna Liles?

“Heart disease, half a liver, 1 leg amputated, and you would strike ZERO fear in me....even while undergoing dialysis. ZERO!”

Sure anakin, I have the high ground. And yep, I simply don’t have the desire to argue with people that run their mouths non stop-especially about health issues, considering you’re half a man. Yep, I had my MRIs this week and I have two ruptured discs and bone spurs in my neck, but I am pretty sure I could whoop your as. Hey, what do you call a quad amputee laying on the ground? Matt. So, fuck off matt
 
“Heart disease, half a liver, 1 leg amputated, and you would strike ZERO fear in me....even while undergoing dialysis. ZERO!”

Sure anakin, I have the high ground. And yep, I simply don’t have the desire to argue with people that run their mouths non stop-especially about health issues, considering you’re half a man. Yep, I had my MRIs this week and I have two ruptured discs and bone spurs in my neck, but I am pretty sure I could whoop your as. Hey, what do you call a quad amputee laying on the ground? Matt. So, fuck off matt

You sound hangry lmao. You also don't sound like you are in any kind of condition to fuck with me either in person, or online. Quit while you are behind Sherbro.
 
You sound hangry lmao. You also don't sound like you are in any kind of condition to fuck with me either in person, or online. Quit while you are behind Sherbro.

Condition, physically or mentally, is not the issue. You’re tiresome. It’s gone way beyond the issues. There are dozens of cases I listed. Not one person took one and made any discussion of those and instead did what I knew people would do-what about this case. I am going back to what I started here-breaking down cases that drew a lot of criticism and outrage on good shoots or those that got charges like rashard brooks, mike brown, alton sterling, the case in Dallas where they used a bomb to take out an active shooter that killed nine cops.
 
There are dozens of cases I listed.
You listed a couple of cases that have already been decided by the Courts. That's not a discussion to determine whether or not an OIS is justifiable. That's you regurgitating someone else's opinions and arguments. No one was interested in that discussion despite you tagging numerous members, including me.

When it came to assessing new OIS, you admittedly didn't even read the code/statute that applied. You admitted to not knowing, or caring, what the actual policy was of the department involved.

Apparently, Your definition of a "Good OIS," is where the Officer avoids a criminal conviction, regardless of policy or Code.

My definition of a "Good OIS" is one where the Officer followed his departments policy, as well as the State Code/Statute.




I picked one with no police murder porn or age restrictions so you can watch without setting off alarms.
So here you go. Meet Harley Quinn. She's still incarcarated after 2 Sacremento Stormtroopers fired 10 shots at her while she was unarmed. The 2 Cops aren't in jail. Was this OIS justified or not? What about the Critical incident brief, transparent or no?


Also, are you planning on taking another hiatus running from your own thread again?
 
@nhbbear

Don't be scared Homie. Don't be lazy. Don't make excuses. The girl in the above video was shot at 10 times. Her Mom claims she has mental health issues. Do a little research, tell me why this girl is in jail instead of the Stormtroopers. And tell me why your mental health issues are more important than hers.

Don't run from this thread and then tag me in random threads while you cry a river to Sherdog. That's the Bitch made way. If you no longer want to discuss police use of force , just say so.
 
Last edited:
You listed a couple of cases that have already been decided by the Courts. That's not a discussion to determine whether or not an OIS is justifiable. That's you regurgitating someone else's opinions and arguments. No one was interested in that discussion despite you tagging numerous members, including me.

When it came to assessing new OIS, you admittedly didn't even read the code/statute that applied. You admitted to not knowing, or caring, what the actual policy was of the department involved.

Apparently, Your definition of a "Good OIS," is where the Officer avoids a criminal conviction, regardless of policy or Code.

My definition of a "Good OIS" is one where the Officer followed his departments policy, as well as the State Code/Statute.




I picked one with no police murder porn or age restrictions so you can watch without setting off alarms.
So here you go. Meet Harley Quinn. She's still incarcarated after 2 Sacremento Stormtroopers fired 10 shots at her while she was unarmed. The 2 Cops aren't in jail. Was this OIS justified or not? What about the Critical incident brief, transparent or no?


Also, are you planning on taking another hiatus running from your own thread again?


That’s all you got? Claiming that not posting everyday is running from a thread? Choosing not to answer your bullshit “uhmm, what about this one?” I don’t care about some case you’re trying to drag in here. A girl got shot at, you say? Then arrested. Clearly, you think this is a bad shoot and you think I’ll defend it or you wouldn’t bring it here. I’m not even looking at it and I was working on a new one for you to tuck and run from. exactly what I predicted. Y’all bitches. There’s probably fifteen cases in the first ten pages or so. They have not all been decided. They are all disputed, litigated, protested, and by people like you, all considered “bad shoots.” Should be easy for a attorney of your “pedigree.”

And I have been on here forever. The same old bullshit is getting old. For the last few years, I will post like mad for a few days and then back off. It has absolutely nothing to do with you. I have been badgered by far worse/better than you, half man.
 

"THE POLICE SHOOTING/USE OF FORCE MEGATHREAD: discussions to determine if justified or not"​

Note: this new megathread is to discuss police action that may be in a gray area, or is either fiercely contested as to whether the action was justified or not.
I don’t care about some case you’re trying to drag in here. A girl got shot at, you say? Then arrested.

Isn't that why you started the thread, to discuss use of force cases that may be in a gray area? Firing 10 rounds at an unarmed woman seems to fit the bill.

If the discussion is too complex for you, deuces, wish you well. Don't tag me no more.
 
Last edited:
Note: this new megathread is to discuss police action that may be in a gray area, or is either fiercely contested as to whether the action was justified or not.

At this point, i might as well just working on the next story. I don’t think there’s anyone willing to undertake the amount of reading or research necessary

That seems to be a common response. Everyone is afraid of actually taking the time to learn anything about a particular case enough to even attempt to make a valid argument one way or another. It’s really impressive how lazy y’all are

@Joshuaace one person I forgot to tag for this thread that always likes to argue how bad cops are and has tried to say on several occasions that I have no idea what I am talking about and I am in fact, dangerous and everything that is wrong with law enforcement. Meanwhile, he claims to be a defense attorney and if so, his attitude, progressive prosecutors, politicians, social media, so called activists, civil rights lawyers and family to continually coddle, victimize, martyr, and make excuses for violent shitbag offenders is everything that’s wrong with the criminal and civil courts.

Come at me bro. Pick a case, there’s plenty to choose from




I picked one with no police murder porn or age restrictions so you can watch without setting off alarms.
So here you go. Meet Harley Quinn. She's still incarcarated after 2 Sacremento Stormtroopers fired 10 shots at her while she was unarmed. The 2 Cops aren't in jail. Was this OIS justified or not? What about the Critical incident brief, transparent or no?


I don’t care about some case you’re trying to drag in here. A girl got shot at, you say? Then arrested. Clearly, you think this is a bad shoot and you think I’ll defend it or you wouldn’t bring it here.

@irish_thug @panamaican @Sinister @TeTe @LMP I was tagged in to this thread just like some of you were. I was challenged to pick a case, and I did. TS is no longer interested in having the discussion he started the thread to have. He should be shamed publicly, complete with feathers, tar and stuff, and the thread needs shit canned also. Too bad, It's an interesting case, multiple points of law that he is a self proclaimed expert at.
 
@irish_thug @panamaican @Sinister @TeTe @LMP I was tagged in to this thread just like some of you were. I was challenged to pick a case, and I did. TS is no longer interested in having the discussion he started the thread to have. He should be shamed publicly, complete with feathers, tar and stuff, and the thread needs shit canned also. Too bad, It's an interesting case, multiple points of law that he is a self proclaimed expert at.
So stop posting. @nhbbear if he is no longer wanting to engage in discourse itt don't tag him in.

I will not be pressured into tarring and feathering anyone.

Have a lovely day
 
@irish_thug @panamaican @Sinister @TeTe @LMP I was tagged in to this thread just like some of you were. I was challenged to pick a case, and I did. TS is no longer interested in having the discussion he started the thread to have. He should be shamed publicly, complete with feathers, tar and stuff, and the thread needs shit canned also. Too bad, It's an interesting case, multiple points of law that he is a self proclaimed expert at.
You're fucking obsessed. Tone it down a bit. You don't even want a honest discussion. Why should he care about your dumb ass?
 
@koquerelle

I aswered your question Bud. I have one for you. Why would you make your first appearance 500 posts deep in to a thread to White Knight for a grown man?

Wondering how you read enough of the thread to form the opinion that I'm obsessed, without realizing TS begged numerous members, including me, to come debate a very specific topic at an in depth level. Which is exactly what I did.

I will not be pressured into tarring and feathering anyone.

For future reference, are bribes of Girl Scout Thin Mints and PB Cookies more effective than pressure?

Had a great day, Thanks! Hope you did as well.
 
@koquerelle

I aswered your question Bud. I have one for you. Why would you make your first appearance 500 posts deep in to a thread to White Knight for a grown man?

Wondering how you read enough of the thread to form the opinion that I'm obsessed, without realizing TS begged numerous members, including me, to come debate a very specific topic at an in depth level. Which is exactly what I did.



For future reference, are bribes of Girl Scout Thin Mints and PB Cookies more effective than pressure?

Had a great day, Thanks! Hope you did as well.
I've been following this thread pretty much from the beginning. I find it interesting to see the different views. I didn't act like a white knight. You've been acting like a toddler for a while and I told you so. "He hasn't been in the thread for a while. Waaaaa." Who cares?

white knight: I doubt @nhbbear or anyone on this forum need my help.
 
You listed a couple of cases that have already been decided by the Courts. That's not a discussion to determine whether or not an OIS is justifiable. That's you regurgitating someone else's opinions and arguments. No one was interested in that discussion despite you tagging numerous members, including me.

When it came to assessing new OIS, you admittedly didn't even read the code/statute that applied. You admitted to not knowing, or caring, what the actual policy was of the department involved.

Apparently, Your definition of a "Good OIS," is where the Officer avoids a criminal conviction, regardless of policy or Code.

My definition of a "Good OIS" is one where the Officer followed his departments policy, as well as the State Code/Statute.




I picked one with no police murder porn or age restrictions so you can watch without setting off alarms.
So here you go. Meet Harley Quinn. She's still incarcarated after 2 Sacremento Stormtroopers fired 10 shots at her while she was unarmed. The 2 Cops aren't in jail. Was this OIS justified or not? What about the Critical incident brief, transparent or no?


Also, are you planning on taking another hiatus running from your own thread again?



This the crazy bitch with the knife going to people's doors with a knife threatening them.

Fuck her. Good shoot.
 
Car didn't look like it was going to hit either cop. However, it's easy for me to say that when I'm not one of the guys potentially getting ran over.
It's unfortunate we can only see what the SHOOTERS (aka the Agency) are allowing us to see...there are other body cam angles that show beyond all shadow of doubt that KyrieAnna turned AWAY from the officer who appeared to come out of nowhere (the adjoining street from behind a fence). As soon as she saw him, she veered away. She never aimed her vehicle at anyone. She is suffering...big time.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping Piggly Wiggly would weigh in so I could wreck his "expert" opinion once again. This girl shouldn't be facing any charges. The wrong people are in jail here.


@nhbbear Are you on medical leave... again? Or are you running from the discussion in your own thread.....again? In this case, whether the police were justified in shooting at poor little Kyrieanna Liles?
My statement here, if you're still interested in Kiwi's case: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hu3N4kKmvzP1UYK-wKSXyMCtdhjPSx59KVx0mqUvUys/edit?usp=drive_link
 
Back
Top