- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Messages
- 31,936
- Reaction score
- 34,270
Angelina or Alicia? Vikander was way better an much more believable than the original bobble head with bolt-ons.Better if she looked like Lara Croft, yes or no?
Angelina or Alicia? Vikander was way better an much more believable than the original bobble head with bolt-ons.Better if she looked like Lara Croft, yes or no?
YOu know what would have sold tickets. A tasteful and artistic lesbian 4 way with the 4 leads.
Nothing prints money like synchronized scissoring.
"Look, people have to buy tickets to this movie, too. This movie has to make money. If this movie doesn’t make money it reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don’t go see women do action movies."
while there's plenty to disagree with, this is not blaming men.
yes she's talking about men, but not saying anything negative or unfair or accusatory
her remarks are something to disagree with, there's no penalty flag to be thrown here.
Wait your favorite movie was that horrible big eyed wanna be anime trash fest? Your opinions are null and void.My favorite movie this year was a female action movie and I saw it twice at the movies (Alita: Battle Angel)
Her attitude is shit and the movie is probably just as bad.
yup.
men don’t go see women do action movies.
what is the negative there?
Wait your favorite movie was that horrible big eyed wanna be anime trash fest? Your opinions are null and void.
That movie was pure shit....The best female action movie this year was the 20 minutes of John Wick 3 that had Halle Berry.
The old style Kung Fu movie flavor in the bar scene was great. The Motorball scene was excellent as well. Entertaining flick if you don't try to watch it as something to be taken seriously. And agreed, there's a reason she's a bug-eyed character and it fits the overall theme of how she's an off planet cyborg who can whoop serious ass.Yep, I loved it. the CGI and art style was great too. It looks uncanny, but thats kinda the point. She ain't a human, shes an advanced cyborg bruh.
Wait your favorite movie was that horrible big eyed wanna be anime trash fest? Your opinions are null and void.
I'm guessing you made a thread about climate change and nobody read it or participated in it so you're upset that this thread is more active and getting more replies.
You are derailing the thread and quite frankly, your whining is cringy as fuck.
you guessed wrong
and there is nothing cringy about conservatives (or whomever) being pissed off about statements of an actor regarding a shit movie?
What is so "cringy" about giving an opinion on an actual cringy statement made by some actor/actress? No different than commenting when your boy Bobby Deniro gets up on stage and says "Fuck Trump" to start his worthless entitled speech.
There is plenty of free space here for you to make a thread about Jane Fonda and climate change, so go ahead and do it. I am sure that any people that give a fuck will join in on your circle jerk.
In Hollywood terms, then, the film is groundbreakingly progressive. It’s something to be celebrated and supported. Or rather, it would have been if it weren’t so terrible.
The most depressing part of Charlie’s Angels is that the feminist agenda it trumpets in so many clumsy speeches is drowned out by the Angels’ own incompetence. Rather than having a story, the film has a string of rote action sequences, and each of these sequences goes the same way: Bosley tells the Angels where the villains are; the Angels stride into wherever they need to be, in their impractical designer outfits; they make a mess of things; and the villains escape. The Angels also manage to assault and /or murder various innocent bystanders while they’re at it, so if the film had any morals it would have ended with the three of them in prison.
<Lmaoo>The best female action movie this year was the 20 minutes of John Wick 3 that had Halle Berry.
<Lmaoo>The best female action movie this year was the 20 minutes of John Wick 3 that had Halle Berry.