- Joined
- Nov 12, 2005
- Messages
- 133,679
- Reaction score
- 32,572
Probably. He spent about 4 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.so you think he'd win the rematch?
Probably. He spent about 4 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.so you think he'd win the rematch?
So you think lomachenko with healthy shoulder would beat Teofimo in a rematch, he spent about 5 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.Probably. He spent about 4 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.
CheckmateSo you think lomachenko with healthy shoulder would beat Teofimo in a rematch, i mean he spent about 5 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.
Tough to say. Lomachenko fought pretty scared, he seemed intimidated by Lopez and Lopez seemed to have his number for most of the fight- timed him well, got off first etc I also never really saw any evidence in the fight that Loma couldn't get his punches off when he wanted to.So you think lomachenko with healthy shoulder would beat Teofimo in a rematch, i mean he spent about 5 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.
Loma didn't fight a dumb fight for 5 rounds, no offense but that's a terrible comparison. He literally fought as technical and high concentration as he could for first half of the fight. If anything, he fought dumb and reckless second half of the fight, but thats what he needed to do at that point. The shoulder narrative, ugh. Takes away from Kambosos accomplishment more than anything. Kambosos was the better boxer and took Teo's 0, simple as that. The best just got beat and Loma has no excuses either.So you think lomachenko with healthy shoulder would beat Teofimo in a rematch, he spent about 5 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.
teo didn’t let him get going. he went first every time and loma was confused. it was a magnificent performance. i also don’t remember loma winning 4 or 5 rounds clearly but definitely at least 3. i haven’t watched the fight since i saw it live though.I don’t think it’s fair to say he didn’t have much of an issue with him. He won a comfortable decision, but a lot of that was Lomachenko doing nothing for rounds at a time. Of the rounds with substantial engagement, Lopez won one and lost what 4-5? There’s a real difference between the scorecards being clear and the idea that a fighter was completely in control for the vast majority of the fight.
this reads a whole lot like “i just love josh taylor” to be honest. no offense, but “he doesn’t fuck around” and “if teo stands toe to toe with him he’s getting ko’d” is really useless as a stylistic breakdown. no one fucks around at the highest level of the sport. i think teo’s got the faster hands, bigger power, and they’re both pretty freaky athletes.taylor is taller than loma, a natural 140lbs, can fight at any range, can crack, and has a chin on him. i think lomachenko is one of the finest boxers we've ever seen, but taylor doesn't have much you can exploit either. dude is versatile as all hell and he won't be intimidated by lopez's physicality at all. in fact, if teo wants to stand toe to toe with taylor, he's going to sleep. josh does not fuck around one bit and will happily oblige him in a shootout.
if lopez has any sense he'll stay the fuck away from josh taylor.
I think just me and @ironfist05Lopez didn't come out of nowhere when he beat Lomachenko. Lots of people picked him to beat Loma. Who picked Kambosos?
And me, obviously.I think just me and @ironfist05
You "pick" the underdog by KO in every single fight just to troll.I think just me and @ironfist05
So you think lomachenko with healthy shoulder would beat Teofimo in a rematch, he spent about 5 rounds fighting a really dumb fight.
That's not true.You "pick" the underdog by KO in every single fight just to troll.
How is that using my own argument against me? They were different fights. Lopez schooled Lomachenko. Him losing to Kambosos has nothing to do with that fight at all.This is exactly what @Seano cannot comprehend: using his own argument against him. It’s like Red says in Friday:
“Oh but that was different!”