There are many more examples in the indictment. Also, Trump never called for Russia to "violate our election laws".
And then the first actual hacks on DNC/Clinton servers, began [July 27, 2016].
Trump called on Russia to find and release Clinton's emails.
Which "campaign law" would be violated?It would be a violation of campaign laws for them to do so, unless you want us to believe that Trump was only asking for Russia to release information that they had somehow uncovered through legal means.
"Applauding the hack" is not the term I would use since I feel it is inaccurate. I think Trump was thrilled at the fruits of the hack, which is understandable.And this was after reports that the DNC and other servers had been hacked. To pretend that trump wasn't applauding this act in particular, is just dishonest.
theres multiple replies to you claiming this earlier on proving you wrong.... why would I believe you now?According to the indictment, the hacks began in March 2016. Trump's statement was on July 27, 2016.
This is something else! These are direct attacks on Clinton personal officeAccording to the indictment, the hacks began in March 2016. Trump's statement was on July 27, 2016.
Right, Clinton's State Department e-mails from the period 2009 to 2013.
This has nothing to do with hack of the DNC/DCCC during the 2016 presidential election campaign.
"Applauding the hack" is not the term I would use since I feel it is inaccurate.
I think Trump was thrilled at the fruits of the hack, which is understandable.
Never forget this (knowing?)accomplice, his Russian talking points and what channel he pushed them on
Point me to the post which "proves me wrong". If you actually read the new indictment, you will see the truth.theres multiple replies to you claiming this earlier on proving you wrong.... why would I believe you now?
this onePoint me to the post which "proves me wrong". If you actually read the new indictment, you will see the truth.
Some context: According to the indictment, Russian operatives had already hacked and attempted to hack the Democratic National Committee and other Clinton-related targets before July. (The indictment says the hacking started in March.) What’s being alleged (with seemingly intentional specificity) is that the Russians didn’t target Clinton’s “personal office” until the day that Trump asked them to
Meanwhile
How do you know ? Who I investigated the evidence to determine it was from Russia . Only a private company i believeAnd then the first actual hacks on DNC/Clinton's personal servers, began that day. You think a poster like yourself so concerned with honesty would mention that.
Do you not think when Russia heard then candidate Trump encourage them to violate our election laws, they were in fact emboldened to do so?