- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 3,566
- Reaction score
- 1,028
@Madmick you want to get in here and tell me how I’m fucking up at reading this?
Dude, you typed a lot of anecdotes there.
The fact that you need to put in many hours and focus to progress in a career isn't anecdotal. Granted, the story about the welfare drive obviously is, but it's a tool to illustrate a point.
Yeah, people with a shit ton on kids are probably not great planners, but it doesn’t mean that if they didn’t have kids they’d have no financial trouble.
Correct, because they're poor planners otherwise as well, that's why they didn't think it would be a major impediment to have 6 kids running around. Probably wouldn't be lawyers or doctors if that hadn't happened, otherwise they would have stopped at 1 or 2, like intelligent people do.
Kids are expensive... for people who spend a lot of money on them (well off people).
How do you not spend a lot of money on kids, particularly if you don't have much to begin with? How are they going to eat? Where are they going to sleep? How are they going to get around?
The reason most upper management folks at your gig don’t have a bunch of kids probably has more to do with career planning and expected standards of living than actually not being able to afford more children.
Yea no shit. The CEO can obviously afford to 20 kids by 20 different baby mommas. But he would never have reached that level had he had 4 kids before he was 25.
But in any case, this is conjecture. We all know that the average number on children per household is down, correct?
Yes, among educated people. We do all know that. We also all know that the world population is still increasing, correct? C'mon bud, don't be obtuse and make me dig out the numbers here. Poor people - on average - have more kids, that's not propaganda, it's fact.