Playing devil's advocate here, assuming everyone calling it weak is of the same mindset as I...
When I say his deadlift is weak, that is in direct comparison to his world class competition. I am 100% positive nobody on this board can even touch 700lbs on DL...That still doesn't take away from the reality of Rob's shortcomings on that lift, and why he might feel the way he does about it to make that statement he made.
Many of the top 10 are nearing the 1000lbs mark or are already there/passed it...Except Robert. So it's not hard to put 1 and 1 together on why he dislikes the lift. It also doesn't help that he is built really shitty for it...As one other poster mentioned above.
Saying his deadlift is behind his competitors is fine, but that's not what some people are saying. Bodil clearly said it's weak for someone who does it for a living and used steroids. He couldn't touch that weight even if he trained full time and used steroids. He's not even in my league, let alone in a position to criticise an elite athlete.
You might be putting 1+1 and getting 3. You're purely guessing that's why he said what he did. I'm naturally a very good deadlifter. I deadlifted 230kg back when I could only squat 155kg, and bench 110kg. It's a lift that comes easy to me, but i never deadlift as it beat's me up my lower back more than other lifts do (in terms of fatigue, not pain/injury). I can do more awork without it, and so I'm much stronger and built more muscle.
There's nothing special about the deadlift, you can get just as strong without it as you can with it, and it's not the best option when it comes to gaining mass either.
If I compete again, I'll start doing them again, but otherwise I'll stick with squats, RDL's, glute ham raises etc. I know if my squat and RDL go up, my deadlift will as well , especially once I practice the movement again.
Not that I'm saying everyone should stop doing it, but there are many ways to get strong.
Last edited: