Story of Jesus Christ was 'fabricated to pacify the poor', claims Biblical scholar Joseph Atwill

You are some kinda moron.

I said about Jesus: There may be a person or people the character is based on.

I said about Mohammed: There may be a person or people the character is based on.

Explain how exactly I boxed myself in?

You haven't made any discernable point in this exchange thus far and have wasted my time, making you a hypocrite on top of a moron.


I mean.... You also wrote all of this....

No one who wrote the NT knew Jesus.

The NT is inconsistent with major details of his life.

We have no original documents from the first century, and scraps at best from the second century.

Jesus wrote nothing at all.

There are no contemporaneous corroborations from independent sources.

In order to believe the NT, you have to disregard all of that and more, and take the word of the anonymous authors of the four gospels, who themselves were relying on the word of people who were recounting the story from people claiming to be witnesses.
 
Ever read the talmud? You can take a woman so long as she has a pubic mound. Gross as fuck but those were the times then...

FYI, that was legal until recently...by recently I mean within the last like 120ish years in most of the world. Biologically and in nature, its actually normal. Its our growing "intelligence" as a species that is telling us it is not because our situation has caused the change. Namely, the vast increase in lifespan and lower child mortality rate. It was just 200ish years ago that the average lifespan in the world finally topped 50 years old with it being under 40 years old in the early 1700s. back in the early 1900s, odds were close to even your child was not going to live and a mother dying in child birth was high also.
 
Jesus tittyfucking Christ, I know what I wrote. Make a point. Anything at all.

Last chance.

I just did make my point. Again. For the second time. You can make all of arguements that you made about Jesus (that you managed to leave out of your revision of your position) about Mohammed. That's why I asked if you believed he was a real person. Because there are so many people who claim to not be religious who really just hate Christians and use the "Religion is dumb" argument as a cover to spout their hate.
 
I just did make my point. Again. For the second time. You can make all of arguements that you made about Jesus (that you managed to leave out of your revision of your position) about Mohammed. That's why I asked if you believed he was a real person. Because there are so many people who claim to not be religious who really just hate Christians and use the "Religion is dumb" argument as a cover to spout their hate.

I understand. You are a moron. You aren't even replying to me, you are replying to the version of me that exists in your imagination.

Anyone who reads our exchange is going to think I am an idiot for replying to you after it was obvious that you were larping the conversation you were having in your head rather than engaging with what I actually wrote.
 
I understand. You are a moron. You aren't even replying to me, you are replying to the version of me that exists in your imagination.

Anyone who reads our exchange is going to think I am an idiot for replying to you after it was obvious that you were larping the conversation you were having in your head rather than engaging with what I actually wrote.

No, I asked you a question, you sort of answered it. I also just told you why I asked you the questions I asked you. Your response to that is "You're a moron".
 
Haven't read all the pages.
I have read that none of the historians of the time when jesus was supposed to of lived actually mentioned him in their writings at that time. If that is true it seems odd to me considering the miracles jesus is claimed to of performed. I'd of thought some of the stuff he did would of been huge news back then. Actually it would be big news today as well, wouldn't it?
 
Haven't read all the pages.
I have read that none of the historians of the time when jesus was supposed to of lived actually mentioned him in their writings at that time. If that is true it seems odd to me considering the miracles jesus is claimed to of performed. I'd of thought some of the stuff he did would of been huge news back then. Actually it would be big news today as well, wouldn't it?

Jesus started being written about by historians within decades of his death. Not sure what you read.
There is little doubt there was a historical figure called Jesus Christ. That much I’m surprised is even being debated anymore. Everything else-how a wandering cult leader became the foremost divine figure in the World-is where the mystery lies.
 
I’m actually Jewish. It’s ok by me if you want to worship a fake Jew but you can come by my house and worship a real one like your mom does

Everybody knows the sequel is never as good as the original. Although I’m not silly enough to believe in the Torah either. No real proof that any of it is factual. Just like Jesus.

I do wonder why Europeans would change his name from what his mom called him?? Seems disrespectful.

Mom jokes? Yeah, you're not rustled at all.

It's amusing you're Jewish now.
 
Mom jokes? Yeah, you're not rustled at all.

It's amusing you're Jewish now.

Lol why would I be rustled? If you wanna believe in fairly tales because the world is too scary for you, more power to you.

I’ve always been Jewish. Don’t know what you on about lol
 
I understand. You are a moron. You aren't even replying to me, you are replying to the version of me that exists in your imagination.

Anyone who reads our exchange is going to think I am an idiot for replying to you after it was obvious that you were larping the conversation you were having in your head rather than engaging with what I actually wrote.
I see you've learned about our bud lfd lol.

Your posts and position were perfectly clear.
 
Go on. Which part is the "made up part"? P.S., I'm agnostic, so if your reply is going to be some weak "LOL, CHRISTIANS" nonsense, please don't waste my time.


The entire thing is Made up. How's that for a start.
 
Is so cringe bro comparing Muhammad with Jesus
One was a rapist who did even sexually assault 6 years old making him a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile also, was a tremendous violent men with no regarding for honor, killing captive men from other tribes to take his wifes.

The other one, was a hippie that preach love and charity even while being tortured.

Libtards.<36>
 
13-14 was a very standard age for women to begin becoming pregnant. 9 was not, and 6 was not an appropriate age for a man to start molesting a girl at any point in history.

Let’s not act like eveangelicals didn’t come out in support of Roy Moore because ‘banging 14 year olds is biblical’ or the MOUNTAIN of priests caught in molestation scandals. It can’t be a coincidence that the religions most associated with child fucking both worship the same god
 
What historians are you referring to?

The historians whose writings came to make up the New Testament. They are the oral traditions passed down through th Apostles. It is a well documented fact that Pontius Pilate's diary containing his writings about his time in Judah and his interactions with the man who came to be know as Jesus survived more or less in it's original form into the Early Middle Ages when it was taken by monks to a monastery where the current canonical story of Jesus was created, and the actual history of the real man and Pontius Pilate destroyed. All that means is there had to be a real man at the core of that to begin with.
 
Back
Top