- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 62,004
- Reaction score
- 16,722
It's a vague and subtle point. You know in FIGHT CLUB how Tyler says the things you own end up owning you? When we have strong regard for the entertainment we use to distract ourselves from the suffering of dying a slow death, is it really worth getting upset over? Why focus on how much something that is meant to entertain us -- why focus on how much it now disappoints?I dont understand your point.
I was simply addressing the alleged claim that 'alt right' reaction was reason enough to prove thats Disney's choice was politically relevant. That's not me making a political statement. That's me trying to move it away from politics.
The point is the best way to move discussion away is by not engaging in the discussion. Because, as soon as you engage -- your words are politically misconstrued to fit someone else's narrative.
As an example: I know what I'm doing in this thread whereas you have a firmly different held perspective of what I am doing. You have said as much; whether it's a joke or not is beside the point. The point is, optically, no matter what I say contrary to your assertion it is likely you will ignore new data in favor of bias.
Another example is recapitulating KK's push toward inclusivity as a rejection of the traditional fanbase.
Third example: THE LAST JEDI is bad vs THE LAST JEDI is good.
What really boggles my mind is this complex house of cards (which is pretending that STAR WARS means something to gender politics as a whole) all sits on top of yet another layer. That is: politicization is just marketing meant to perpetuate the commodification of STAR WARS.
"Marvel vs DC?" "Who will be the best James Bond?" "Reboots or not??" The wallet loses.