So the Sasquatch in the Patterson-Gimlin film is actually Real

You'd have to ask her why she's taking the stance she is.

So you have no problems believing in a being millions of years old, a long hair whipping an army of 1000, a kid with a sling shot kiling a giant, the parting of the Red Sea. Noahs Ark. But you do have a problem buying into an unknown species living in our mountains.

Come on man, you really don't see anything weird there?

PM your SIL's contact information to me and I'll talk to her myself. Not sure why you haven't asked her, but whatever.

The only weird thing I see here is you trying to convince me that Bigfoot is real without presenting any evidence whatsoever.
 
PM your SIL's contact information to me and I'll talk to her myself. Not sure why you haven't asked her, but whatever.

The only weird thing I see here is you trying to convince me that Bigfoot is real without presenting any evidence whatsoever.

Where is the evidence of any of those Bible stories, well? Now you need evidence, that isn't weird?

Like I mentioned my wife heard the thing scream , my wife doesn't lie. And neither does my SIL.

If you are going to believe the parting of the Red Sea, but can't believe an unknown species exists, that is a.......HUH???

So God sent Lucifer down to earth knowing all the trouble he would cause, huh? Why not just kill him like He did with the great flood than wiped out everyone but Noah and family. That makes sense to you?

You can't believe in all that unbelievable Bblical stuff then..........where is the evidence (ah.....huge footprints) of the existence of Big Foot?
 
Where is the evidence of any of those Bible stories, well? Now you need evidence, that isn't weird?

Like I mentioned my wife heard the thing scream , my wife doesn't lie. And neither does my SIL.

The main difference is that I never tried to convince you that the God is real or that the stories in the Bible are factual.

I don't have to offer any evidence because I never made the claim in the first place.

You, yourself, brought up that straw man argument to distract from the fact that there is zero scientific evidence for the existence of Bigfoot.

Even now, you're still trying to convince me that Bigfoot is real because your wife, who you claim is as honest as the day is long, (if you're really married) was talking to your SIL, who you also claim, is as honest as the day is long, (if she even exists) on the phone and heard a scream that you're attributing to a Bigfoot. Why? Because your imaginary SIL said so.

You hucksters are all the same.
 
The main difference is that I never tried to convince you that the God is real or that the stories in the Bible are factual.

I don't have to offer any evidence because I never made the claim in the first place.

You, yourself, brought up that straw man argument to distract from the fact that there is zero scientific evidence for the existence of Bigfoot.

Even now, you're still trying to convince me that Bigfoot is real because your wife, who you claim is as honest as the day is long, (if you're really married) was talking to your SIL, who you also claim, is as honest as the day is long, (if she even exists) on the phone and heard a scream that you're attributing to a Bigfoot. Why? Because your imaginary SIL said so.

You hucksters are all the same.

Who was talking to you at all? You came in here ....right? Dude, I don't lie and since you refuse to accept that fact I'm done with you, all you are now is a waste of my time. Adios~~~~
 
You can’t just recover more data than was originally recorded.

“Restored and enhanced” just means they painted whatever they wanted over the original film.
 
You can’t just recover more data than was originally recorded.

“Restored and enhanced” just means they painted whatever they wanted over the original film.

In other words, manufactured evidence. Just as fake as all the other so-called "evidence" for the existence of Bigfoot.
 
Back
Top