putting aside the idiocy of that law if it is a law...In Canada it is illegal to overserve.
I agree to an extent. Alcohol very quickly overrides the rational part of your mind and it fogs your sense of responsibility. Some people are more vulnerable than others to this. It's very hard to tell, once you're on a roll, when you've been overdrinking. Drunk people are not the best judges of their own behaviour and of how far down the tipsy road they've gone. That's why it's the bar's responsibility not to overserve.How does anyone know he did not drink after getting kicked out of the bar?
If you over drink, you did it to yourself it is not the bars fault, unless the bar tied him down and was funneling alcohol down his throat, then and only then would it be the bars fault.
That's some vital information.The law also makes it clear that if you get someone drunk you have to get them home safely.
Then disregard that part. How are the wrongful death cases handled up there?
putting aside the idiocy of that law if it is a law...
How would they prove he was overserved?
Has nobody ever bought a drink for someone else? What if he was getting drinks bought for him or buying them through someone else and then the bar caught him drunk and booted him?
No that’s not how the law works, sorry. I’m pretty sure that Canada is a common law country and if a law is impossible to follow or unreasonably absurd, there can be no conviction or penalty.Blood alcohol content and circumstances of death IE freezing to death. Whether he was naked or had a parka on is not a factor.
Irrelevant unfortunately. Bartenders are responsible for everyone drinking and to watch them dilligently to ensure they arent over served or over intoxicated. Even if they never once sold him specifically a drink, they are responsible for his drinking at the establishment.
No that’s not how the law works, sorry. I’m pretty sure that Canada is a common law country and if a law is impossible to follow or unreasonably absurd, there can be no conviction or penalty.
I can’t access that link but there is no law that can impose a duty that is impossible or nonsensically optimistic, to meet.Read this. People have been legally held responsible for someone drunk driving and killing someone. Specifically read pages 7 then page 23 for list of penalties violating any aspect of these, as page 7 pertains to over serving specifically and page 23 details a list of penalties most of which tend to be fines but imprisonment can occur.. Case studies of law follow afterward.
Liquor Laws and You - Legislative Assembly of Alberta
I can’t access that link but there is no law that can impose a duty that is impossible or nonsensically optimistic, to meet.
So tell me then, if a person is sitting away in a corner quietly sipping on something and is drunk, then leaves with a friend in a good enough state to get to a gas station, how is it practicable that should they come to some harm, the bar is responsible? Does Canada not have the principle ‘novus actus intervenus’?Copy and paste the title into google it should pop up.
They can and do here. Its in the actual Act of serving, and in law people have been held accountable. Ive resided in alberta and in Ontario and have my smart serve here in ON, there is no difference between them in these regards. Main difference is age of consumption; 18 vs 19.