- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,189
- Reaction score
- 1,064
you don't score defense, so no
Since when does using your face to catch strikes considered defense?
you don't score defense, so no
.
Now, a judges decision is who they think would win the fight, if it were to continue.
I've always thought that judges should be fighters or retired fighters.
Chin points for one guy = Landed punches for the other guy
Landed punches > Having a chin
Dear TS, I love your idea - except instead of trusting those damn judges with taking chin into factor, we should handicap fighters based on strengths and weaknesses.
So if you're a HW fighting Nelson, you get to hit him 20 times in the face before the fight to take into account his chin.
If you're fighting Arlovski, he gets to hit you 10 times in the face.
If you're fighting Kongo, you get two free nut shots.
If you're fighting Nick Diaz, you have to toke with him before the fight.
If you're fighting Cain, you get him to run 10 miles before the fight.
If you're fighting Overeem, you get to hit him in the liver with a baseball bat.
If you're fighting GSP, you get 4 additional special rounds automatically counted for you.
This would also solve the UFC's declining PPV sales problem.
you don't score defense, so no
I know, stupid whitebelt, and I know this will never happen, but it's something we could have a discussion about.
Say you have someone like Mark Hunt, or Roy Nelson fight someone with a suspect chin, like Andre Arlovski, and it's near dead even. Hunt/Nelson first round, second round Arlovski, 10-9. And yes, I know Arlovski KO's Nelson.
Now, a judges decision is who they think would win the fight, if it were to continue. If in the third, Arlovski lands only a few more shots, should a judge think about the chin factor in his decision on who would win, knowing that one fighter can take a better shot to the mug than the other, and that one of the fighters can get ko'd with one punch?
Chin is already factored into judging...
Let's say fighter A hits fighter B with a punch and the fighter B just shrugs it off...
and then let's say fighter A hits fighter C with a punch, with same power as before but the fighter C flies back and lands flat on his back.
Obviously judges are gonna score bigger for the second punch...
Since when does using your face to catch strikes considered defense?
Lol...this is good. I like this.:icon_chee
What the...? There's no way that you're saying defense isn't accounted for in judging. Nah....you wouldn't say something that ridiculous. Especially in a sport where your success & survival is directly related to your SELF-DEFENSE capabilities. Nah...you wouldn't suggest that.
lolWhat?
A judge's decision is who they think won the fight that just happened. Not to predict who would win an imaginary one.
defense isn't scored. A failed td ends up as neutral points