As someone who sat through this 25-minute snoozefest, I was robbed of my time.
But on a more serious note, Strickland has nobody to blame but himself. The guy has 30 pro fights, and definitely knows the risks that come with leaving your fate in the hands of the judges. On top of that, the guy uses a strategy that consists of literally three things:
-Walk backwards;
-Jab;
-Coast to a decision.
Walking backwards is unlikely to get points for octagon control. It's fine when you're under fire, or when your strategy is to counter strike and land that one, lethal and pinpoint accurate shot that'll end the fight. But when all you throw are shots that are absolutely not fight ending, like Strickland's jabs, well it's not exactly (at least on paper) something that looks like you're trying to finish a fight, or even win it convincingly. And coasting to the decision, well, comes with risk. Especially when all you do is a combination of these first two things.
Again, these judges are sitting cageside. The stats don't pop up on their screens in the middle of rounds. They saw Cannonier's vicious leg kicks and heard the thuds. They saw Strickland's head snap back the few times Cannonier landed, they looked at Cannonier swinging (and mostly missing) and moving forward almost the whole fight. I knew it would be close, but I had Cannonier winning the fight when the final bell rang.
He wasn't robbed. He fought like a guy who wanted to go to a decision. He got exactly that, and lost. He paid the price for using an underwhelming, oversimplistic strategy.