- Joined
- Oct 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,428
- Reaction score
- 17,700
CGI allows the producers to inflate thecan't believe they rarely use blood caps any more
CGI allows the producers to inflate thecan't believe they rarely use blood caps any more
yeah, it's crap. Cinema CGI hasn't topped practical effects ajn I actually think it's deteriorating . I can't get over that giant cartoon Octopus at the start of Doctor StrangeCGI allows the producers to inflate theexpensesbudget...
We for example then have flowchart then to talk with aggressor suspect and so on.Continuing to fire shots makes him still a deadly threat. We get a lot around here where suspect is barricaded but no one is in direct danger even though the suspect has weapons.
Police don't enter due to that creating the lethal risk that doesn't exist without an entry. Fatigue sets in on the suspect too. I'd hate for this to be an "easy out" option, as opposed to just continued waiting where no one is getting hurt.
I thought for sure those Dallas cops were gonna get in trouble for blowing that guy up.
They should totally use robots. It can keep police from risking their lives plus you can arm them with non-lethal weapons if you want.
Could have sworn they sent an armed robot in after him. Which started the fire
San Fran council approved a police petition to be able to use robots to defuse lethal force situations despite the objections of some in the community that expressed fears that the tools will be used on the poor in disproportionate numbers.
This comes in the wake of the first time a robot was used to take out a suspect in Dallas a few years ago. That suspect had shot five police officers and was taken out by a bomb robot armed with explosives.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/san-francisco-approval-police-deploy-deadly-lethal-robots/
I think anyone who’s armed and considered a threat to the public if he escapes is probably a candidate for justified robo-blasting.As in AI options or like a bomb squad robot controlled by remote that now has a handgun attached to take out a suspect rather than breaching with men?
Biggest concern I see is video and audio quality and angles being related to the pilot to get the whole story and if there are any other options.
Vast majority of police shoots are due to officer fearing for their safety. Remove the officer, and there goes that justification to shoot. And I doubt this thing is accurate enough for narrow window shots of hostage situations.
a suicide bomber holed up somewhere is about the only time I can see this being used ethically. Maybe a barricaded suspect who has already shot and killed officers attempting to breach, but even then, you just continue waiting him out with the seige.
edit: mass shooter with available targets outside their building (think Vegas shooter) I could see it being a possibility if human officers can’t get to the shooter due to some Booby trap or exposed choke point.
I saw it again recently for the first time since maybe the 90s?I have never seen that. I will have to check it out. Tom Selleck was great in just about everything but Mr. Baseball.
yeah, it's crap. Cinema CGI hasn't topped practical effects ajn I actually think it's deteriorating . I can't get over that giant cartoon Octopus at the start of Doctor Strange