• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Same sex marriage under review?

If you think that basic common sense dictates that having no parents is better than having gay parents then you either have a lot of hate in your heart or you're a moron. That's basic common sense.
Do you believe there are fates worse than death?
 
Sure, do you think having gay parents is a fate worse than death?
It could be depending on the parents, but most likely not. But staying in the system longer does not equal death.

Let me put it another way, say you’re walking in some bad part of town, all alone, and a strange man approaches you with a gun in his hand, and tells you to get on your knees and blow him. Now you could just do what he says to avoid getting shot, or you can take your chances and tell him to fuck off. Now he certainly might shoot you, and you might die or at least be wounded, but he also might not. What do you do?

Personally, I’ll take my chances with the gun, even though it seems like the potentially more harmful if not fatal option. Same if I was a child in the system, and the option is to be adopted by two gay men, or stay in the system in hopes that someone else might adopt me someday down the road, while knowing it may never happen, I’ll still take my chances.
 
:rolleyes:

"It was not immediately clear whether Trump was referring to nuclear-explosive testing, which would be carried out by the National Nuclear Security Administration, or flight testing of nuclear-capable missiles."

Totally couldn't be talking about testing the Minuteman ICBM's in response to the recent Russian tests... nah that couldn't be it, he is totally going to just start setting off nukes... *sigh* why do I bother walking into this den of retards?
lol how many times have we seen this “calm down guys he’s not being literal” bullshit only to be ignored later when it turns out he did mean it. Working on another fell for it again award
 
It could be depending on the parents, but most likely not. But staying in the system longer does not equal death.

Let me put it another way, say you’re walking in some bad part of town, all alone, and a strange man approaches you with a gun in his hand, and tells you to get on your knees and blow him. Now you could just do what he says to avoid getting shot, or you can take your chances and tell him to fuck off. Now he certainly might shoot you, and you might die or at least be wounded, but he also might not. What do you do?

Personally, I’ll take my chances with the gun, even though it seems like the potentially more harmful if not fatal option. Same if I was a child in the system, and the option is to be adopted by two gay men, or stay in the system in hopes that someone else might adopt me someday down the road, while knowing it may never happen, I’ll still take my chances.

Why are we using the analogy where being adopted by a gay couple is the equivalent of being asked to blow somebody. That's retarded.
 
Why are we using the analogy where being adopted by a gay couple is the equivalent of being asked to blow somebody. That's retarded.

Because that's how messed up the wiring is in his brain. I mean he is declaring that, regardless of how he was treated, he'd make the conscious decision to be a homophobic CHILD.
 
Why are we using the analogy where being adopted by a gay couple is the equivalent of being asked to blow somebody. That's retarded.
It’s a more extreme example, but potentially getting shot is more extreme than staying in the system, so the comparison still works.

Also, in some cases being adopted by the gay couple might indeed lead to you directly being forced to blow someone so even that extreme example is very possible in such a situation.
 
It’s a more extreme example, but potentially getting shot is more extreme than staying in the system, so the comparison still works.

Also, in some cases being adopted by the gay couple might indeed lead to you directly being forced to blow someone so even that extreme example is very possible in such a situation.

It's only "very possible" in the same way that it's "very possible" that you'll die in a car crash if you drive a car.
 
It’s a more extreme example, but potentially getting shot is more extreme than staying in the system, so the comparison still works.

Also, in some cases being adopted by the gay couple might indeed lead to you directly being forced to blow someone so even that extreme example is very possible in such a situation.

An actually correct example given that the chance of getting abused in the care system is higher is...

You work at the dick sucking factory, a guy offers you to go into a neighbourhood where you there's a very low percentage chance you'll end up sucking a dick but you probably won't. Do you choose to carry on working at the dick sucking factory or are you going to take your chances with the guy?
 
It could be depending on the parents, but most likely not. But staying in the system longer does not equal death.

Let me put it another way, say you’re walking in some bad part of town, all alone, and a strange man approaches you with a gun in his hand, and tells you to get on your knees and blow him. Now you could just do what he says to avoid getting shot, or you can take your chances and tell him to fuck off. Now he certainly might shoot you, and you might die or at least be wounded, but he also might not. What do you do?

Personally, I’ll take my chances with the gun, even though it seems like the potentially more harmful if not fatal option. Same if I was a child in the system, and the option is to be adopted by two gay men, or stay in the system in hopes that someone else might adopt me someday down the road, while knowing it may never happen, I’ll still take my chances.

How many hours a day would you say you spend thinking of scenarios where you're forced to blow other guys?

Between that, and bragging that men who have to pay for sex are the real men because they "understand women", you really aren't doing the cause any help brother. The goal is to convince the Dems that your objection to same-sex marriage isn't rooted in your own suppressed fantasies. Your post doesn't do that.
 
An actually correct example given that the chance of getting abused in the care system is higher is...

You work at the dick sucking factory, a guy offers you to go into a neighbourhood where you there's a very low percentage chance you'll end up sucking a dick but you probably won't. Do you choose to carry on working at the dick sucking factory or are you going to take your chances with the guy?
I disagree, I think there’s a higher chance you’ll end up sucking dick being raised by two flamers but think what you want. I know you’re one of those “ally of the community” types and I don’t give a shit, you can support any fucked up thing you want, just don’t lecture me on how I should view the world.

I guess that’s where I am, and have always been on the whole gay thing, I honestly don’t give a fuck what people do with their lives. As long as they’re consenting adults. But it’s people like you who attempt to shame someone just because they don’t agree with that lifestyle and insist that they celebrate and embrace it that has only made the rest of us more hostile to it.
 
I disagree, I think there’s a higher chance you’ll end up sucking dick being raised by two flamers but think what you want. I know you’re one of those “ally of the community” types and I don’t give a shit, you can support any fucked up thing you want, just don’t lecture me on how I should view the world.

I guess that’s where I am, and have always been on the whole gay thing, I honestly don’t give a fuck what people do with their lives. As long as they’re consenting adults. But it’s people like you who attempt to shame someone just because they don’t agree with that lifestyle and insist that they celebrate and embrace it that has only made the rest of us more hostile to it.

The only thing I'm shaming you for is not actually giving a shit about the safety of the children because you've said you'd be willing to leave them in an environment which is more dangerous than being adpoted by gay dudes.

You can like or dislike gay people. I don't give a fuck about that.
 
The only thing I'm shaming you for is not actually giving a shit about the safety of the children because you've said you'd be willing to leave them in an environment which is more dangerous than being adpoted by gay dudes.

You can like or dislike gay people. I don't give a fuck about that.
Ah, OK, this is where you pretend to give a shit about the kids, the same kids that you’re in favorite of aborting before they’re even born, right?
 
Skim without reading my breakdown, 100%



He said "equal basis" -- I am simply pointing out the whole thing is a terrible idea.

Everyone here hits reply, because they think it's a left/right thing, and never read.
Your breakdown based on a bloody MSN article? Fucking LOL.

You are assuming he is talking about setting off nukes rather than the delivery methods... apparently context isnt important to TDS sufferers :rolleyes:

"instructing the Pentagon to test the U.S. nuclear arsenal on an "equal basis" with other nuclear powers."

What do you think was meant by "equal basis with other nuclear powers" based in the context of Russia very publicly testing and bragging about nuclear capable missiles recently?

Are you aware of the Sentinal program? Yeah, probably not.

Is anyone else blowing up nuclear weapons currently? No. So what would "equal basis" mean if no-one else is setting off nukes currently? Don't let reality get in the way of your regularly scheduled Trump freakout though :rolleyes:

To reiterate my aforementioned point... den of retards.
 
Back
Top