Saffedine probably should of lost to Roger Bowling. Sorry if most of us don't buy him as a legit threat to Nate.
If Okami can beat Marquardt in a standup battle, Saffidiene should have a decent chance at it as long as he can stay upright and doesn't get caught with a big shot.
Marquardt has a size advantage on him and is a much more well rounded fighter, but stylistically it doesn't seem like a terrible matchup for Saffidiene who has good striking and takedown defense.
People don't want to admit it but Okami has good stand up these days. A good jab and solid movement he basically just lacks KO power. Okami would more than likely win a decision in a bout with Saffidiene if it was all stand up. He wouldn't just stand with him but if he did he would still win.
I wasn't putting down Okami. I agree Okami has good standup though he mostly uses it to force tie-ups. But so does Saffidiene. And yes Okami could probably beat Saffidiene in a standup fight but he's also effectively about 2 weight classes higher than him (larger-type MW vs smaller-type WW).
Wait what? You think Okami has better striking than Saffeidine?
If Okami can beat Marquardt in a standup battle, Saffidiene should have a decent chance at it as long as he can stay upright and doesn't get caught with a big shot.
Marquardt has a size advantage on him and is a much more well rounded fighter, but stylistically it doesn't seem like a terrible matchup for Saffidiene who has good striking and takedown defense.
Okami won because the threat of takedowns and his clinch game altered the way Nate had to fight. Good grapplers have more success striking against better strikers than expect all the time because of the threat of the takedown. Nate doesn't have to worry about this when fighting Tarec.