• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V9

Status
Not open for further replies.
<{JustBleed}><{JustBleed}><{JustBleed}>



Precisely because we are anti-war that we need Russia to lose, just like we needed the US to bleed in Iraq and realize invading a country unilaterally will not bring any glory.
Were you anti Iraq war? And anti Libyan destruction? And against arming jihadists in Syria?

if so, good for you.

we don’t need to be involved in any conflict.
 
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-military-forces-prepared-cross-into-ukraine

U.S. military forces are "fully prepared" to cross into Ukraine at a moment's notice to fight a war against Russia .

The Army's 101st Airborne Division, which boasts the "Screaming Eagles" moniker, has been deployed to Europe for the first time since World War II , practicing with live tank and artillery rounds not far from the Black Sea, across which Russia has taken territory from Ukraine, including Crimea, at a forward operating site on NATO's eastern flank, according to CBS News .

Brig. Gen. John Lubas, the division's deputy commander, stressed this is "not a training deployment" but rather a "combat deployment" from which his forces "need to be ready to fight tonight, depending on how the situation escalates across the border."

--

After the United States, United Kingdom and France unilaterally rejected Shoigu's attempted ground-laying for a 'dirty bomb', US are ready to deploy tonight if necessary.

It's clear what nuclear escalation of any scale means for Putin and his insane regime.


If we did, it would be a multi prong assult.

One from Romania, one from the Baltics, and a attack from poland
 
Honestly , what is going to happen in Kherson ? I’ve heard some crazy rumours in the last 48 hours.
 
Were you anti Iraq war? And anti Libyan destruction? And against arming jihadists in Syria?

Im pro invaders fucking around and finding out.

we don’t need to be involved in any conflict.

Quite fucking weird how helping the defender in a war of aggression is tantamount to supporting the aggressor in other wars.

Repeat with me

RUSSIA INVADED UKRAINE
UKRAINE IS A SOVEREIGN NATION
UKRAINE WAR IS EXISTENTIAL
RUSSIA CAN STOP THE WAR WHENEVER IT WANTS.
 
@aries
Post #8959, page: 448, V8:
"It's pretty clear that the US and it's allies could annihilate Russia in pretty short order. The only possible repercussion is the 'nuclear' threat which is most certainly a bluff.

Yes, the rest of NATO would want the US to lead but I've never seen the rest of NATO so resolute about any one issue. This isn't some Iraq invasion built on a flaky WMD claim or 'peacekeeping' in Afghanistan. I don't know the numbers but I've heard (from serving and ex-soldiers) there is quite a sizeable number of British soldiers going AWOL to help in Ukraine as well as many ex-soldiers. The British media are burying it though. I bet it's not just British soldiers either. As long as NATO sticks to pushing Russia out of Ukraine, there will be no risk of nuclear threat.

Everybody is now aware that NATO would decimate Russian forces, including Putin. As long as it's clear they just get out of Ukraine, and we aren't invading Russia, no one is using nukes."

-

It is one thing to fight to take another country most Russians don't give 'two-shits' about, a whole other animal when someone is invading your country. Russian conviction to defend the motherland would be as strong, if not stronger, than the current Ukrainian will to fight. This would now bring out the will to fight back that Russians had against the French and the Soviets against the Nazis. You would not have to ask for volunteers, they would join in droves.

All the British soldiers currently helping out in Ukraine are all retired. The British government has no active-duty soldiers on the ground in Ukraine. Same for American soldiers in Ukraine - all retired. I think you are underestimating the nuclear danger in this conflict. That is something no one knows for sure. Certainly not worth the risk. What makes you think Russia won't be concerned about a NATO invasion of Russia in defense of Ukraine (border-crossing)? Remember how the Chinese joined the North Koreans during the Korean war when the US got too close to the Chinese border. China managed to push US forces back South to the 38th parallel in 1953. It was a pretty good defeat for US forces. This after a great US victory in Europe and the Pacific theater in WWII. Both Russia and China are paranoid about their border.
269393a31495f658277d5d6628dd3232.jpg
Hey, you haven't posted a map of Bahkmut for the last couple of days,
You know the evidence that Russia is winning this war?
I wonder why
<{outtahere}>
 


How about you stop building Shit-72B3s and Focus on one model. Aka the T-90



Im pro invaders fucking around and finding out.



Quite fucking weird how helping the defender in a war of aggression is tantamount to supporting the aggressor in other wars.

Repeat with me

RUSSIA INVADED UKRAINE
UKRAINE IS A SOVEREIGN NATION
UKRAINE WAR IS EXISTENTIAL
RUSSIA CAN STOP THE WAR WHENEVER IT WANTS.
its astonishing that this has become the alt rights talking point. Like it’s so fucking dumb that it truly is jaw dropping. Yet so many of those “free thinkers” are parroting it. I guess the Ukrainians should just surrender and let their country be dissolved.
 
its astonishing that this has become the alt rights talking point. Like it’s so fucking dumb that it truly is jaw dropping. Yet so many of those “free thinkers” are parroting it. I guess the Ukrainians should just surrender and let their country be dissolved.

"You were against the US invading Iraq ergo you need to support Russia invading Ukraine or you are an hypocrite"

Where do they get this fucking logic.
 
Honestly , what is going to happen in Kherson ? I’ve heard some crazy rumours in the last 48 hours.

Nothing is going to happen. Just like they didn't do anything anywhere else.

Russia seems to not understand that they can only bluff until people adjust to their tactics(that time ended months ago). It's a lot like high stakes poker. Once people realize you bluff a disproportionate amount of time, you'll start getting called down and often with very mediocre hands. Russians have placed themselves in the corner.
 
The US warns of serious consequences if Russia uses dirty bombs
As previously mentioned here in the blog, Russia has claimed that Ukraine should have threatened to use so-called dirty bombs.

The US believes that this may be a sign that Russia itself is planning the use of such a weapon. This is written by Sky News.

The US State Department has warned strongly against the use of dirty bombs.

- We have been very clear to the Russians about the serious consequences that will follow nuclear use, says spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Ned Price and adds:

- There will be consequences for Russia, regardless of whether it uses a dirty bomb or a nuclear bomb.

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/live/2022-10-25-seneste-nyt-om-krigen-i-ukraine

Shit bout to get real?
 
Nothing is going to happen. Just like they didn't do anything anywhere else.

Russia seems to not understand that they can only bluff until people adjust to their tactics(that time ended months ago). It's a lot like high stakes poker. Once people realize you bluff a disproportionate amount of time, you'll start getting called down and often with very mediocre hands. Russians have placed themselves in the corner.
What I'm worried about is them blowing that dam
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top