International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V9

[Deleted member 585708]

If Puten is crazy enough and does nuke Ukraine, then what do we do? Do we intervene and go against a crazy mother fucker that has over 1000 nukes?

The US has already vowed to respond to a tactical nuclear weapon by eliminating all Russian units outside of Russia.

Petraeus: “Just to give you a hypothetical, we would respond by leading a Nato – a collective – effort that would take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea and every ship in the Black Sea.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/02/us-russia-putin-ukraine-war-david-petraeus

 

[7even]

The US has already vowed to respond to a tactical nuclear weapon by eliminating all Russian units outside of Russia.

Petraeus: “Just to give you a hypothetical, we would respond by leading a Nato – a collective – effort that would take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea and every ship in the Black Sea.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/02/us-russia-putin-ukraine-war-david-petraeus

Ok, but if he’s crazy enough to nuke Ukraine. Then what’s stopping him from sending an ICBM nuke to Manhattan?

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Ok, but if he’s crazy enough to nuke Ukraine. What’s stopping him from sending an ICBM nuke to Manhattan?

Bye bye Russia.

 

[7even]

Bye bye Russia.

Is that a risk you’re willing to take?

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Is that a risk you’re willing to take?

No.

That's why I wouldn't advocate Russia dropping a nuclear bomb on Ukraine.

That would be really fucking stupid.

 

[Rational Poster]

Is that a risk you’re willing to take?

Imagine if Saint Reagan was still here to hear you losers talk like this.

Reagan did one thing right. He did not put up with Russia's bullshit.

 

[7even]

Imagine if Saint Reagan was still here to hear you losers talk like this.

Reagan did one thing right. He did not put up with Russia's bullshit.

Where do you live? Are you close by to major city? Is Ukraine worth nuclear Armageddon? You’re fucking stupid.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

Where do you live? Are you close by to major city? Is Ukraine worth nuclear Armageddon? You’re fucking stupid.

You know Ukraine has major cities, right?

You moron.

 

[7even]

You know Ukraine has major cities, right?

You moron.

That’s your comeback? Let’s have the world get destroyed with Nukes over Ukraine. Ukraine is worth Nuclear Armageddon. Ok great.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

That’s your comeback? Let’s have the world get destroyed with Nukes over Ukraine. Ukraine is worth Nuclear Armageddon. Ok great.

Is America worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Russia worth nuclear Armageddon? No.

Is Europe worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Africa worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Asia worth nuclear Armageddon? No.

I don't need a comeback, it's ridiculous to ask any of these nonsensical questions.

If there's truly a person/people on the Earth that wish to become an existential threat to everyone on the planet, all 7-8 billion of us, then THEY risk being wiped off the face of the planet.

So far, that's not China; not America; not the UK, not Ukraine, not Japan, not South Africa, not Nigeria, but there's only one country threatening to use nukes.

That's Russia.

Luckily for you, and this debate, they won't use a nuke in Ukraine - but if they do, and if they really are dead set on becoming that aforementioned existential threat, then we'll weep for them when they are no more.

 

[Rational Poster]

Where do you live? Are you close by to major city? Is Ukraine worth nuclear Armageddon? You’re fucking stupid.

Were our ancestors fucking stupid when they stood up to these drunken bullies the last time?

The only reason they're even trying is because they know they have so many sympathetic selfish weasels like you.

 

[GhostZ06]

Ok, but if he’s crazy enough to nuke Ukraine. Then what’s stopping him from sending an ICBM nuke to Manhattan?

Considering we stated that, and I'm quoting, "we dont need nukes to take them out". And seeing they're shit performance in Ukraine...yyaaa

And they're corruption really screwed over the average Russian solider? its pretty bad

 

[7even]

Is America worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Russia worth nuclear Armageddon? No.

Is Europe worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Africa worth nuclear Armageddon? No. Is Asia worth nuclear Armageddon? No.

I don't need a comeback, it's ridiculous to ask any of these nonsensical questions.

If there's truly a person/people on the Earth that wish to become an existential threat to everyone on the planet, all 7-8 billion of us, then THEY risk being wiped off the face of the planet.

So far, that's not China; not America; not the UK, not Ukraine, not Japan, not South Africa, not Nigeria, but there's only one country threatening to use nukes.

That's Russia.

Luckily for you, and this debate, they won't use a nuke in Ukraine - but if they do, and if they really are dead set on becoming that aforementioned existential threat, then we'll weep for them when they are no more.

What’s so nonsensical about asking questions on the risk of nuclear annihilation? If you live through it, you would wish we would’ve never intervened. It’s a huge calculated risk. I wonder if you would retract from your statement if Putin is evil enough to use a nuke on Ukraine.

 

[Deleted member 585708]

What’s so nonsensical about asking questions on the risk of nuclear annihilation? If you live through it, you would wish we would’ve never intervened. It’s a huge calculated risk. I wonder if you would retract from your statement if Putin is evil enough to use a nuke on Ukraine.

What answer are you looking for?

I want the West to bow down to someone evil enough to use a nuke on Ukraine?

Why do you want that answer?

 

[7even]

Considering we stated that, and I'm quoting, "we dont need nukes to take them out". And seeing they're shit performance in Ukraine...yyaaa

And they're corruption really screwed over the average Russian solider? its pretty bad

Obviously we would destroy Russia in a conventional war. However, that won’t stop a mad man from firing nukes at us.

 

[Yehudim]

Imagine if Saint Reagan was still here to hear you losers talk like this.

Reagan did one thing right. He did not put up with Russia's bullshit.

He did a lot of things right. In fact, everything he did was right.

 

[7even]

What answer are you looking for?

I want the West to bow down to someone evil enough to use a nuke on Ukraine?

Why do you want that answer?

Nuclear holocaust isn’t worth over Ukraine. It’s why we haven’t intervened because of the risk. What makes you think the risk would be lower after he detonates a nuke? It’s a major fucking risk. Hypothetically speaking, if he does drop a nuke, then I wouldn’t be surprised if you reconsider on if we should declare war on Russia or not.

 

[GhostZ06]

 

[GhostZ06]

Jesus .....fucking Christ

 

[Rational Poster]

He did a lot of things right. In fact, everything he did was right.