- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 22,816
- Reaction score
- 12,949
You don't support war crimes, but you do support the Russian subjugation of Ukraine because you also don't support "democracy" lol
"Democracy"
You don't support war crimes, but you do support the Russian subjugation of Ukraine because you also don't support "democracy" lol
Yeah yeah, we know you don't think it's real democracy unless people enable your entitlement"Democracy"
Yeah yeah, we know you don't think it's real democracy unless people enable your entitlement
"Insurance companies are awful, therefore I support the destruction of Ukraine."The 68,000 people insurance companies slaughter every year must have deserved to die. They were being entitled.
"Insurance companies are awful, therefore I support the destruction of Ukraine."
This is you
Rank apologist nonsenseIf Boris Johnston didn't tear up the peace deal there would be no destruction of Ukraine.
But Ukraine shot down 74884 Russian planes (no proof, but it’s true!!)
Ukraine hasn't presented much credible evidence of Su-34 shot down claims in the past 3 weeks. Generally you have a few pic of the wrecks where you could geolocate it. To say they shot down 13 Su-34s within 2 weeks is quite an extraordinary claim.some of these arent fucking confirmed. Also launchers arent hard to replace.
![]()
Yeah, this isn't a videogame, Russia.
But Ukraine shot down 74884 Russian planes (no proof, but it’s true!!)
And Russia claims to have destroyed 200 himars launchers and 600 patriot systems and 350 f16s. Probably start to claim f22 and f35s for good measure.
<45>
You should reflect on that.Ukraine has had 39 HIMARS launchers. I do not know how Russia could have claimed to destroy 200.
The recent Patriot system lost can be attributed to Ukraine having to move the launchers closer in order to deter FAB glide bombs, which exposes them to greater risk.Bronk says the development of the glide bombs has given the Russians a way to use their tactical air force (as opposed to long-range bombers) more effectively after its limited role in the first phase of the war. He says the US Patriot complex is just about the only defense that has the range to counter the threat, but the Ukrainians have a limited number. And the missiles used by Patriots are in short supply given the delay in the US Congress passing a further package of military aid for Ukraine.
Please describe for us what stuff according to you is Patriot system and how you are defining pharse " all system destroyed " etc alike. The same btw about S-300 system.
The single most impactful weapon for Ukraine was HIMARS, which forced the Russians to disperse their forces causing them to attack in small batches rather than as concentrated armor push. In addition, it puts a heavy strain on their supply lines. The FAB glide bomb kits might become the most effective weapon for Russians in this war. Their planes can drop bombs up to 60km away from the frontline relatively safe from Ukrainian air defenses unlike before. These bombs are relatively accurate due to satellite guidance, and they pack a much heavier punch than artillery shells.
The recent Patriot system lost can be attributed to Ukraine having to move the launchers closer in order to deter FAB glide bombs, which exposes them to greater risk.