- Joined
- Sep 2, 2013
- Messages
- 4,233
- Reaction score
- 4,869
You're right they've been explicit in their aims from the beginning - keeping NATO out of Ukraine. They said there were red lines, USA crossed them. They said there were 'brightest red lines', USA crossed them too. Putin still tried to dodge conflict with the Minsk accords, they didn't work (Fra/Ger leaders now openly said they were 'just an excuse to buy time').
The easiest way for you to get it might be that shortly after the invasion, Putin again offered a peace treaty (amongst other things, which would keep Donbass in Ukraine). The Ukranians were ready to accept the treaty.
But the Americans blocked it. If America wanted peace, why would they block a peace treaty that the Ukrainians were willing to accept? - because they wanted the war. It really is that simple. What other reason?
Now it's clear they can't destabilise/cause regime change in Russia via this route any more, Nudelman has resigned and USA is going to throw Ukraine away. Expect an increase in anti-China articles to start taking its place.
Tortured logic with little base in reality. Ukraine and its people have agency over their own desire to either be a Russian vassal or another successful country allied with the west. They made their choice and Russia invaded. This scenario has been repeated since the fall of the soviet union several times. At each instance these post soviet allies and countries choose the west...the reasons need not be explained as it is obvious.
The easiest way for you to understand this is to look at what has transpired vs what has been said. Ukraine chose to move west and Russia invaded instead of losing another country to the west. You fail to understand that NATO is not moving east but former Russian satellites are running west.
You can't idiotically claim the US wanted war when it was the Russians that invaded....even at their own insistence they would not...its just asinine to make this claim