• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V14

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that unless the crazies get elected that even a "normal" person in the right wing would still support Ukraine. Don't forget that it's less than one year until the U.S. Presidential election and that you're going to see a lot more craziness (to get votes) in this timeframe.

Yeah, hopefully so.

I was reading a while back that it's extremely unlikely that Republicans cut out funding for Ukraine.

I think they'll flirt with the idea, and possibly cause a couple of delays, perhaps, but ultimately Trump won't fulfill his 'promise' of ending the war on his first day in office by withdrawing support.

That's just not a scenario based in the real world.

He'd probably have to go the other way and really lay it on Putin - but I think everyone knows Trump's deranged 'day one' fantasy is just spoken word performance art as usual.
 
David Axelrod is predicting Biden will drop out of 2024 race. If that happens I think Newsom or Harris will be front runners.

RFK Jr is the wildcard and his presence as an independent swings Biden/Trump numbers in a big way towards Biden.

Hopefully US continues to support Ukraine regardless who's in charge.
 
The situation with Slovakia isn't simple.
They does have land border with Ukraine and therefore can't deplete their current stockpile too much.
They really had gave a lot and doesn't matter old or new models, Soviet style equipment Ukr might had used immediately cos didn't needed training for long months.
Slovakia also had gave them some Mig 29 and S-300 system where Ukr too had trained perssonel therefore might been used immediately.
Undisclosed number of S-300 missiles etc stuff.

They does have budget deficit and so on.

Therefore ofc promise that money will not be spent for Ukr was good card ♦️ to get votes in elections.

Private contractors and money paid by Ukr looks that is different thing for them.
 
Not how it works bucko. A sovereign nation can do whatever the fuck it wants with its own territory. Ukraine doesn't want Russian troops near its border either, but for some reason you only care about what Russia wants.

you're comparing apples and oranges

ukraine can have its on troops, but hosting nato troops is direct provocation and threat to russia.

kiev comedian chose the role if nato puppet at the expanse of his people and country
 

I have read two different accounts.

One account of what he said framed it as a prediction of what will happen.

Another account is being framed as Biden 'should'. I just searched for articles and it is being framed as the latter.

So maybe he was initially misquoted or misunderstood. It does seem they are also massaging the messaging over the last day or so with the specific language.
 
I have read two different accounts.

One account of what he said framed it as a prediction of what will happen.

Another account is being framed as Biden 'should'. I just searched for articles and it is being framed as the latter.

So maybe he was initially misquoted or misunderstood. It does seem they are also massaging the messaging over the last day or so with the specific language.

For sure.

Appreciate the insight, dude, I hadn't heard that until you brought it up.
 
youve been crying for 4 threads.

you haven't had any contributing facts, but only non-sense. An finding ways to derail the thread.

Shape up.

says the guy sharing videos of some russian blown up equipment while ignoring what's actually going on...

you still ignore the situation in adiivka?
 



Now if they could get T-64s and T-72 across..
 
"reported by nato"

yeah, thats sounds "reliable"

And all Swedish news.
It was actually a real thing.
But only RT and TASS counts....
Derp
Or should we go on with all the times Russian fighters has violated Swedish airspace?

Does the Swedish Armed forces and left leaning state media news count?
This was another example from the same year 2013.

"Russian bombers have again conducted offensive exercises in the Baltic Sea. It happened last week and one of the targets was Öland's southern cape. This is now revealed by the Swedish Armed Forces to SVT Nyheter."

For being a peace loving country ....
Why train attacks on a country that at the time was not interested in joining NATO?
What has Russia done to come closer to their Baltic neighbors? For peace loving they sure seems... hostile.

When these "training attacks" happened in 2013 voices of concern was raised in Sweden about starting to spend big on military again....

"After SVT's revelation that Russian bombers carried out offensive exercises in the Baltic Sea, Defense Academy's expert believes that Sweden must consider strengthening its defense capabilities."

Does that seem like something you would feel the need to do if your neighbor is a peace loving country that just want to be left alone?
 
Last edited:
I suspect that grim baller is account to keep site going OR just low paid Serbian shill.

All these arguments how cool is Russia.
Not a coincidence, both Serbia and Russia does have proven track record to invade neutral countries...
Constant lying, genocide, mandatory russification.

It is waste of time too discuss with Lavrov farm trolls like he.

Kiev had founded Moscow and therefore there is term Muscowites.
Later muscowites expanded by using the same tactique like they are using now.
Russian Federation alone mainly is bunch with territories subjugated by muscowites.
For example Yakutia : mandatory russification, natural resources exploiting : gold, diamonds, condensate..
Chukotka: the same flowchart and gold, tin, coal....
Siberian tribes too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lsa
Arestantowich had promoted idea that Putin will invade to prevent Ukraine to join NATO while this anyway had been impossible......mainstream media consumers are dumb and lazy. Therefore grim baller is posting this shit and earning paychecks....

Bonus of neutrality Moldova had to taste 31 year in row: part of territory controlled by gang with terrorists funded by Kremlin...
This is reason why Moldova doesn't have normal investments and is poor country.
Also this alone is huge factor to be considered by EU and NATO ...cos IF UKr will be accepted, they will ask funding for border control and to install supervising troops on the border with separatists controlled area in Moldova.
 
you're comparing apples and oranges

ukraine can have its on troops, but hosting nato troops is direct provocation and threat to russia.

kiev comedian chose the role if nato puppet at the expanse of his people and country

God you are such a pathetic putin boot licker..

You are the guy who uses "she was asking for it" excuse when defending a rapist.

Who Ukraine allies itself with is none of Putins business, period. He doesn't get to control what his neighbours do, and given his past aggression towards his neighbours its perfectly understandable why every country in Europe now seeks NATO membership
 
Last edited:
God you arr such a pathetic putin boot licker..

You are the guy who uses "she was asking for it" excuse when defending a rapist

sure, sure you can spin it all you want

this is like you wanting to join a violent gang and your neighbour tell you "if you join that gang, i will feel threatened and will have to act before that happens"

if, after multiple warnings, you still try to join that gang then you provoked that situation, not your neighbour trying to protect his property
 
And all Swedish news.
It was actually a real thing.
But only RT and TASS counts....
Derp
Or should we go on with all the times Russian fighters has violated Swedish airspace?

Does the Swedish Armed forces and left leaning state media news count?
This was another example from the same year 2013.

"Russian bombers have again conducted offensive exercises in the Baltic Sea. It happened last week and one of the targets was Öland's southern cape. This is now revealed by the Swedish Armed Forces to SVT Nyheter."

For being a peace loving country ....
Why train attacks on a country that at the time was not interested in joining NATO?
What has Russia done to come closer to their Baltic neighbors? For peace loving they sure seems... hostile.

When these "training attacks" happened in 2013 voices of concern was raised in Sweden about starting to spend big on military again....

"After SVT's revelation that Russian bombers carried out offensive exercises in the Baltic Sea, Defense Academy's expert believes that Sweden must consider strengthening its defense capabilities."

Does that seem like something you would feel the need to do if your neighbor is a peace loving country that just want to be left alone?

swedish news just reporting what nato claims... great!

also gotta love how "russia is aggressive" meanwhile in real world

hq2sp7atgxa91.jpg


iCz6NpR.jpg


russia is definitely the aggressive one here

look how close they put their country to us bases
 
sure, sure you can spin it all you want

this is like you wanting to join a violent gang and your neighbour tell you "if you join that gang, i will feel threatened and will have to act before that happens"

if, after multiple warnings, you still try to join that gang then you provoked that situation, not your neighbour trying to protect his property

Lol, completely delusional...

Joining NATO is "joining violent gang" says the fucking Putin apologist. The neighbor "feeling threatened and acting before it happens" in your warped mind is "breaking into your house and killing you, without you doing anything wrong". Fucking delusional.

No shit for brains... A better example would be living next to a psychopath (Russia) with a history of breaking into his neighbors houses (see Georgia) as well as your own (see 2014 Crimea), who then threatens to break into your house again and murder you if you "provoke" him by getting a gun to defend yourself.

Fuck off Russian shill, you are the worst human.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top