Either journalists failed or the fbi withheld evidence and information there is no in between. The story hasn't even been told. So whose fault is it? Also I kinda think Russell may have done this stuff, just to be half on topic.
There’s no medical records, no police reports
There are medical records from a rape clinic on the same day a victim text Brand "No means no" and he apologized. I'm sure that's just pure coincidence.
You clearly didn't read the article. It's from an instance of sexual assault that he didn't use a condom for allegedly. He also did remove his condom during sex once, which is also textbook rape in most jurisdictions.
I did not say that. What their laws do do however is having a chilling effect on investigative journalism, which means if a major outlet is willing to publish something like this, they are incredibly confident in it.
We aren't talking about tabloids, we are talking about one of their preeminent major papers.
Stealthing is literally, by the book rape, punishable by up to a life sentence. Do you also not believe a bank robbery happens when it's reported on by a media outlet, or is the skepticism only in cases of alleged rape?
They're on the back end and simply broadcasting the Times' work. Let's make this super simple. Why hasn't Brand sued if these text messages are fabricated or out of context? He's had two weeks to do so.
If they haven't started taking people down by now they will never start. The black book and hard drives will likely disappear if they haven't already. I hope I'm wrong but I feel like I know I'm not.
Did any of them have medical records from a rape clinic or the messages we have?
He's had 2 weeks to file, if the messages were so obviously false he would have sued already. HE's had no problem suing in the past, hence all the blind items over the years.
Because they just started criminal investigations and it's not clear any of these women want to go through a trial even. I'm sure you also think OJ Simpson was innocent?
It's not prejudging to point out the very obvious conclusion of, based on the contemporaneous evidence we've been presented with and that not one, but four women are making accusations of sexual assault, the case has all the makings of credible one.
ring was comprised of international billionares, I'm sure most would have fled anywhere the US law can reach the moment the story broke. Most of them probably aren't as dumb as prince Andrew.Again, you only have this standard for rape. It's a you issue.
There would be no prep work required if those messages were fabricated. Again, you seem dead set on coming up with an elaborate conspiracy that requires the participation of dozens, if not hundreds of people, rathe than the simpler and pretty clear explanation of Russel Brand was a creep.
You're the one tying guilt or cupability to criminal justice outcomes. They are related, but in no ways the same.
https://www.science.org/content/article/whale-pop-songs-spread-across-ocean
Given that it's impossible for cultural tastes to change over time without manipulation by shadowy elites, I wonder who is behind that?
Also: https://www.etymonline.com/word/culture
So again: in your mind, it's either a complete coincidence that Brand apologized, from his own phone number, to a women who accused him of not taking "no means no" at face value on the same day she went to a rape clinic, or those records were all fabricated. You're in the fever swamps of looniness if you see that and then decide those two options are more likely than it simply being a factual event. You can't even explain why dozens of people and a respected publication would sign up to lose a multimillion pound lawsuit here by fabricating a story.
Yes, balls in his court. That he's not doing anything or even denying the validity of the correspondences speaks volumes. You're telling me a multimillionaire can't find a good lawyer and forensics consultant and serve notice in 2 weeks when his livelihood is on the line? Come on.
