- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,143
- Reaction score
- 15,158
"grievances" would be a more apt and honest description I think.
Law russell brand allegations
- Thread starter ICHEERTHEBULL
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
It's probably an American thing. American rightists mostly don't agree with their own party about policy and many are entirely driven by opposition to what they see as mainstream culture. So they vote for people who are monomaniacally focused on cutting taxes and regs for rich people, but they see themselves as rebels fighting the man because they promote crazy CTs. So they're happy to embrace someone with stated leftist views as long as they are aligned against the reality-based community.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
"Peeves" may be better.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 13,812
for how long? if they actually cared about metoo and human tracking it would still be front page news 4 years later and they would have coordinated to create campaigns demanding answers but they didn't and won't cause they're controlled by the very elites that want it covered up.
the complete lack of action by the media on the biggest story of the century tells you all you need to about who they really are.
brand and tate and all the other pile-ons reek of fuckery and Fake News.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,143
- Reaction score
- 15,158
That sort of minimizes it, but maybe that's just a reflection on how I use the words colloquially myself. Trump is good at engaging people's belief in there own supposed righteous anger, and then leading them around on a leash to achieve his own ends. He's a sociopath, and a pretty skilled one.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 17,384
- Reaction score
- 21,584
I can't believe so many people are willing to completely believe anonymous accusations so early in the game. The accusing article couldn't even get their shit straight with presenting undoctored text messages. That is amateur hour.
And then we're just supposed to believe they "verified" all the evidence. In what way did they verify? And just believe 100% a one sided article? We haven't even heard his defense yet to all the individual allegations.
Just bizarre that people keep falling for the same trap. Why not just wait until more evidence?
And then we're just supposed to believe they "verified" all the evidence. In what way did they verify? And just believe 100% a one sided article? We haven't even heard his defense yet to all the individual allegations.
Just bizarre that people keep falling for the same trap. Why not just wait until more evidence?
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
I don't think a lot of his fans (putting aside the rich people who just want more pro-rich-people policy) have specific concerns or grievances, but there is a kind of inchoate rage at the world among a lot of them.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,963
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Sure. I don't think it's that likely, but it's possible this will fall apart. It's just disappointing that so many people are willing to rush to his defense because he's a CTer.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,673
- Reaction score
- 13,575
He’s also spoken very harshly of the COVID lockdowns/response, and I believe he’s against some of the WEF stuff, as well.
Mega-chud confirmed.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 13,812
when they bury the biggest scandal in history and get outraged over a tiny one, regardless of the story you know they're full of shit.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 62,489
- Reaction score
- 132,680
And that's relevant... how?
Hard to judge the authenticity of evidence when the media corporation that claims they're in posession of said evidence won't present it publicly.
Very much reminescent of the Democrats were claiming the DOJ were in posession of undeniable proof that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 26,143
- Reaction score
- 15,158
In this case, the accused has a skeezy past. I actually think it's a shame, because Brand seems to genuinely be on a better path in life now obviously.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 17,384
- Reaction score
- 21,584
People constantly do this on both sides. Fans or anti-establishment automatically believe him. Feminists or Believe All Women crowd automatically believe any story supporting the woman.
Uhmm - why not just be objective and base it on verified evidence or info. Can't stand this society where everything is trial by media or social media.
And the thing with anonymous accusations is this - if it's false, you can't even sue the accuser for defamation because you don't know who they are. You can't challenge their credibility. You can't challenge the facts. No one to even challenge.
That's why anonymous accusations are worthless. But totally open to realizing Brand is guilty if more info comes out.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
- Messages
- 29,944
- Reaction score
- 14,452
Why aren't right wing media outlets still covering it then champ ?for how long? if they actually cared about metoo and human tracking it would still be front page news 4 years later and they would have coordinated to create campaigns demanding answers but they didn't and won't cause they're controlled by the very elites that want it covered up.
the complete lack of action by the media on the biggest story of the century tells you all you need to about who they really are.
brand and tate and all the other pile-ons reek of fuckery and Fake News.
Let me explain why (pretend I'm speaking very slowly for you) that's simply not how the media works , people lose interest and other stories take precedence, it's all about eyeballs,if they were still covering Epstein regularly they would be getting fecking killed .
The Epstein story was front and center for quite awhile including a hit Netflix doc , after Maxwell didn't have much to say the story died
No wacka doodle CT necessary.
People sleep with "ugly people" all the time, consensually and without consent. Saying Russell Brand had his pick of women has no bearing on whether he is likely to be a rapist or not.
So again. You think that the evidence is fabricated? And that somehow dozens of people were all on board with career suicide and losing a libel lawsuit where they would have to prove their evidence is valid? Explain to me why dozen of people are on board with that. Like...why would a legal counsel sign off on publication in your conspiracy theory.
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 55,610
- Reaction score
- 38,587
You literally defended a guy who made a video about moving to a different Country because rape allegations were harder to prove, who then got arrested in THAT Country.
Your perspective is clear. Anyone who doesnt tell you what you want to hear is fake.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2005
- Messages
- 8,614
- Reaction score
- 5,018
You're straight up wrong on that one. He can sue the newspaper if the allegations turn out to be false. He's done it before.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/may/08/russell-brand-sun-on-sunday
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 17,384
- Reaction score
- 21,584
I know you can sue the paper. I'm talking about the false accusers.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2020
- Messages
- 7,033
- Reaction score
- 13,812
both sides should.
fuck "it's about the eyeballs". they have a powerful platform, if they were actual journalists they'd demand answers. you make it sound like these are junk tabloids and if they are then why put any stock into what they have to say about brand or anybody else?
i can't believe the amount of people here shilling for a system that buried the biggest child trafficking scandal in history so they can focus on relative bullshit.
