RIP GirlsDoPorn

[Big Al's Texas BBQ]

Same smile. Yep.

Huh?

 

[Jack Stevonovich]

I just dont care as it is irrelevant to my interest .

nah, you have a vested interest in 'not understanding' where they are coming from to act holier than though. If you did see where they are coming from then the resolution wouldn't allow you to pull the hollier than though charade but actually address the conflict.

 

[franklinstower]

nah, you have a vested interest in 'not understanding' where they are coming from to act holier than though. If you did see where they are coming from then the resolution wouldn't allow you to pull the hollier than though charade but actually address the conflict.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Huh?

She was pretty at ease there on the bed.. No pun intended.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Huh?

Oh and sorry I meant to quote the person that posted the pic. My bad.

 

[Jack Stevonovich]

Yeah, it's possible that they are victims of a scam AND pulling a hustle to reclaim themselves from victomhood and that some of them screwed over their boyfriends in the process.

Screwing over their boyfriends doesn't justify the scam the pornographers were pulling and those dudes deserve to be punished. I have no issue with those chicks getting paid. Those girls were operating under false pretenses.

You are deliberately not seeing the point of contention between your position and theirs because it suits you and how you would like to see yourself.

 

[franklinstower]

Yeah, it's possible that they are victims of a scam AND pulling a hustle to reclaim themselves from victomhood and that some of them screwed over their boyfriends in the process.

Screwing over their boyfriends doesn't justify the scam the pornographers were pulling and those dudes deserve to be punished. I have no issue with those chicks getting paid. Those girls were operating under false pretenses.

You are deliberately not seeing the point of contention between your position and theirs because it suits you and how you would like to see yourself.

Why dont you tell me what point I am not seeing? While you are at it tell me who "they" are too. Be specific.

 

[Jack Stevonovich]

Why dont you tell me what point I am not seeing?

well, you saw it. Their argument is based on their views on prostitution. When you pretend like you don't see the legal loophole porn provides for what is essentially prostitution it makes you seem disingenuous. It just makes you come off as holier than though rather than trying to resolve the conflict. Which implies you do not want to resolve the conflict because you need them so you can see yourself as holier than though.

 

[franklinstower]

well, you saw it. Their argument is based on their views on prostitution. When you pretend like you don't see the legal loophole porn provides for what is essentially prostitution it makes you seem disingenuous. It just makes you come off as holier than though rather than trying to resolve the conflict. Which implies you do not want to resolve the conflict because you need them so you can see yourself as holier than though.

Who are "they"? Ive dialogue with a lot of people in this thread in case you haven't noticed....

As far as prostitution there is no conflict. Porn is not prostitution.

But that is beside the point because if it is prostitution or it not is completely irrelevant to the case under scrutiny.


The people involved in this fraudulent exploitative scam are criminals that preyed on these women. Its still wrong if you prey on prostitutes even though these women were not prostitutes.

 

[Jack Stevonovich]

Who are "they"? Ive dialogue with a lot of people in this thread in case you haven't noticed....

As far as prostitution there is no conflict. Porn is not prostitution.

But that is beside the point because if it is prostitution or it not is completely irrelevant to the case under scrutiny.


The people involved in this fraudulent exploitative scam are criminals that preyed on these women. Its still wrong if you prey on prostitutes even though these women were not prostitutes.

Reread my first response. You created a false equevelancy of them supporting the pornographers as a strawman to build up how you would like to see yourself in relation to. Which is based on a logical fallacy.

The logical fallacy implies that you need to see them that way to see yourself a certain way and it comes across as disingenuous. Beyond that it perpetuates the underlying issue of exploitation because if that were to be resolved you would lose the esteem you hold yourself in and undercuts anyone who actually would like these forms of exploitation to actually be addressed.

 

[franklinstower]

Reread my first response. You created a false equevelancy of them supporting the pornographers as a strawman to build up how you would like to see yourself in relation to. Which is based on a logical fallacy.

I just cant follow your logic or language here. Ive noticed you struggle sometimes to make really clear points when its late. I think you have been drinking.


Some people in this thread were cendeming the women and saying they did bot deeerve the settlements they recieved because they knew what they were getring into and were prostitutes.

Yet none of the women knew what they were getting into or deserved what happened to them. That's why some of these perpetrators are now in jail and another has fled the country.

 

[Jack Stevonovich]

I just cant follow your logic or language here. Ive noticed you struggle sometimes to make really clear points when its late. I think you have been drinking.

You have equated not being able to follow my logic to thinking I am drunk. That is a false equivalency that you have used to attack a strawman, the imaginary drunk person. To create the strawman you made an ad hominem attack against me to justify it under the pretense of empathy which is disingenuous.

"False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which two incompatible arguments appear to be logically equivalent when in fact they are not. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence​

"A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man"."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] The terms ad mulierem[3] and ad feminam[4] have been used specifically when the person receiving the criticism is female.

Fallacious ad hominem reasoning is categorized among informal fallacies,[5][6][7] more precisely as a genetic fallacy, a subcategory of fallacies of irrelevance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

 

[mmamxfan]

I don't know the percentage, but it was a site for affairs.

My sister was caught on that site by her hubby. I didn't care one bit I was glad she did. Her husband was an abusive Candian/ Filipino manlet who put her up to it to benefit his business.

 

[SandaKicker]

The transcripts that were posted months ago in a different thread did not read like that at all. They hired other chicks to call these girls while they were still at home to make them feel more comfortable about doing porn -before they ever flew anywhere or went anywhere to do it.

Well these videos will probably be on the internet for the rest of these women’s lives so I think that’s punishment enough.

It’s also pretty much 100% that they won’t get a cent of that money given that the defendant’s are on the run for serious crime.

 

[mmamxfan]

Name?

I've heard that is her brother. That pic was taken before he left to go overseas.

 

[CI]

Name?

https://www.instagram.com/selena.green.vargas/
Unfortunately her account is private.


Thats where I found the name(in the comments section).

Your welcome.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Porn is not prostitution.

of course it is.
why wouldn't it be? cause they pay taxes for sucking dick for money?
grow up.

 

[Oblivian]

Lol I remember the old thread where people acted as though they didn't have a case. It was abundantly clear that they did if they actually read the details.

 

[SandaKicker]

https://www.instagram.com/selena.green.vargas/
Unfortunately her account is private.


Thats where I found the name(in the comments section).

Your welcome.

Interesting video, started watching a few more of that Birdman's guy video's.

Stumbled on this one, this might be the creepiest guy I've ever seen interviewed;



WTF, I wonder if the more cynical guys have any sympathy for this woman. This is fucked up in the extreme.

 

[Alphaboy]

https://www.instagram.com/selena.green.vargas/
Unfortunately her account is private.


Thats where I found the name(in the comments section).

Your welcome.

Jesus Christ, her IG bio says...

"Before you judge me, make sure you're perfect"

<45><45><45>

That's one of those thot quotes like "oNlY gOd cAn jUdGe mE"

The mental gymnastics whores will use to justify their behavior.