- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 37,051
- Reaction score
- 49,126
sounds to me like you're describing a bloated system, that has grown so much to allow absolutely irrelevant "classes" that people get grants to teach because it fits a certain academic narrative of "progressive values" where any subject is equal to others. i can just invent one on the spot, say "the history of strawberries and the struggle of black women in early 20th century america" and it fits the idiotic worldview of academic relevance and might even get a grant for it.But no one is using these things to wedge break the country except the people who keep telling you that "They're trying to wedge break the country!!"
When I was in college I took an elective on blaxploitation film. I needed a liberal arts credit, I didn't want to wake up early and the idea of watching movies for a class seemed like an easy A. It was taught by a TA or grad student, someone who needed the teaching experience and was probably using it to pay for their grad school.
Nowadays, someone would jump on the internet going insane about how the blaxploitation course wastes university resources, drives a wedge between people, asking "why do they need a blaxploitation course anyway, can't it be covered in a regular film class", and host of other empty bullshit that serves no purpose but to, as you put it, create a "wedge to break up the country".
But at the time? No one fucking cared. It was a one semester class, it filled a requirement and was unlikely to be filled up like other courses.
To me, it was as valuable as the random "Sports & Economics" course I took another year. Meaning it didn't fuck matter so long as it helped me meet my course load requirements.
Wedge, lol. Think about this question: If no one brought your attention to this course being offered at probably 1 university in the entire world -- how would it have been used as a wedge? It fucking wouldn't. You nor I wouldn't know it existed. But someone, somewhere out there, found this non-issue course and is making you pay attention to it.
Who's more likely to be trying to drive a wedge in the country? The people at the university who offered the course? Or the people who are using it to fuel social media engagements?
what it actually means is waste - these spots in today's academia can only be filled by retarded activists (the non retarded ones work at disney), and by simply being present they lower the quality of education.