Has he indicated that people should never be on SSRIs? Or that they are always ineffective? My view, and it is not outrageous, is that SSRIs are overprescribed and that diet, exercise and being outdoors can actually help a good portion of the population that is dependent on chemical interventions. Furthermore, that goes double for SSRIs in youth where a lifetime of dependence is going to happen when that prescription is made.
It’s frustrating that such a negative reaction to RFK and Trump is causing the left to be on the side of big pharma. There is a HUGE issue with over prescription across the board. Big Pharma is subject to huge litigation due to this and it’s sad that people will now turn a blind eye because the opposing team is against them.
SSRIs and opioids can be beneficial or detrimental but I will never trust the machine and will always believe when profits are at stake, they are being pushed more than they need to be.
To your second point, were they SSRIs? If not, why even bring it up? Do you deny SSRIs cause dependence? It’s very clearly laid out in the literature that they do. It’s inarguable so I don’t understand what point your making here.
Lastly, I’ve not defended or made excuses. I agreed he shouldn’t have said addictive. I’m pointing out that “are addictive” and “cause dependency” can be interchangeable to the average person.