"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

And why do both parents have to work?

Because those at the top have conspired to crush the middle class and make a single-income household unrealistic for all but the well off.
The rigid ideal of the male breadwinner and female housekeeper is something that emerged in the post WWII era of unprecedented prosperity. It wasn't the norm before as women did have to work. In fact I'd go as far as to say the women who didn't work were the exception because they happened to be lucky enough to be upper class while lower class women often worked. Granted it was work from the home many times like peasant wives working at the farm or urban women staying home to craft some household product to be sold. But they might also work outside the home as well as secretaries or teachers. Working didn't prevent or discourage them from starting a family. In fact it was often because they had a family with children that they went off to find work.

What you're saying isn't necessarily wrong to be fair but its also not the only factor at play. With education becoming increasingly important women are spending their prime birthing years getting their degrees and establishing their careers.

I think as a society we need to make motherhood as easy as possible as well as facilitating family planning to dissuade those who aren't ready for motherhood(teenagers, the destitute etc) from having children. Ironically that 2nd idea is more liberal that often finds resistance from pro-family conservative types. It would also work to towards the interests of the "white genocide" people since teenage pregnancy is more common among minority communities than whites and the sort of career oriented young woman who stays single is more likely to be white, though I don't quite care for those folks and their conspiracies.
 
Look, you are a waste of time. Either provide this example you keep yapping on about as it would apparently be some great victory for you.
Or
We will just go with the reality that this is basically saying you had sex with veronica vaughn...it never happened. But I am sure you can imagine what it would be like.

You are like some little boy who never met his dad and he desperately wants his dad's approval. Well, I am your dad in this case and you ain't getting my approval. Now, I hate empty posting and post whoring so I have to stop this conversation as it is a waste of my time. PS don't forget to send me a father's day card.

:p

toodles

This was so harsh it would burn like the dickens, it really would, except you're actually the one that sought me out and started the conversion. As is the case every time.


Seriously, you're terrible at this.
 
People also seem to forget that white-owned black slaves were generally not sold by whites, and were very rarely captured by whites.
True but initially slavery on the African continent was much rarer before the Europeans arrived. Slavery was used as a punishment for individuals who committed heinous crimes like muder or for PoWs. The huge increase in demand for slaves the Europeans caused lead the Africans to make slavery the punishment for increasingly lesser crimes and to incentivize tribes to go to war specifically for capturing slaves or to go on slaving raids.

Edit: Rarer isn't the best word. Its more that the scale increased exponentially rather than the practice spreading since it was commonplace in Africa before Europeans arrived.
 
Last edited:
With the caveat that somebody hires them and they are qualified. A quick search shows that Thrasher has won the LGTB Journalist of the year award and has appeared in the New York Times. This is not just some guy. He's a reputable journalist publishing blatantly racist material, and he will go by unscathed. This is a double standard, and it's why people are rightfully perturbed.


Come on, you don't consider the LGTB journalist award a reputable thing, and neither do i.

I too looked him up, and he's an opinion piece writer. Opinion, not reporter. Just like forum posters, there's no standard or fact or lack of bias.


And we all commiserate with people being perturbed by deplorable racism.
But the reaction should be"fuck that guy", and even everyone who agreea with him, not "fuck minorities", which is when we start to speak up.


These guys are not the voice of their people, just because they have a voice.
 
Come on, you don't consider the LGTB journalist award a reputable thing, and neither do i.

I too looked him up, and he's an opinion piece writer. Opinion, not reporter. Just like forum posters, there's no standard or fact or lack of bias.


And we all commiserate with people being perturbed by deplorable racism.
But the reaction should be"fuck that guy", and even everyone who agreea with him, not "fuck minorities", which is when we start to speak up.


These guys are not the voice of their people, just because they have a voice.

Woah, I don't know who would resort to eye-for-an-eye retribution in the form of disparaging minorities, but that's clearly not the answer.

I think we are on the same page, with the exception that I think that for the sake of consistency this guy should be held to the same level outrage and consequences as anyone would be if the races were reversed. It's a sad day when the media is openly racist.
 
Only if you want to spoil your children all the time. It really isn't difficult to take care of 2-3 children, financially... IF you do it correctly. Answer: don't spoil your children, turning them into little brats who have everything handed to them.

How many do you got and what do you do for a living?
 
You have to go with an initiated "cataphile" though, if you are lucky enough to know one.

We went with my GF's cousin, who has been down there 70 times. Some people develop an obsession for it, apparently.

You can really be in deep sh1t if you get lost in there or if something happens to you, because you are completely isolated from "the surface" and I can imagine that you might not meet anyone for days. It's a huge labyrinth.

Neat, thats some Theseus shit right there.
 
True but initially slavery on the African continent was much rarer before the Europeans arrived. Slavery was used as a punishment for individuals who committed heinous crimes like muder or for PoWs. The huge increase in demand for slaves the Europeans caused lead the Africans to make slavery the punishment for increasingly lesser crimes and to incentivize tribes to go to war specifically for capturing slaves or to go on slaving raids.

True, and not true. Europeans introduced the idea of Africans enslaving and selling other Africans, but only because Islamic Arabs (to the best of our knowledge) didn't present that option, since Arabs had a lower opinion of black Africans than Europeans did, and they stuck to raiding rather than trading.

Slavery was, by no means, rare before the arrival of Europeans and had existed on the continent for near a thousand years before the arrival of Europeans.
 
Last edited:
True but initially slavery on the African continent was much rarer before the Europeans arrived. Slavery was used as a punishment for individuals who committed heinous crimes like muder or for PoWs. The huge increase in demand for slaves the Europeans caused lead the Africans to make slavery the punishment for increasingly lesser crimes and to incentivize tribes to go to war specifically for capturing slaves or to go on slaving raids.

This is simply untrue. Slavery was huge in Africa, long before white people arrived. Its true that Coastal tribes began making raids inland in order to acquire slaves to sell to Europeans but Slaves were taken regularly by raiding tribes. The notion that slavery was a punishment is ridiculous. Slaves were made of opposing tribes virtually exclusively. The rements of this behavior still occur today in some parts of Africa.
 
The non-white people do. You're delusional. They know what they are doing, and they can barely hide their smiles about your stupidity. It's like the races are playing a game of soccer/football for power, and many of the brainwashed weak native Euro's want to pretend that there is no game and it's just a cute little thing whenever the other team scores..

America is a melting pot.. That was kind of the idea/experiment. Europe is the homeland (SMALL, homeland) of the people who made probably the worlds greatest civilizations. I don't feel as bad about immigration into America as Europe. European people truly deserve a home-land. Sure, white people created America and its rule of law, but it is not our ancestral homeland.

LOL, what a retarded thing to say, the only ones that care about race are Blacks and Americans, and not all blacks mostly those whose culture was erased via civilization.

The reason, is that these ethnic, religious and cultural identities are ancient, therefore they will drown the relatively new concept of race.

Its even more ridiculous when you talk about Syrian refugees, Syrians for the most part are white. The issue is not their race, the issue is their culture and religion imposing on the meek.
 
This is simply untrue. Slavery was huge in Africa, long before white people arrived. Its true that Coastal tribes began making raids inland in order to acquire slaves to sell to Europeans but Slaves were taken regularly by raiding tribes. The notion that slavery was a punishment is ridiculous. Slaves were made of opposing tribes virtually exclusively. The rements of this behavior still occur today in some parts of Africa.
Which is why I mentioned PoWs
True but initially slavery on the African continent was much rarer before the Europeans arrived. Slavery was used as a punishment for individuals who committed heinous crimes like muder or for PoWs. The huge increase in demand for slaves the Europeans caused lead the Africans to make slavery the punishment for increasingly lesser crimes and to incentivize tribes to go to war specifically for capturing slaves or to go on slaving raids.
The tribes weren't going to war with China, they were warring among themselves.
 
Woah, I don't know who would resort to eye-for-an-eye retribution in the form of disparaging minorities, but that's clearly not the answer.

I think we are on the same page, with the exception that I think that for the sake of consistency this guy should be held to the same level outrage and consequences as anyone would be if the races were reversed. It's a sad day when the media is openly racist.

media with integrity is gone, and yes, it is sad.
 
This is simply untrue. Slavery was huge in Africa, long before white people arrived. Its true that Coastal tribes began making raids inland in order to acquire slaves to sell to Europeans but Slaves were taken regularly by raiding tribes. The notion that slavery was a punishment is ridiculous. Slaves were made of opposing tribes virtually exclusively. The rements of this behavior still occur today in some parts of Africa.

African Slavery and Chattel Slavery aren't the same thing, one of the bigger misconceptions out there.
 
True, and not true. Europeans introduced the idea of Africans enslaving and selling other Africans, but only because Islamic Arabs (to the best of our knowledge) didn't present that option, since Arabs had a lower opinion of black Africans than Europeans did, and they stuck to raiding rather than trading.

Slavery was, by no means, rare before the arrival of Europeans and had existed on the continent for near a thousand years before the arrival of Europeans.
I said rarer, not necessarily rare. It was a fact of life that was around for a long time but the scale went up exponentially because of European demand. There wasn't nearly as much need for slave labor on the continent before the Europeans turned slaves into a valuable commodity.

I don't know if the Muslims had a better or worse idea of blacks. Black Eunuchs were some of the most powerful people within Islamic Empires. Obviously that system had its own barbaric twists like castration but those slaves had a very different place within society.
 
Certainly, there are brilliant women, but they are the exception.

Your talk about men running from marriage just proves my point. Studies show that a stable man who commits to his family often results in a happier wife and more successful children. The man's role in society is leader and stabilizer and males have been straying for that role and society is decaying because of it.
If you think that proves your point then there is no point in talking to you .
 
Modernity has definitely tended to replace gender roles, as the dominating defining mode of identity, with *material production* roles, as the dominating defining mode of identity. Gender roles are economically inefficient relative to the needs of the labor markets.

This isn't necessarily bad, since gender roles are often pointless and constraining for individuals, but it does tend to leave society vulnerable to increasing exploitation as a vehicle for capitalist profit generation. That increased exploitation, in turn, destabilizes national politics, breaking down the social compact into more extreme and divided factions. In some modern societies, particularly East Asia, the deconstruction of traditional gender identities is arguably tied to a fairly disastrous decline in reproductive success and family demographics. This, in turn, makes the economy shit, and importing a bunch of foreigners is not nearly so effective and cost-free of a solution, in empirical reality, as people like to claim.

Yeah, but the fact that it happens in Korea of all places, just shows that Atheist and those bitching about SJWs are just full of shit.

Its not because of SJWs that women decide to work, its because in modern society you are worth based on your work, no work and you are worthless.

So its not the left wing, its the trickle-down, bootstraps rightwing that drives down birthrates.
 
France's fertility rate of 1.9 says hello and fuck you.
 
France's fertility rate of 1.9 says hello and fuck you.
They do have the largest population of Muslim immigrants though, something like 10% IIRC. I do believe the native Frenchman still have higher birthrates than ethnic Germans and Dutch IIRC.
 
Yeah, but the fact that it happens in Korea of all places, just shows that Atheist and those bitching about SJWs are just full of shit.

Its not because of SJWs that women decide to work, its because in modern society you are worth based on your work, no work and you are worthless.

So its not the left wing, its the trickle-down, bootstraps rightwing that drives down birthrates.

SJWs are a modern product of past philosophical ideas. I'm not blaming them for the current state of things.
 
Back
Top