"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

By some yahoo you mean a columnist at a popular news source?

That means very little now days.

They will collect 5 yahoos tweeting something stupid and call it mass outrage or a mass protest. Its Fn stupid . Then Guys like Skip and Adawg get ahold of it and post some of the most silly things you can read. I swear some of you think were a day from the evil minorities rising up one night and slaughtering us in the night . All of you need to get a god damn grip.
 
I am not advocating that we go back to oppressing women. The larger problem is that males have given up their responsibility as men which has made for a society of neurotic women.

"There is little of man here; therefore their women strive to be mannish. For only he who is man enough will release the woman in woman." -Nietzsche

Oh, so you were being serious... that's dissapointing.

While I am no fan of how 3rd wave feminism has constructed a very divisive and antagonistic narrative, I genuinely believe that gender equality is a necessary pre-requisite for moving society forward. Don't let the vile opinions of a very vocal minority (social justice warriors) taint how you view an entire gender. The empowerment and integration of woman into roles traditionally assumed by men (the sciences, corporate roles etc) has been more beneficial than not.

If you don't mind me asking, what are the responsibilities of a man and woman? I personally can't think of any clear cut definitions.

A child (either girl or boy) should feel that they are capable of doing and being anything, but that they shouldn't expect any preferential treatment by virtue of what they have between their legs.
 
That means very little now days.

They will collect 5 yahoos tweeting something stupid and call it mass outrage or a mass protest. Its Fn stupid . Then Guys like Skip and Adawg get ahold of it and post some of the most silly things you can read. I swear some of you think were a day from the evil minorities rising up one night and slaughtering us in the night . All of you need to get a god damn grip.

There is a balance. What I will say is that in a vacuum, it looks like you're defending the racist editorial.

I don't care what some people on a forum have to say about the piece, as much as I care that they publish the piece. If you can't see that popular news sources should not be publishing this stuff, I don't know what to say.
 
Oh, so you were being serious... that's dissapointing.

While I am no fan of how 3rd wave feminism has constructed a very divisive and antagonistic narrative, I genuinely believe that gender equality is a necessary pre-requisite for moving society forward. Don't let the vile opinions of a very vocal minority (social justice warriors) taint how you view an entire gender. The empowerment and integration of woman into roles traditionally assumed by men (the sciences, corporate roles etc) has been more beneficial than not.

If you don't mind me asking, what are the responsibilities of a man and woman? I personally can't think of any clear cut definitions.

A child (either girl or boy) should feel that they are capable of doing and being anything, but that they shouldn't expect any preferential treatment by virtue of what they have between their legs.

I will just repost my previous response:

I am not advocating that we go back to oppressing women. The larger problem is that males have given up their responsibility as men which has made for a society of neurotic women and sissy males.

"There is little of man here; therefore their women strive to be mannish. For only he who is man enough will release the woman in woman." -Nietzsche
 
Has there ever been a civilization where people of all sexes, colors, and religions were guaranteed equal opportunity and have equal rights under the law? Other than the modern west, where else does something like that exist?
 
When I think of oppression in a political and racial context - Especially when comparing white rule vs black rule, I think of stripping people of their rights and not allowing equality under law. You're right but the context made me think of something else.

Yeah. Oppression doesn't have to be as obvious as legislation that says 'blacks aren't allowed to do A,B and C."
The current government just makes sure that those blacks are ostensibly free to do whatever they want in the eyes of the law, while denying them the ability to ever take advantage of those supposed opportunities. Essentially, the current government is maintaining the problem that the previous government realised had to be resolved: what do you do when 70% or so of your population is economically unproductive. The current government just doesn't seem to think it's a problem that needs to be resolved, because their pockets are full, so who cares?

That's why the wealth gap has been growing since the abolition of apartheid; the middle class (predominantly whites) have privatised everything (policing, healthcare, schooling, etc) while the poor blacks who weren't able to do the same, are now stuck depending on government welfare which keeps them alive enough to keep voting for it, but doesn't do enough to get them out of the trap.

South African legislation is oppressive to whites (the middle class), while South African reality is oppressive to blacks (the poor).
 
We expect better from everyone.

This is what I see as strange: The Guardian prints a racist piece. People criticize it. Others comment on the people who criticize it.

Fair enough on the first point.


Well, in regards to article I think we all agree that it is racist and wrong. But so are some of the criticisms.
 
There is a balance. What I will say is that in a vacuum, it looks like you're defending the racist editorial.

I don't care what some people on a forum have to say about the piece, as much as I care that they publish the piece. If you can't see that popular news sources should not be publishing this stuff, I don't know what to say.

In a way I am defending it but not the way you think. We live in a free country where anybody can say any idiot can say any retarded thing he or she wants at any given moment .... Its all in how you react to it . I ignore people I think are morons i dont really think Im under attack for being white and I dont support this misguided fools yelling about privilege either

Too me an idiot is an idiot regardless of which side of the spectrum they fall into and my mama always told me to consider the source ya know ?
 
The guy in the OP video is a fruitcake and his hyperbole about Trump being such a racist is ridiculous.
 
Not even going to watch it.

Look at the best countries in the world for quality of life and human rights, then look at the poorest.
 
I will just repost my previous response:

I am not advocating that we go back to oppressing women. The larger problem is that males have given up their responsibility as men which has made for a society of neurotic women and sissy males.

"There is little of man here; therefore their women strive to be mannish. For only he who is man enough will release the woman in woman." -Nietzsche

To which I respond, what is the responsibility of a man and a woman? Based on your previous response to another poster, I assume you subscribe to the traditional (Male = provider, and Female = Nurturer) archetype - which is fine.

Personally, I fundamentally disagree that this gender model is the ideal. In fact, I would argue that there is no ideal, and people should be free to pursue whatever arrangement is most suitable to their preferences and lifestyle choices. I have watched woman thrive in "non traditional" roles as scientists and corporate directors, as well as those who found happiness and fulfillment in being house wives and mothers (and in rare instances, I have seen woman achieve both)

Based purely on anecdotal observation, I notice that people who are either extremely pro or anti feminist tend hide behind these labels to rationalize their own shortcomings (I'm not accusing you of this). Why is it that uber feminists tend to be angry, unattractive woman and woman "haters" are neck beards and forever aloners?

Feminism hasn't made men sissies. That guy was always going to be a sissy - some people are just bitch made.
 
"Here in Ethiopia, we all know the country has a history of failing.. Failing itself, and failing its people. We are looking forward to the time when Asian and European immigrants and investors grow in such numbers that the Ethiopians are a minority, and a revolution of first world policies can truly have an impact. Then we will get somewhere. Until then, the failure and tradition of Ethiopians thinking they have a birthright to be in charge of Ethiopia will continue on as it always has.. So we suffer through this Ethiopian president, and the next, and wait for 2043 when needed change can finally happen."

Racist?
White man says this, what is white female news anchors reaction?
 
It's mind-boggling that some people think you can't be racist towards white people. Literally, by definition, you can. If someone discriminates against you based on your skin color they are being racist. Bottom line, end of story.

Right.

But It's also mind boggling that there are some that believe that foolish idea is gaining traction.
 
Feminism hasn't made men sissies. That guy was always going to be a sissy - some people are just bitch made.

Modernity has definitely tended to replace gender roles, as the dominating defining mode of identity, with *material production* roles, as the dominating defining mode of identity. Gender roles are economically inefficient relative to the needs of the labor markets.

This isn't necessarily bad, since gender roles are often pointless and constraining for individuals, but it does tend to leave society vulnerable to increasing exploitation as a vehicle for capitalist profit generation. That increased exploitation, in turn, destabilizes national politics, breaking down the social compact into more extreme and divided factions. In some modern societies, particularly East Asia, the deconstruction of traditional gender identities is arguably tied to a fairly disastrous decline in reproductive success and family demographics. This, in turn, makes the economy shit, and importing a bunch of foreigners is not nearly so effective and cost-free of a solution, in empirical reality, as people like to claim.
 
Right.

But It's also mind boggling that there are some that believe that foolish idea is gaining traction.

It's being taught in university classes as part of the cultural Marxist ideological package. The SJW phenomenon didn't come from nothing. It's being built deliberately.
 
In a way I am defending it but not the way you think. We live in a free country where anybody can say any idiot can say any retarded thing he or she wants at any given moment .... Its all in how you react to it . I ignore people I think are morons i dont really think Im under attack for being white and I dont support this misguided fools yelling about privilege either

Too me an idiot is an idiot regardless of which side of the spectrum they fall into and my mama always told me to consider the source ya know ?

People are tired of the double standard, is all. I don't care about racism that much. If you don't like a group of people, it really doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that racism is made to be this great evil, but it's not carried out evenly across the board.

Fair enough on the first point.


Well, in regards to article I think we all agree that it is racist and wrong. But so are some of the criticisms.

Sure, some of the critics are "wrong", but I hold the media as being more important than a few people on a forum.
 
How would you know if I've had an argument for you when you just got done saying you don't "stalk" your posts and move on to new ones?

Look, you are a waste of time. Either provide this example you keep yapping on about as it would apparently be some great victory for you.
Or
We will just go with the reality that this is basically saying you had sex with veronica vaughn...it never happened. But I am sure you can imagine what it would be like.

You are like some little boy who never met his dad and he desperately wants his dad's approval. Well, I am your dad in this case and you ain't getting my approval. Now, I hate empty posting and post whoring so I have to stop this conversation as it is a waste of my time. PS don't forget to send me a father's day card.

:P

toodles
 
People are tired of the double standard, is all. I don't care about racism that much. If you don't like a group of people, it really doesn't bother me. What bothers me is that racism is made to be this great evil, but it's not carried out evenly across the board.



Sure, some of the critics are "wrong", but I hold the media as being more important than a few people on a forum.

The media is basically Forum posters. These days they're online personalities, there's no journalism credentials anymore to become "the media".

It's just be loud and have the time and money.
 
The media is basically Forum posters. These days they're online personalities, there's no journalism credentials anymore to become "the media".

It's just be loud and have the time and money.

With the caveat that somebody hires them and they are qualified. A quick search shows that Thrasher has won the LGTB Journalist of the year award and has appeared in the New York Times. This is not just some guy. He's a reputable journalist publishing blatantly racist material, and he will go by unscathed. This is a double standard, and it's why people are rightfully perturbed.
 
Back
Top