Elections Republican Policies are So Unpopular they Need to Gerrymander Texas to Stay in Power

Of course he is. He even led a failed coup when he lost the last election and was expected to leave office. Then he pardoned cop killing maniacs once he got back in.

I wonder what the plan is to get him to leave office now? He has shown he isn’t going to leave willingly.
More debunked nonsense that you clung onto that helped kamalala lose in 2024. Why cling on to a failed playbook??
 
You weren’t “discussing” anything from the get go. You were just going unhinged blue haired insult mode and TDS 5th gear. At least you got that going for you.
I don’t follow that stuff and don’t care. I didn’t follow it or cares when democrats did it either.

Says the female that spews disgusting insults and refuses to adhere to the fact Trump got elected due to his policies.

Look, I tried to have a conversation with you but you admitted to not paying attention. Why do you even post in the WR if you don't follow the details? You like Trump without even knowing what he is doing. That my friends is TDS. Drink deeply.
 
<JagsKiddingMe>

Who are the "cop killing maniacs" he pardoned? And do you have any footage of them having to drag him out of the white house, since according to you, "he's shown he isn't going to leave willingly"?
You’re right, the woman with a cracked skull survived. Her attackers were pardoned. Same goes with the cop stabbed, the cop who broke his back.

All their attackers were pardoned. By the president.
 
You’re right, the woman with a cracked skull survived. Her attackers were pardoned. Same goes with the cop stabbed, the cop who broke his back.

All their attackers were pardoned. By the president.
Ok, so you were lying, there were no "cop killing maniacs", and the only person who murdered anybody was the reckless cop who already left loaded guns lying around whenever he took a shit, who popped out of a closet to shoot an unarmed girl in the throat, and was never charged in the first place? Great, thanks.
 
Ok, so you were lying, there were no "cop killing maniacs", and the only person who murdered anybody was the reckless cop who already left loaded guns lying around whenever he took a shit, who popped out of a closet to shoot an unarmed girl in the throat, and was never charged in the first place? Great, thanks.

I'll remind you of this dumb post next time someone gets shot on someone else's property and you're balls deep defending it as the right course of action.

Remember Ralph Yarl and how you were wetting your panties about them victimizing the poor shooter who felt threatened? Remember also how you mocked "the left" collectively for buying into the idea shooting someone to death might be a crime when clearly the old man felt threatened?

Ralph Yarl was also unarmed, and wasn't trying to break in to the property backed by a baying mob, either, funny how you interpret the two stories so radically differently.
 
I'll remind you of this dumb post next time someone gets shot on someone else's property and you're balls deep defending it as the right course of action.

Remember Ralph Yarl and how you were wetting your panties about them victimizing the poor shooter who felt threatened? Remember also how you mocked "the left" collectively for buying into the idea shooting someone to death might be a crime when clearly the old man felt threatened?

Ralph Yarl was also unarmed, and wasn't trying to break in to the property backed by a baying mob, either, funny how you interpret the two stories so radically differently.
No, I don't remember a lot of things you made up. Ralph Yarl isn't dead, stupid, and the 80 year old who shot him was charged, convicted, and is dead.

Lol at "but but Ralph Yarl"

<36>
 
No, I don't remember a lot of things you made up. Ralph Yarl isn't dead, stupid, and the 80 year old who shot him was charged, convicted, and is dead.

Lol at "but but Ralph Yarl"

<36>

"But he's not dead" - and?

Your characterization of this particular story after you've been dog whistled by the usual morons is "HE JUMPED OUT OF A CLOSET AND SHOT AN UNARMED LADY", when that's far closer to what happened in the Ralph Yarl case - which you defended vociferously because....

... well, because you'd been dog whistled by the usual morons.

Again.

You don't care about people getting shot, you just care about the precious narrative lmao

Like you say, Ralph Yarl's shooter was charged and convicted because he was wrong. Unlike the police officer in Jan 6.

I think you just like to be a Contrary Mary and argue for the sake of it because consistently picking the wrong side is otherwise inexcusably dumb!
 
"But he's not dead" - and?

Your characterization of this particular story after you've been dog whistled by the usual morons is "HE JUMPED OUT OF A CLOSET AND SHOT AN UNARMED LADY", when that's far closer to what happened in the Ralph Yarl case - which you defended vociferously because....

... well, because you'd been dog whistled by the usual morons.

Again.

You don't care about people getting shot, you just care about the precious narrative lmao

Like you say, Ralph Yarl's shooter was charged and convicted because he was wrong. Unlike the police officer in Jan 6.

I think you just like to be a Contrary Mary and argue for the sake of it because consistently picking the wrong side is otherwise inexcusably dumb!
Oof, that's some sad projection.

Yes, everything is a "dog whistle" that only you can hear.

So according to you, it would have been perfectly acceptable for cops to start blasting away at unarmed BLM protesters they had no contact with, if they were trespassing?

No you don't think that, because you're a partisan hack who only decides whether it's acceptable to shoot somebody after you've found out their race and political affiliation.

There is literally 0 other reason for you to "but Ralph Yarl" when it just proves what a hack you are. Why exactly is it ok to shoot a 5'2 unarmed girl in the throat for trespassing in a public building and actually kill her, but not for an 80 year old man in his home? One was actually seeking out an unarmed trespasser to shoot, the other was asleep in his home with someone banging on his door at night, but because you don't like the political affiliation of the little girl, it's ok to shoot her because you're just a POS.
 
Oof, that's some sad projection.

Yes, everything is a "dog whistle" that only you can hear.

So according to you, it would have been perfectly acceptable for cops to start blasting away at unarmed BLM protesters they had no contact with, if they were trespassing?

No you don't think that, because you're a partisan hack who only decides whether it's acceptable to shoot somebody after you've found out their race and political affiliation.

There is literally 0 other reason for you to "but Ralph Yarl" when it just proves what a hack you are. Why exactly is it ok to shoot a 5'2 unarmed girl in the throat for trespassing in a public building and actually kill her, but not for an 80 year old man in his home? One was actually seeking out an unarmed trespasser to shoot, the other was asleep in his home with someone banging on his door at night, but because you don't like the political affiliation of the little girl, it's ok to shoot her because you're just a POS.

Hahaha, where's the gorilla face, don't think I've seen anyone this gotten to in a long time!

And all I did was hold up the mirror, ya gimp.
 
Hahaha, where's the gorilla face, don't think I've seen anyone this gotten to in a long time!

And all I did was hold up the mirror, ya gimp.
Concession accepted with that sad attempt to save face. All it took was mentioning the cop shooting an unarmed girl for you to spaz out with "but but Ralph Yarl". Pathetic



{<jordan}
 
Look, I tried to have a conversation with you but you admitted to not paying attention. Why do you even post in the WR if you don't follow the details? You like Trump without even knowing what he is doing. That my friends is TDS. Drink deeply.
Take a hard look at post 156 and then…. Yourself in the mirror…. That’s who you are from the jump and the delusional unhinged lady you’ll always be.
 
It’s just pretentious attitude and opinionated claims that helped you and kamalala lose in November. If you haven’t figured that out yet than don’t complain about future losses.
Oh cute, you spelled her name wrong. Such a stud.


Was it really my "attitude" that drove you into Trump's arms? You voted with the KKK, voted for a felon/rapist because of my attitude?

Man you are weak AF.
 
Oh cute, you spelled her name wrong. Such a stud.
Tough shit

And again… ignore it all you want but post 156 is who you are from the START.

Was it really my "attitude" that drove you into Trump's arms?
Even quite a few lefty political analysts have admitted that the nastiness of the left was enough to make the middle voters turn on them. Blame yourselves.


You voted with the KKK,
For the 3rd time… Typing it on a keyboard doesn’t make it true no matter how much you don’t understand this. Even Bill Maher said many times that false claims of “wah wah waycis” was ridiculous and a failed card since 2016. So again…. You only have yourself to blame.

voted for a felon/rapist
The video or REAL proof of this you have on your hard drive… post it. Until then it’s BS and counterproductive.


because of my attitude?
Forget about me….. once I saw riots, property damage, and assaults on people that “looked like they voted for Trump” after the 2016 election was enough for me. People like you have been pushing middle voters away with a shitty attitude of a faceless anonymous female shit poster since 2016. Again… you girls only have yourselves to blame.

Man you are weak AF.
The inaccurate opinion of some faceless anonymous female keyboarder hiding behind anonymity means very little to me or anyone.
 
Back
Top