i actually disagree about the quality of opposition.
he won hist first belt in his 6th fight, from a two division champion in hernandez, who had had like 30 fights going in.
he moved up 2 divisions to destroy narvaez, who had made some ridiculous 25 defenses of his belt and whose only loss was to a prime donaire. narvaez got wrecked.
he moved up again to beat the shit out of another champion in mcdonnell, who was considered a top fighter at bantamweight. he whooped him in what, a minute? just walked in there and hit him a hundred times until jamie went down.
those may not be household names, but they were legit champions, and they were blown out of the water completely. it's one thing to win championships in different weight classes, it's another thing entirely to move through them and annihilate a top guy in every division you step into. he wasn't winning those belts from people who just stumbled into the championships, they were legit champs. the fact that inoue had a competitive fight with another 4 division champion isn't something we should be using to discredit him... not to mention he actually dropped nonito, was blocked by the ref from swarming on him, and donaire still barely beat the count.
he's a three division champ, he's won the WBSS tournament, has only had 19 fights and is 26 years old. that's an incredible career already, no matter how you slice it.
and anyone who is now saying they weren't hyped about inoue before is a fucking liar. people were either in awe of his power and ability, they hadn't seen him fight, or they truly didn't know shit about boxing. no one watches a kid blast his way through champions and goes "well, he's nothing special, he'll be exposed soon". it's just revisionist assholes trying to stir up shit now.