- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 18,418
- Reaction score
- 34,915
I disagree. I Yair had landed the KO elbow on KZ after the bell instead of 1 second before the bell should he still win?
That ref never saw a need to stop the fight until the bell sounded. Unless he says he was stopping the fight and didn't do so because of the bell he is wrong. Answering the bell is for starting the action. The final bell leaves nothing to answer but the decision. The guy wasn't out. Final bell means he has no need to defend himself. He might have been catching his breath as he was exhausted fighting off a choke for 50 seconds. The same choke the ref saw no need to stop during the fight.
Your Yair example is being KO’d after the bell which is illegal. Technically in that instance, the ref waved that fight off after the bell too. Same thing here, guy was out when the bell rang and it became obvious after.
It’s more like if a guy landed a big punch right at the bell and the other dude couldn’t get back up. When the bell sounded, the ref may not have realized he was out, but it became clear he was and thus couldn’t answer the bell. Answering the bell doesn’t mean only start of rounds. If that’s the case why do they wave off fights when a round ends if a fighter is clearly unconscious? By your logic, the ref did not see a reason to stop it before the bell so therefore they cannot stop it. The rules make no distinction between the end of round 1 or round 3. If the guy is out when the bell rings, he’s done.
Last edited: