- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
- Messages
- 2,703
- Reaction score
- 0
Stupid wall n stall!
You remember that shit? People were always making threads here about the horrible travesty of how the unified rules are biased toward wrestlers and all different ideas for rule changes they should make to create a more even playing field for striking. Then what happened? A few years later the fighters have evolved, and it's not a common thing anymore. All the best fighters have found ways of getting it back to the feet and controlling where the fight goes. Nobody in the upper echelon of MMA competition is content to keep their opponent in guard and throw up hail mary triangles for fifteen minutes anymore; a whole array of techniques have been integrated into every competent bottom game for getting the fight back to the feet when fighters can't sweep or submit, and that game is still evolving. Haters can hate, but MMA is still awesome and it's so cool to watch the sport evolve.
Take a guy down once for a few seconds in an otherwise even round and win the round 10-9.
If the standup was even, why wouldn't slightly more effective grappling win the round?
You are interpreting the rules.
I am criticizing them.
A 'surprise' TD is not effective grappling. Especially if you don't keep the guy down or you take him down with 10 seconds left.
Fitch, Shields and Davis were cut. GSP retired. Sonnen quit. Maynard fell in love with his striking.
Exactly. Also, judges have been less apt to reward it than they were in the past. I think any evolution beyond LnP had more to do with incentives being changed rather than with fighters becoming more skilled.