Reddit's New Content Policy: Hate Towards "Majority" Groups Permissable

[sangreporsangre]

I think these social media platforms will be used increasingly to make threats of rape and murder towards women who won't submit to trans extremists. I mean they already are of course, but it will intensify in the coming months as it is tacitly endorsed by these tech giants. Reddit has made it official and now codified it into their TOS. And just look at Twitter, where you can be banned for saying that men can never be women yet they allow stuff like this:



An incel freak can make threats like that that without any fear of being banned because he knows that the dehumanization of and violent rhetoric against "TERFs" is not just condoned on these platforms, it is encouraged.

 

[MusterX]

nice misquote
all the sad members of "the donald" have other websites to go to like those aforementioned
but nice try
4/10

50,000,000 people voted for Trump. The fact that you characterize a group of 50 million people as "stormfront" racists is what is sad. I can't even tell if you are serious or just trolling for a reaction.

 

[uppercutbus]

An incel freak can make threats like that that without any fear of being banned because he knows that the dehumanization of and violent rhetoric against "TERFs" is not just condoned on these platforms, it is encouraged.

They also banned TERFs them from Reddit, basically open season on them. Selective enforcement of rules against groups they deemed problematic.

 

[ShinkanPo]

So we could all talk shot on the Chinese or Indians on reddit now?


I forget with country has more people

China and reddot is filled with pro Comunist Chinese.

 

[MusterX]

I mean, they could've just done this without explicitly telling people. What the fuck were they thinking? They're getting smashed for their new TOS, and are gonna lose a lot of members over it.

They jumped the shark.

The only members they will lose are offended conservatives, leaving them with an even stronger liberal stronghold. What makes you think they don't know this and actually planned it that way?

 

[Officer Rick]

50,000,000 people voted for Trump. The fact that you characterize a group of 50 million people as "stormfront" racists is what is sad. I can't even tell if you are serious or just trolling for a reaction.

Are you autistic? Because making that conclusion makes you seem like you have autism

 

[Bob Sapp]

This is what they tayght in my college class. It was a cultural communication class. The professor always said its ok to hate white people because theyre the majority.

 

[ineverpost]

What's insane is that they allow gang bangers to setup boards

 

[uppercutbus]

They changed the text:
https://www.reddithelp.com/en/categ...restrictions/promoting-hate-based-identity-or

old:

While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect all groups or all forms of identity. For example, the rule does not protect groups of people who are in the majority or who promote such attacks of hate.

new:

While the rule on hate protects such groups, it does not protect those who promote attacks of hate or who try to hide their hate in bad faith claims of discrimination.

I guess they can still do some SJW mental gymnastics to say you can't be racist towards white people.

And it still allows open season under their vague conditions. Someone makes an argument, but it's in "bad-faith" so they can receive some call to violence against them and they will "not be protected". Probably encouraged and celebrated like the good little Marxists they are. Given reddit gold and shit.

One of their examples:

Post describing a racial minority as sub-human and inferior to the racial majority.

^ This one is strange. Needing to describe who is receiving and who is outputting sounds like it's important. A 1-way street where the minority can "punch-up" with the same speech and it's ok. Wouldn't anyone, whoever they are, receiving that type of speech be protected? If so it wouldn't need the qualifiers.

 

[Lovestorm]

They changed the text:
https://www.reddithelp.com/en/categ...restrictions/promoting-hate-based-identity-or

old:


new:


I guess they can still do some SJW mental gymnastics to say you can't be racist towards white people.

And it still allows open season under their vague conditions. Someone makes an argument, but it's in "bad-faith" so they can receive some call to violence against them and they will "not be protected". Probably encouraged and celebrated like the good little Marxists they are. Given reddit gold and shit.

One of their examples:



^ This one is strange. Needing to describe who is receiving and who is outputting sounds like it's important. A 1-way street where the minority can "punch-up" with the same speech and it's ok. Wouldn't anyone, whoever they are, receiving that type of speech be protected? If so it wouldn't need the qualifiers.

Too late.

Perhaps they never intended to make their agenda so obvious or they were bold enough to make it that blatant but did not expect a backlash. Ultimately, the internet never forgets.