Movies Rate: Tombstone (1993) New Review

[GoodBadHBK]

They didn’t exist in 1974.




Chances of it being bad are higher than not liking something with 5 stars.

You see? Same with films. Batman And Robin is universally considered a joke, meanwhile you have a good chance to be entertained with Taken or Deja Vu or other good action flicks.

Well the Godfather was 1972 but ok we can say 1974. You're probably right anyway.

 

[BisexualMMA]

The movie itself (which I love) was a bit heavy handed overall, the scene where Curly Bill shoots the Sheriff he's cartoonishly stumbling down the street firing at the boom camera and staring into the lens. It's not typical academy material. It's a popcorn flick.

The thing is that In the Line of Fire and The Fugitive were both not typical Academy material either. It really was a year that they let their hair down a bit and went with some more mainstream non artsy fartsy type of stuff.

 

[revoltub]

They didn’t exist in 1974.




Chances of it being bad are higher than not liking something with 5 stars.

You see? Same with films. Batman And Robin is universally considered a joke, meanwhile you have a good chance to be entertained with Taken or Deja Vu or other good action flicks.

A lot of times restaurants can be good or bad depending on whose cooking that day.

 

[GoodBadHBK]

They didn’t exist in 1974.




Chances of it being bad are higher than not liking something with 5 stars.

You see? Same with films. Batman And Robin is universally considered a joke, meanwhile you have a good chance to be entertained with Taken or Deja Vu or other good action flicks.

Batman & Robin is easily the best batman movie. Sucks to be you that you didn't get that out of it.

Clooney and Arnold in the same movie?

 

[I Fusion I]

Batman & Robin is easily the best batman movie. Sucks to be you that you didn't get that out of it.

Clooney and Arnold in the same movie?

ok man.

Well the Godfather was 1972 but ok we can say 1974. You're probably right anyway.

My bad. Made a mistake, anyway the video is clearly a joke and you are joking.

Also, you know Godfather 1 and 2 are in my top 5, lol
Also, you know Godfather 1 and 2 are in my top 5, lol

 

[revoltub]

Pretty generous, I'd give it a 4 at best. Too many flaws and plot holes for me. We should team up like Billy and Jesse James to create a YouTube channel.

We can do like the critical drinker but go at acclaimed beloved films instead of woke ones.

Rocky? Sucks.
Godfather? Sucks.
Good the bad and the ugly? Dont get me started.

 

[I Fusion I]

A lot of times restaurants can be good or bad depending on whose cooking that day.

This is false

 

[GoodBadHBK]

My bad. Made a mistake, anyway the video is clearly a joke and you are joking.

Also, you know Godfather 1 and 2 are in my top 5, lol

I don't know that. You have refuted any points I've made about how overrated and boring it is. James Caan isn't even Italian.

So I guess Vito pulled 2 kids off the straight and brought them into his family, because Sonny and Tom look like brothers while the entire family looks nothing like them.

 

[revoltub]

This is false

Idk how. Different cooks make things differently.

 

[GoodBadHBK]

This is false

Most certainly not. Not all cooks cook the same.

 

[revoltub]

I don't know that. You have refuted any points I've made about how overrated and boring it is. James Caan isn't even Italian.

So I guess Vito pulled 2 kids off the straight and brought them into his family, because Sonny and Tom look like brothers while the entire family looks nothing like them.

Hell Brando isnt italian either. Total appropriation here.

 

[GoodBadHBK]

We can do like the critical drinker but go at acclaimed beloved films instead of woke ones.

Rocky? Sucks.
Godfather? Sucks.
Good the bad and the ugly? Dont get me started.

I mean I agree with the first 2 but not the 3rd one. But maybe you can convince me otherwise?

 

[GoodBadHBK]

Hell Brando isnt italian either. Total appropriation here.

I wish we were woke back then. Wouldn't be in this mess now.

 

[revoltub]

I mean I agree with the first 2 but not the 3rd one. But maybe you can convince me otherwise?

The dubbing was atrocious. Sounds like a bad kung fu movie. Also definitely can't shoot a rope in half like that. Makes no sense. If it wasn't for the score nobody would talk about it.

 

[I Fusion I]

Idk how. Different cooks make things differently.

Obviously nobody is the absolute truth, critics run into mistakes but reading the reviews of critics like Roger Ebert which are erecognized as the best film critics ever, it remains the best possible evaluation to define a film.


I tend to give greater relevance and reliability to the former either by competence or by the tools at their disposal or because they do it for work.

That does not mean I agree with them every single time, but most of the time their opinion is correct. Hope you understand what I mean.

Also, what matters is how much you like the film, not what other people say or argue, remember. I haven’t changed my opinion on rises or lord of the rings either.

 

[revoltub]

Obviously nobody is the absolute truth, critics run into mistakes but reading the reviews of critics like Roger Ebert which are erecognized as the best film critics ever, it remains the best possible evaluation to define a film.


I tend to give greater relevance and reliability to the former either by competence or by the tools at their disposal or because they do it for work.

That does not mean I agree with them every single time, but most of the time their opinion is correct. Hope you understand what I mean.

Also, what matters is how much you like the film, not what other people say or argue, remember. I haven’t changed my opinion on rises or lord of the rings either.

I actually dont understand what you mean.

 

[I Fusion I]

I actually dont understand what you mean.

I don’t think critics = proof but I think critics, producers and directors are reliable most of the time because of analysis, criticism, years of working within the field and competence.

I mean, all the various awards and praise for someone’s work is justified? Like Ebert won the pulitzer so of course he is more reliable than any YouTuber.

I said at the end that everyone has their preferences and opinions, so stick to that and don’t get mad when someone disagrees with you.

 

[revoltub]

I don’t think critics = proof but I think critics, producers and directors are reliable most of the time because of analysis, criticism, years of working within the field and competence.

I mean, all the various awards and praise for someone’s work is justified? Like Ebert won the pulitzer so of course he is more reliable than any YouTuber.

I see what you mean but I think critics are becoming less reliable over the years.

 

[GoodBadHBK]

The dubbing was atrocious. Sounds like a bad kung fu movie. Also definitely can't shoot a rope in half like that. Makes no sense. If it wasn't for the score nobody would talk about it.

Aw man that hurts but you're right. Wow I wish I didn't ask this but at the same time I'm kind of glad I did.

Now that you mention it how does Clint have better aim than snipers? And it was about 2 hours too long.

 

[I Fusion I]

I see what you mean but I think critics are becoming less reliable over the years.

For you. I think the general consensus mostly shows if a movie was mixed, polarizing, trashed or praised.

You watch it and try to form your thoughts based on what it gives on a filmmaking and emotional basis, at the end.

I don’t like lord of the rings but they are great films.

If you have an issue with your car, do you go to the mechanic or you watch a YouTube video or ask in a site how to repair it? That’s the difference between critics and non-critics