Movies Rate: Tombstone (1993) New Review

[I Fusion I]

I doubt this is what you truly believe. I don't need a YouTube video to tell me how Godfather is boring.

?? The video is just a tribute in case he hasn’t seen the films.

I would invite you to go read quotes from authors and filmmakers who talk about some of the BS claims some critics have made and analyzed about their work.

That doesn’t mean anything.

 

[revoltub]

Further showing how pretentious and terrible Coppola is. Just like when Sonny gets shot 200 times but doesn't fall down right away. Just another example of Caan being a can.

Not to mention the actual casting choice of him as sonny. Michael, Fredo and Connie you can believe are siblings. Caan looks about as italian as jackie chan. Definitely not believable as a Corleone

 

[revoltub]

?? The video is just a tribute in case he hasn’t seen the films.



That doesn’t mean anything.

Doesnt mean anything because the critic knows more than the creators or because criticism is subjective?

 

[I Fusion I]

Doesnt mean anything because the critic knows more than the creators or because criticism is subjective?

That would be an opinion, not a fact.

 

[revoltub]

That would be an opinion, not a fact.

I was asking you

 

[GoodBadHBK]

Not to mention the actual casting choice of him as sonny. Michael, Fredo and Connie you can believe are siblings. Caan looks about as italian as jackie chan. Definitely not believable as a Corleone

Jackie Chan definitely would've made the punch believable though.

 

[revoltub]

Jackie Chan definitely would've made the punch believable though.

Absolutely. True stunt work is another lacking element of the film.

 

[I Fusion I]

I was asking you

in reality all the cinema experts and sites confirm various opinions so... ,

 

[revoltub]

in reality all the cinema experts and sites confirm various opinions so... ,

But didnt you say in your one thread that consensus means nothing?

 

[GoodBadHBK]

Absolutely. True stunt work is another lacking element of the film.

Hold onto the rail, I'll just bite your hand because I'm suppose to be a tough gangster and that's what we do.

Pfffft. I can't believe I actually liked that film at 1 time.

And if @Aronized thinks I'm wrong then here's exhibit A

 

[revoltub]

Hold onto the rail, I'll just bite your hand because I'm suppose to be a tough gangster and that's what we do.

Pfffft. I can't believe I actually liked that film at 1 time.

And if @Aronized thinks I'm wrong then here's exhibit A

Yeah it went from a 10 to like a 5 for me after our discussion

 

[I Fusion I]

Hold onto the rail, I'll just bite your hand because I'm suppose to be a tough gangster and that's what we do.

Pfffft. I can't believe I actually liked that film at 1 time.

And if @Aronized thinks I'm wrong then here's exhibit A

the guy is trolling. He mentioned post Malone and imagine dragons..

But didnt you say in your one thread that consensus means nothing?

It depends on what we are talking about. I think the majority and consensus is useful, sometime it proves something, sometime it’s opinion based.

 

[HUGHPHUG]

Oh man, Slumdog Millionaire is going mental up in here

 

[revoltub]

the guy is trolling. He mentioned post Malone and imagine dragons..



It depends on what we are talking about. I think the majority and consensus is useful, sometime it proves something, sometime it’s opinion based.

Seems the difference is just what you want to personally make of it

 

[I Fusion I]

Seems the difference is just what you want to personally make of it

It depends on the subject. If the majority says a restaurant sucks and it has 1 star out of 5, would you go there?

Difference is; if a film is good or great that’s an opinion. (Most of the time).

 

[GoodBadHBK]

the guy is trolling. He mentioned post Malone and imagine dragons..



It depends on what we are talking about. I think the majority and consensus is useful, sometime it proves something, sometime it’s opinion based.

Great rapper and band, what's the issue?

 

[revoltub]

It depends on the subject. If the majority says a restaurant sucks and it has 1 star out of 5, would you go there?

Difference is; if a film is good or great that’s an opinion. (Most of the time).

I'd try the food anyway

 

[jx820]

so these were the people nominated the year he would have been...

WINNER
TOMMY LEE JONES
The Fugitive
NOMINEES
LEONARDO DICAPRIO
What's Eating Gilbert Grape
RALPH FIENNES
Schindler's List
JOHN MALKOVICH
In the Line of Fire
PETE POSTLETHWAITE
In the Name of the Father


I haven't seen any of these movies other than the Fugitive. But I still feel confident that he should have been nominated over at least some of them. Tough to say that he should have won over Tommy Lee Jones though.

That is a murderers row. I'd put him above some of it, but that's a stacked category.

My guess would be that he was overlooked because he REALLY chewed the set. It was great, but it wasn't exactly a subtle nuanced performance.

The movie itself (which I love) was a bit heavy handed overall, the scene where Curly Bill shoots the Sheriff he's cartoonishly stumbling down the street firing at the boom camera and staring into the lens. It's not typical academy material. It's a popcorn flick.

 

[I Fusion I]

Great rapper and band, what's the issue?

They didn’t exist in 1974.

I'd try the food anyway

Chances of it being bad are higher than not liking something with 5 stars.

You see? Same with films. Batman And Robin is universally considered a joke, meanwhile you have a good chance to be entertained with Taken or Deja Vu or other good action flicks.

 

[GoodBadHBK]

Yeah it went from a 10 to like a 5 for me after our discussion

Pretty generous, I'd give it a 4 at best. Too many flaws and plot holes for me. We should team up like Billy and Jesse James to create a YouTube channel.