Quentin Tarantino vs Christopher Nolan

Tarantino for dialogue and fight scenes, Nolan for story telling and imagery
 
Very different styles and I enjoy both immensely but...

Tarantino all day any day of the fucking week.
 
Very different guys. But personally qt is in a different league imo.

I usually enjoy Nolan but one big difference between the you imo is that qt films seem to keep getting better where as Nolan films tend to be amazing initially but don't hold up as well after multiple viewing.
 
Very different guys. But personally qt is in a different league imo.

I usually enjoy Nolan but one big difference between the you imo is that qt films seem to keep getting better where as Nolan films tend to be amazing initially but don't hold up as well after multiple viewing.

This would be my answer.

Tarantino movies just have that replay factor. You can watch them over and over, and even when you know every line, they're still entertaining.

I think Nolan might make better films [in my opinion], but QT's are much more entertaining.
 
Im leaning toward Nolan, though I'm looking forward to him making more movies without Batman or Decrapio.
 
wat

Tarantino by KO a minute into the first round

edit: and I like Nolan quite a bit, but come on
 
Fincher vs Nolan would have been more competitive.
 
I like almost every movie that either one has directed. To me it's really close but Pulp Fiction is my favorite movie, so I give the edge to Tarantino.
 
I've liked some Nolan films for sure, but Tarantino is on another level.
 
In before some uneducated dumbfu*k says, "QT is over rated and steals shit from other directors."

Go watch Transformers....
 
Back
Top