Elections Project 2025 major right wing groups plan on creating a new super super pack

[44nutman]

Make America Germany Again.

 

[Sinister]

Lmao you're such a bad arguer.

Not as bad as being an "arguer" who says that prosecuting a criminal who has admitted to crimes, who blatantly wanted to illegally retain power, is a "travesty of justice." Lol

Make America Germany Again.

This is the exact kind of language and sentiment that was being pushed in Germany after the Treaty of Versaille came to be.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

Not as bad as being an "arguer" who says that prosecuting a criminal who has admitted to crimes, who blatantly wanted to illegally retain power, is a "travesty of justice." Lol

It is if you only do it one guy when there are dozens of other guys who deserve prosecution and you protect them.

 

[Spounman]

LOL. Where do you people come up with this shit?

One of their mentally ill personalities kicks in

Drain the swamp!

 

[emefer]

Right.

I’m glad you agree that I am right in saying you are wrong.
Maybe you're starting to come around.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

I’m glad you agree that I am right in saying you are wrong.
Maybe you're starting to come around.

<[analyzed}>

 

[Hdfi]

If they keep autogynephilic transgender predators in line I'm ok with that.

 

[Sinister]

It is if you only do it one guy when there are dozens of other guys who deserve prosecution and you protect them.

I dont protect anyone. If there's evidence of crimes, prosecute away. I will say if "evidence" is nonsensical bullsh*t or not based on available information.

You are just engaging in partisan hackery and serial whataboutism. This thread demonstrates that you side with blatant fascists and you'll do anything to avoid discussing that.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

I dont protect anyone. If there's evidence of crimes, prosecute away. I will say if "evidence" is nonsensical bullsh*t or not based on available information.

You are just engaging in partisan hackery and serial whataboutism. This thread demonstrates that you side with blatant fascists and you'll do anything to avoid discussing that.

As I've pointed out. Obama drone stuck a US citizen. Public record.

 

[RoastBeast]

That was a pretty nice mental backflip.

They specifically used the "T" aspect of LGBTQ as their example, and you think people are exaggerating that they intend to target LGBTQ people. And they specifically indicated teachers and librarians, who have been a central target of anti-LGBTQ sentiment perpetuated by the religious right. And here you are with the "well I think you're reading too much into it."

Never mind the implication for straight people. That's honestly just as absurd, the idea that the entirety of "pornography" will be censored, and the basic assumption that the decision of what constituted "pornography" will be reasonable to the majority of people living under this sort of rule when the document quite clearly indicates that they intend to override State functions, this is not Governing, this is ruling. And we're not going to merely argue about whether or not theyll actually jail gay people to gloss over that.

If you support this blatant fascism, that's your prerogative. But at least be honest about it, because the more you attempt to reason it the worse it looks.

I didn't say I supported it. I'm just reading it verbatim. You're the one doing mental backflips here.

They're talking about prosecuting people involved in pornography and you're pretending that they're targeting LGBTQ while giving straight people a pass. There is nothing in that paragraph that you showed me that says they are targeting LGBTQ. It reads as if they're targeting the pornography industry as a whole. There's nothing in there that says they're only targeting LGBTQ people involved in the porn industry.

This is just an exaggeration and fabrication on your part.

I don't agree with what they want to do either but you're off the deep end with your little fantasy here.

 

[HunterAcosta]

Nah. There are PLENTY of Republicans in the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA. In fact there's an old saying in that community that ONLY Republicans are ever allowed to investigate anything and this is because Democrats have always been so terrified of accusations of partisanship that they almost always appoint Republicans to these positions...while the Republicans always appoint Republicans because of...blatant partisanship and retention of power.

Sooner or later you're going to have to face the fact that your guy just sucks that bad where even Republican investigators found his behavior indefensible. Reputable lawyers fled from him. And this Heritage Foundation Autocracy Manifesto is all the proof you need that the Donor class understand that if re-elected, he will be such a sh*tty President for everyone but them that they will HAVE to make him a dictator, and any other Republican who gets into office as well. This is them straight up admitting that installation of fascism is the only way they can keep up their scam of funneling tax dollars to themselves, and they sincerely hope that people like you will be supportive the moment you hear "deep state"..."anti-choice"..."illegal LGBTQ"..."protect the kids"..."pro life"...and all your other trigger words.

Lol x 100000 any repub that thinks that law enforcement whether it’s local , state or federal ( fbi, cia , DOJ ) is full of hippy , liberal types is smoking pcp . It’s OVERWHELMINGLY right leaning , same with military and firefighters .

 

[Sinister]

I didn't say I supported it. I'm just reading it verbatim. You're the one doing mental backflips here.

They're talking about prosecuting people involved in pornography and you're pretending that they're targeting LGBTQ while giving straight people a pass. There is nothing in that paragraph that you showed me that says they are targeting LGBTQ. It reads as if they're targeting the pornography industry as a whole. There's nothing in there that says they're only targeting LGBTQ people involved in the porn industry.

This is just an exaggeration and fabrication on your part.

I don't agree with what they want to do either but you're off the deep end with your little fantasy here.

Yet another backflip. No one even came close to stating that they're giving straight people a pass. They're emphasizing LGBTQ people by their own language, the main example they cited was LGBTQ, and the second quote mentioned sexuality as one of the protections from prosecution they specifically don't want. Race was another one but this thread isnt even about that.

It does not read that they are targeting "the porn industry" alone, if it did there would be no need to mention teachers and librarians. They are mentioned because they are at the center of the idea that they're turning kids gay and trans, and not only are you aware of that, you arent contesting it. This is calling for them to become registered sex offenders, which is asinine and absurd. There would be no need to threaten District Attorneys.

There's no fantasy, theres just people like you either ignoring reality, or not being honest about your enthusiasm, or at the very least tolerance for what these people want.

 

[Sinister]

As I've pointed out. Obama drone stuck a US citizen. Public record.

Never once did I say there should be no accountability for that.

 

[Sinister]

Lol x 100000 any repub that thinks that law enforcement whether it’s local , state or federal ( fbi, cia , DOJ ) is full of hippy , liberal types is smoking pcp . It’s OVERWHELMINGLY right leaning , same with military and firefighters .

I once had a guy tell me that minorities are perpetually mad about being policed entirely by the only demographic qualified to do so.

Took me a moment to even figure out how to begin to address the blatant racism of that statement, nevernind the lack of understanding of how policing should work so it can build public confidence.

That said all anyone needs to ever do is watch the House Oversight Committee hearings right now. The ones run by Republicans are so much of a sh*t-show it's comical. Whereas people like Raskin, AOC, Katie Porter, and Whitehouse turn donor class mofos to Kool-Aid in their chairs

 

[SurferH2O]

Who's 'my guy?' RFK Jr?

You don't have to be a Trump supporter to see that what is happening to him is a travesty of justice. The fact you think someone's opinion on that must fall along partisan lines just reveals that you don't believe in justice and are 100% OK with corruption as long as it's on your side.

^^^^ This. I think they call anyone that opposes them a Trump supporter, as they can't see shades of gray.

Many Independents, Conservatives, Libertarians, and Republicans don't want to see Trump in the White House again, but that doesn't mean we have to sit back and be quiet while our Justice System is used as a political weapon by the Democrats.

 

[DW=HERO]

Heritage Foundation vs The WEF: Its between the Billionaires, real greaseball shit

 

[KnightTemplar]

Make America Germany Again.

Make Aryans Great Again!

 

[spamking]

This junk is as stupid as the current ATF thinking it has unlimited power to change legal definitions on a whim with pretty strong legal implications . . .

“The Mandate for Leadership” is a 920-page document that details how the next Republican administration will implement radical and sweeping changes to the entirety of government. This blueprint assumes that the next president will be able to rule by fiat under the $$ (which posits that the president has the power to control the entire federal executive branch). It is also based on the premise that the next president will implement Schedule F, which allows the president to fire any federal employee who has policy-making authority, and replace them with a presidential appointee who is not voted on in the Senate.

 

[RoastBeast]

Yet another backflip. No one even came close to stating that they're giving straight people a pass. They're emphasizing LGBTQ people by their own language, the main example they cited was LGBTQ, and the second quote mentioned sexuality as one of the protections from prosecution they specifically don't want. Race was another one but this thread isnt even about that.

It does not read that they are targeting "the porn industry" alone, if it did there would be no need to mention teachers and librarians. They are mentioned because they are at the center of the idea that they're turning kids gay and trans, and not only are you aware of that, you arent contesting it. This is calling for them to become registered sex offenders, which is asinine and absurd. There would be no need to threaten District Attorneys.

There's no fantasy, theres just people like you eother ignoring reality, or being honest about your enthusiasm, or at the very least tolerance for what these people want.

What did you mean when you said "Never mind the implication for straight people" then?

Listen, I don't agree with the shit in that paragraph either but I also don't take it very seriously. The people who wrote that paragraph are just as insane as the people who promote transgender ideology to children. They're all fucked in the head and they're all wrong. Problem is that the freaks who promote transgenderism to children are in charge and have the power right now. We need to stop voting for all of these idiots and bring common sense and decency back to schools.

 

[Deleted member 592570]

^^^^ This. I think they call anyone that opposes them a Trump supporter, as they can't see shades of gray.

Many Independents, Conservatives, Libertarians, and Republicans don't want to see Trump in the White House again, but that doesn't mean we have to sit back and be quiet while our Justice System is used as a political weapon by the Democrats.

And the irony is the Democrats have now set the precedent and they will be back here howling a screaming in a year or two when Biden gets indicted.