Prime Lennox vs Prime Tyson

Joe was a smart fighter, that's not the problem. Could he learn different techniques, yes he could. He already brought plenty to the table, power in both hands, great handspeed, near perfect fundamentals and his consistency. You don't go nearly 12 years as champ without some real discipline. He does have a few things working against him with modern heavies though, the size is one, the main one though, I keep saying is stylistic. He could adapt I suppose but he wouldn't be fighting sitting ducks.
I understand your point and with a,select few you may be right I just don't think Holmes is one of them . Holmes may move around a while and last but eventually that chins getting tested.

Also 12 years then was much different than now . They fought 5 to 6 times a year you maybe get 2 fights a year now on active years.
 
I understand your point and with a,select few you may be right I just don't think Holmes is one of them . Holmes may move around a while and last but eventually that chins getting tested.

Also 12 years then was much different than now . They fought 5 to 6 times a year you maybe get 2 fights a year now on active years.
Holmes had a good chin and great recuperative powers. Only peak Tyson kayoed him, the other times (Shavers,Snipes, Weaver I think) he got up to win. Joe had a great jab but Holmes had one, maybe not as powerful but fast and useful. Holmes was quite a fighter, I think he at least belongs in the top 3 of heavyweight champions. Joe would not beat Holmes by shuffling in, he might be able to catch him and hurt him as he came in to punch, then the question is, could he finish him. Holmes was a complete fighter, I never liked the man himself but I respect him.
 
i think lennox wins more often than not, largely because tyson was a bit inconsistent even at his absolute best. lennox also just matches up well with tyson, great legs, great timing, huge punch repertoire. make no mistake though, if rahman & mccall can catch lewis making a big mistake as far as footwork, tyson can too.

lennox was also almost surely in his prime in the early 90's not the late 90's. post-KO losses lewis was a lot smarter, but the athleticism and talent of younger lennox was scary.

Yeah I agree with all of this. Lewis is bad stylistically for Tyson and as you say, inconsistent. He’d beat him more often than not, I’d be fairly confident in that
 
Yeah I agree with all of this. Lewis is bad stylistically for Tyson and as you say, inconsistent. He’d beat him more often than not, I’d be fairly confident in that
Mike would always have a chance with Lennox's chin though, a chance at least. A bad chin is a big drawback for a heavyweight, Lewis probably has the worst chin of the elite heavyweights. Most of the others had reliable to great chins because that's what you have to have in that division.
 
Mike would always have a chance with Lennox's chin though, a chance at least. A bad chin is a big drawback for a heavyweight, Lewis probably has the worst chin of the elite heavyweights. Most of the others had reliable to great chins because that's what you have to have in that division.

I wouldn’t feel confident picking either guy over 1 fight, in their primes. Tyson had the ability and ferocity to beat anyone but I standby what I said. I dont necessarily disagree regards Lewis’s chin but we already know that Tyson can’t take Lewis’s power. Very few HWs could take either of these guys power. I think more often than not the fight looks similar to their actual fight. Tyson being very dangerous early and being target practice from the mid point onwards

I took about £500 off of mates of mine in this fight. Lots of British fight fans could never accept Lewis as a British fighter so hated him?? They were happy to take my bet and were betting with the emotions. It always looked like a bad match up to me for Mike but he was so far from the fighter he was that it just looked easy money, which I gladly took advantage of.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn’t feel confident picking either guy over 1 fight. Tyson had the ability and ferocity to beat anyone but I standby what I said. I dont necessarily disagree regards Lewis’s chin but we already know that Tyson can’t take lewus power. Very few HWs could take either of these guys power. I think more often than not the fight looks similar to their actual fight. Tyson being very dangerous early and being target practice from the mid point onwards
You're right, a puncher's chance usually isn't enough but it is there. When they did fight, Mike was broken mentally, I won't pretend he was the same guy who reigned terror on the division in the 80's. Remember the fights right after Lewis? He was losing to Danny Williams and Kevin McBride, he was done.
 
Mike would always have a chance with Lennox's chin though, a chance at least. A bad chin is a big drawback for a heavyweight, Lewis probably has the worst chin of the elite heavyweights. Most of the others had reliable to great chins because that's what you have to have in that division.
i would say lennox's chin was about average. there's plenty of big shots he got hit with that he took fine. it was when he made mistakes with his feet that he took ko shots. being as big as he was, he saw it fine to square his feet up and/or lean back far too often. holmes did this often too. that's something that can be exploited, i just don't see it coming from a much smaller heavyweight.
 
Holmes had a good chin and great recuperative powers. Only peak Tyson kayoed him, the other times (Shavers,Snipes, Weaver I think) he got up to win. Joe had a great jab but Holmes had one, maybe not as powerful but fast and useful. Holmes was quite a fighter, I think he at least belongs in the top 3 of heavyweight champions. Joe would not beat Holmes by shuffling in, he might be able to catch him and hurt him as he came in to punch, then the question is, could he finish him. Holmes was a complete fighter, I never liked the man himself but I respect him.
Can't agree on Holmes. Honestly wouldnt have him in my top 5 - that's Ali, Louis, Lewis, Tyson, and Foreman. For me. I might put Holmes in the 2nd line with Holyfield, Frazier, an the like.
 
i would say lennox's chin was about average. there's plenty of big shots he got hit with that he took fine. it was when he made mistakes with his feet that he took ko shots. being as big as he was, he saw it fine to square his feet up and/or lean back far too often. holmes did this often too. that's something that can be exploited, i just don't see it coming from a much smaller heavyweight.
Maybe average but not at the level of the others. Joe Frazier, Holmes, even Louis (who was knocked down about 11 times all together) and the rest could take a lot more before they hit the canvas and they'd get up to win much of the time. It was one punch that McCall landed on him, it's been awhile since I've seen the Rahman fight but I think it wasn't much different.
 
Can't agree on Holmes. Honestly wouldnt have him in my top 5 - that's Ali, Louis, Lewis, Tyson, and Foreman. For me. I might put Holmes in the 2nd line with Holyfield, Frazier, an the like.
I hated Holmes, never liked him but he was a great fighter. He dominated a maligned group of boxers and he came after Ali, he also ran his mouth so much that everyone hated him. Still, he was 6-3, 78 inch reach, good speed, decent pop in both hands, a jab comparable to anyone's as far as what he could do with it. I don't know if Tyson or Foreman or Lewis could handle him. they all hit harder for sure but that's about all they had on him. Foreman in the seventies was a beast, kind of like Liston, Lewis wasn't fast enough to beat Holmes and Tyson, I think Tyson gets tamed by that jab and the movement.

I don't know, you take all of these guys on their highlight reel nights and it's tough to see anyone winning. Holmes wasn't as exciting as most of the others but he was a solid champion with few weaknesses.
 
Maybe average but not at the level of the others. Joe Frazier, Holmes, even Louis (who was knocked down about 11 times all together) and the rest could take a lot more before they hit the canvas and they'd get up to win much of the time. It was one punch that McCall landed on him, it's been awhile since I've seen the Rahman fight but I think it wasn't much different.
rahman hits him with a shot that has him unsteady and he backs into a corner then eats a haymaker overhand right that shuts the lights out, if i recall correctly.
 
Bad fight for Mike although Lennox's chin issues give him a chance.

If it's Lennox post 1995 then it's Lennox.

Pre, Mike probably beats him as Lennox still was very flawed pre Steward
 
Here was the tale of the tape from their fight. Even if it isn't entirely accurate Mike had to give up a ridiculous amount of physical advantages in height, reach, and to a lesser but still significant extent weight.
stats.png

Most importantly Lewis actually knows how to use these advantages. He understands how to fight tall and be the bigger man in close. That's the difference. If Mike tried to explode inside then he'd be at risk of getting hurt even worse when he inevitably walks into a well-timed shot. I could see Lewis simply taking a half step back if necessary and countering him when he tried to close the gap with his speed.
 
Here was the tale of the tape from their fight. Even if it isn't entirely accurate Mike had to give up a ridiculous amount of physical advantages in height, reach, and to a lesser but still significant extent weight.
stats.png

Most importantly Lewis actually knows how to use these advantages. He understands how to fight tall and be the bigger man in close. That's the difference. If Mike tried to explode inside then he'd be at risk of getting hurt even worse when he inevitably walks into a well-timed shot. I could see Lewis simply taking a half step back if necessary and countering him when he tried to close the gap with his speed.
He really, really did. Not long ago, on facebook, there was a recent pic of Bruno, Tyson and Lewis all standing together and Lewis looked like he towered over both. Supposedly only 6-5 but he looked even bigger in that pic.
As for Mike, he really did have a lot going for him, that speed, great power, bad intentions and a granite chin. The reach/height was still a fatal flaw for him though. George Foreman had a theory that Mike was great so long as he fought at one pace, and that if he lost even a little bit of that he would fall apart. That's George's typically obtuse way of wording things but he may have been on to something.

I always thought Mike limited himself by only fighting well at that one pace, never learned to throw punches at 80% like most fighters and conserve energy while he did his work, rarely threw more than 50 punches a round because of that. He also never maximized his great leg speed or relied much on his jab. He basically turned out to be a mid range fighter, a guy who does his best work on the way in, not outside, not inside because he was too short to land outside and he'd get smothered on the inside.

I'm gonna watch the Lewis fight now.
 
Here was the tale of the tape from their fight. Even if it isn't entirely accurate Mike had to give up a ridiculous amount of physical advantages in height, reach, and to a lesser but still significant extent weight.
stats.png

Most importantly Lewis actually knows how to use these advantages. He understands how to fight tall and be the bigger man in close. That's the difference. If Mike tried to explode inside then he'd be at risk of getting hurt even worse when he inevitably walks into a well-timed shot. I could see Lewis simply taking a half step back if necessary and countering him when he tried to close the gap with his speed.

Yeah I tend to think that fight would be closer if Tyson was nearer his prime but Lewis still wins 8 out of 10. The combination of skill, height and reach would have always been too much for Tyson I reckon.
 
Yeah I tend to think that fight would be closer if Tyson was nearer his prime but Lewis still wins 8 out of 10. The combination of skill, height and reach would have always been too much for Tyson I reckon.
I just rewatched it for the first time in years. Mike only won the first round and got worse every round from there. He still had some ok defense and movement but he would not fight inside at all, he did more punching inside young and his accuracy just wasn't there at all. The younger mike would throw more inside and land more on the way in, who knows if that would be enough to kayo Lewis. Mike also had lost a couple fights by brutal kayo before this and you can see him realizing it was coming again, the young mike didn't have that trauma. Still not sure who I'd pick, Lewis was smart about protecting his chin most of the time and he was a big puncher, especially with that right. He wasn't that fast with his hands or feet but he was still able to dodge the much faster Tyson's lunges in this fight.
 
I just rewatched it for the first time in years. Mike only won the first round and got worse every round from there. He still had some ok defense and movement but he would not fight inside at all, he did more punching inside young and his accuracy just wasn't there at all. The younger mike would throw more inside and land more on the way in, who knows if that would be enough to kayo Lewis. Mike also had lost a couple fights by brutal kayo before this and you can see him realizing it was coming again, the young mike didn't have that trauma. Still not sure who I'd pick, Lewis was smart about protecting his chin most of the time and he was a big puncher, especially with that right. He wasn't that fast with his hands or feet but he was still able to dodge the much faster Tyson's lunges in this fight.
Lewis didn't really allow Mike to open up much when he got inside. He would either quickly tie him up, time him with a counter when he stepped in, or step back and counter. Notice that when he did get inside and Lewis clinched him he simply pushed Mike out of the pocket. He did this a lot in the fight. As a result Mike had to start over again whether the ref broke them or not. Intelligent tactics by Lewis.

Mike's approach was all wrong. What he needed to do was actually work behind an educated jab to the body. Aim for the chest to push Lewis back when he closed distance and then immediately come over the top with a follow-up shot upstairs on the entry. With Lewis momentarily off balance and being driven backwards he wouldn't have been able to readily clinch/smother or counter Mike with power when he initially stepped in.
 
Tyson is a small HW with a style that’s tailor-made to beat taller guys. Unfortunately for him, Lewis is a big HW with a style that’s tailor-made to beat shorter guys.

He’s also all wrong for Tyson. One weakness Mike has always had, even in his prime, is that once a much taller guy has wrapped both his arms around him, he can no longer move and has to wait for the ref to beak it up. That’s why Tucker survived all 12 rounds and why Ribalta almost survived all 10.
 
Lewis didn't really allow Mike to open up much when he got inside. He would either quickly tie him up, time him with a counter when he stepped in, or step back and counter. Notice that when he did get inside and Lewis clinched him he simply pushed Mike out of the pocket. He did this a lot in the fight. As a result Mike had to start over again whether the ref broke them or not. Intelligent tactics by Lewis.

Mike's approach was all wrong. What he needed to do was actually work behind an educated jab to the body. Aim for the chest to push Lewis back when he closed distance and then immediately come over the top with a follow-up shot upstairs on the entry. With Lewis momentarily off balance and being driven backwards he wouldn't have been able to readily clinch/smother or counter Mike with power when he initially stepped in.
There were times when Lennox wasn't tying him up and Mike still didn't punch inside. When Mike was young, he'd throw those body shots, uppercuts and hooks in close like that. What is surprising though is that Lennox could stay far enough away from Mike even with his slower foot speed. Mike did plenty of charging and lennox either smothered him or stepped back, giving Mike nothing to hit. I think Mike may have landed one decent punch the whole fight. Most of his big punches missed by a mile. He was still capable of the kayo in those years, he had a true one punch kayo against botha and had busted Golota's face, Lewis was just to smart to get hit.
 
Back
Top