well, my point was that ridiculous matchups happen for the sake of keeping the game going, and we should accept the bad with the good, if the bad helps pay to keep giving us more good. i accept Chael v Jones. it's ridiculous, but Fox needs ROI on their $100m/yr. just like i accepted Giant Silva, which was catering to some specific Japanese markets.
but to suggest Chael v Jones is somewhat legit....meh, let's just agree to disagree. i think it's NOT, and yet accept it at face value. if it pays for the rest of the free MMA i get, i will watch it twice.
but boy, we sure strayed from the topic. Pride was awesome
and
TS should compare the 2000 GP to UFC 24, not UFC 100. and THEN complain that watching Coleman destroy wasn't nearly as good as epic UFC battles like Lance Gibson v Jermaine Andre, Shonie Carter v Brad Gumm and Scott Adams v Ian Freeman