- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 37,108
- Reaction score
- 28,880
Last time I went to England was around 2006, and I believe it was 2:1 in favor of the pound. It was a costly trip.
Last time I went to England was around 2006, and I believe it was 2:1 in favor of the pound. It was a costly trip.
Yeah, it has made it much easier for people to whine about decisions.
If they're going to introduce technology like this for the media, I wouldn't have a problem if refs were allowed to review goal scoring plays.
The problem is they're only giving big clubs forwards the benefit of the doubt consistently
Last time I went to England was around 2006, and I believe it was 2:1 in favor of the pound. It was a costly trip.
England,the Scots wanted no part of it,they've just been dragged along.*Britain
I think goal line tech has improved things. So long has there is a strict set of guidelines for the reviews, I'd be onboard......which opens up another set of problems, too.
Almost an unsolvable problem, really.
There's some credence to what you've posted before about bigger clubs usually attacking more, ergo invoking a proportional law of averages situ etc but i'm not convinced your lot are creating that much more than the midtable sides, currently.Not true, but heh ho.
There was a time we had a 2:1 advantage on the Aussie dollar, but I wasn't able to make the trip at the time.Going to America was f'n GREAT. Could live like a king. Anytime a friend went out there, I'd give them some money for clothes. Especially before online shopping was a thing. Karl Kani this, Tommy Hilfiger that...
like I said,opposite for me,even finding a shop with mint aeros and galaxy ripples double the price wasn't a deal breaker because of the strength of the £ and the ghastliness of Hersey's chocolate.Last time I went to England was around 2006, and I believe it was 2:1 in favor of the pound. It was a costly trip.
It's also worth mentioning that people tend to focus way more on decisions that favor big sides and ignore the ones against them. United got some pretty shit calls early in the season, which seem to go unmentioned in comparison to their streak of offside goals.There's some credence to what you've posted before about bigger clubs usually attacking more, ergo invoking the law of averages etc but i'm not convinced your lot are creating that much more than the midtable sides, currently.
Lets keep a rough tally itt here on out & we can start to apply real time context.
There's some credence to what you've posted before about bigger clubs usually attacking more, ergo invoking a proportional law of averages situ etc but i'm not convinced your lot are creating that much more than the midtable sides, currently.
Pool(yeah, i know they're in top 4 currently) created more chances than you other day despite playing away & having less possession.
Lets keep a rough tally itt here on out & we can start to apply some real time context.
England,the Scots wanted no part of it,they've just been dragged along.
It's also worth mentioning that people tend to focus way more on decisions that favor big sides and ignore the ones against them. United got some pretty shit calls early in the season, which seem to go unmentioned in comparison to their streak of offside goals.
Must.Resist.Clickbait.