Possible Sasquatch encounter happened last night.

[franklinstower]

If you actually saw someone throwing boulders are you sure, lethal force would be something you might be able to use in the right circumstances. In a situation where you just have rocks falling down a hill with no proper identification of someone with lethal intent or if someone is even the cause of the rocks that are being "thrown" down a STEEP hill where things have a tendency to tumble down then it's stupid and ignorant to start blasting away in into the dark. It's hysterical bitch shit.

So rocks fall down a hill in a rainbow arch over your head now huh? You are the one being foolish at this point and making wild assumptions without evidence.

 

[DoomPatrol]

So rocks fall down a hill in a rsinbow arch over your head now huh? You are the one being foolish at this point and making wild assumptions without evidence.

I'm guessing someone doesn't understand how forward momentum and gravity works now huh? You seriously are going to make the claim that the guy making reasonable assumptions using well established physics and logic is more ridiculous than the guy who saw rocks falling down a hill and assumed it was a Bigfoot that needed to be shot? Let's not question the reliability of a hysterical pussy's testimony at all. Let's just assume everything he said is exactly how it happened because eyewitness testimonies from frightened man-children are always accurate and without exaggeration. Especially on the internet.

 

[BearGrounds]

One doesn't need tangible in-hand physical evidence to formulate theories? Oh good...

In other news the Loch Ness monster prefers to hunt for burritos solo, but probably enjoys sharing them with his fish friends.

In other news the Flying Spaghetti monster prefers to fly faster around Jupiter because he is afraid of becoming more stupider the longer he stays in close proximity.

In other news @BearGrounds loves to suck on giant dirty penises that still smell like his butthole.

I love this idea of not requiring tangible evidence for theories! Science should really follow suit with this line of believing whatever is convenient despite tangible proof.

I love how absolutely gotten to you are by me and my Sasquatch knowledge. Remember the last time when I had your bitchass following me into other threads like an attention starved puppy? I do, and this is fixing to be another one of those times.

Best you step away from the keyboard and go for a walk instead, otherwise you'll be thinking about me all day and losing sleep again like you did the last time.

 

[franklinstower]

One doesn't need tangible in-hand physical evidence to formulate theories? Oh good...

In other news the Loch Ness monster prefers to hunt for burritos solo, but probably enjoys sharing them with his fish friends.

In other news the Flying Spaghetti monster prefers to fly faster around Jupiter because he is afraid of becoming more stupider the longer he stays in close proximity.

In other news @BearGrounds loves to suck on giant dirty penises that still smell like his butthole.

I love this idea of not requiring tangible evidence for theories! Science should really follow suit with this line of believing whatever is convenient despite tangible proof.

The possibility to believe your assertions here are low. There is just one misersble asshole making the claim in this case (you dummy).. Now if multiple people across rime disconnected from one another started coming foreward making similar claims then there would be reason to take the accounts seriously.

Duh.

 

[DoomPatrol]

I love how absolutely gotten to you are by me and my Sasquatch knowledge. Remember the last time when I had your bitchass following me into other threads like an attention starved puppy? I do, and this is fixing to be another one of those times.

Best you step away from the keyboard and go for a walk instead, otherwise you'll be thinking about me all day and losing sleep again like you did the last time.

I don't remember you because you aren't worth remembering in my life. I'm glad I'm such a big deal to you though.

IN OTHER NEWS, theories suggest @BearGrounds likes to diddle little kids. Is there tangible evidence? No, but we dont need that shit according to @BearGrounds!

 

[franklinstower]

I'm guessing someone doesn't understand how forward momentum and gravity works now huh? You seriously are going to make the claim that the guy making reasonable assumptions using well established physics and logic is more ridiculous than the guy who saw rocks falling down a hill and assumed it was a Bigfoot that needed to be shot? Let's not question the reliability of a hysterical pussy's testimony at all. Let's just assume everything he said is exactly how it happened because eyewitness testimonies from frightened man-children are always accurate and without exaggeration. Especially on the internet.

Your assertions are not reasonable though. Eocks done roll down hills (was there even a suitable hill here?) And the go up a natural ramp and then fly over peolles heads ina rainbow arch dummy.

This is are similar to when you said there is no need for self defence if someone is hurling large heavy rocks at your head.


Obviously the more likely scenario is an exceptionaly large and powerful man was throwing the rocks and that using a gun was justified but you prefer magic rocks that "fall" upward....

 

[DoomPatrol]

The possibility to believe your assertions here are low. There is just one misersble asshole making the claim in this case (you dummy).. Now if multiple people across rime disconnected from one another started coming foreward making similar claims then there would be reason to take the accounts seriously.

Duh.

In other news, theories suggest that @franklinstower and @BearGrounds are involved in a sexual relationship.

 

[franklinstower]

In other news, theories suggest that @franklinstower and @BearGrounds are involved in a sexual relationship.

Reduced to nonsense I see. Sad.

Tell us again why shooting at an assailant in the dark in the woods is the same as randomly firing a gun in a hotel......

 

[DoomPatrol]

Your assertions are not reasonable though. Eocks done roll down hills (was there even a suitable hill here?) And the go up a natural ramp and then fly over peolles heads ina rainbow arch dummy.

This is are similar to when you said there is no need for self defence if someone is hurling large heavy rocks at your head.


Obviously the more likely scenario is an exceptionaly large and powerful man was throwing the rocks and that using a gun was justified but you prefer magic rocks that "fall" upward....

He made it very clear that it was a steep rocky hill. Rocks fall all the fucking time in nature in rocky, hilly terrain. Everything from animal traffic to weather can cause things to come loose and eventually crash down. Rocks also do this thing called bouncing. There are plenty of natural and reasonable conditions that would explain rocks falling. There's also plenty to suggest that his description of basketball sized rocks hurled into a rainbow above his head might not be an entirely accurate assessment of the situation. Absolutely nothing happened that makes Bigfoot a more reasonable thought than gravity and natural phenomena.

The big thing you continue to miss is the fact that there IS NO SOMEONE in this whole rocks thing. He never saw any personal or animal throwing shit. He heard rocks coming down and off a steep hill. He would have to be firing blindly into the woods to react to that situation because he didn't identify anyone with lethal intent or behaving in a grossly negligent fashion to endanger his life. It's as silly as me going through the woods at night and having a tree fall near me so I start blasting away in that direction assuming it's lumberjacks trying to crush my head instead of just a tree falling.

This thread started with nonsense from post fucking 1 and you continued the nonsense to page 5. There is no assailant to shoot at that he identified. If there was one that he could identify, I would be of a different opinion. Although ironically military and police are usually not allowed to fire upon protesters throwing rocks. I've had plenty of them thrown at me in Ramadi when I was a gunner on a truck. Never blasted those kids for slinging rocks at me. But I guess I don't know what it's like to be a target of rock throwing despite being a target of rock throwing.

 

[BearGrounds]

I don't remember you because you aren't worth remembering in my life. I'm glad I'm such a big deal to you though.

IN OTHER NEWS, theories suggest @BearGrounds likes to diddle little kids. Is there tangible evidence? No, but we dont need that shit according to @BearGrounds!

LOL.



It must hurt inside that you've got to tell obvious lies in an attempt to salvage your ego. We both know that I currently (and seemingly always will) own real estate inside that bitchass dome of yours.

 

[franklinstower]

He made it very clear that it was a steep rocky hill. Rocks fall all the fucking time in nature in rocky, hilly terrain. Everything from animal traffic to weather can cause things to come loose and eventually crash down. Rocks also do this thing called bouncing. There are plenty of natural and reasonable conditions that would explain rocks falling. There's also plenty to suggest that his description of basketball sized rocks hurled into a rainbow above his head might not be an entirely accurate assessment of the situation. Absolutely nothing happened that makes Bigfoot a more reasonable thought than gravity and natural phenomena.

The big thing you continue to miss is the fact that there IS NO SOMEONE in this whole rocks thing. He never saw any personal or animal throwing shit. He heard rocks coming down and off a steep hill. He would have to be firing blindly into the woods to react to that situation because he didn't identify anyone with lethal intent or behaving in a grossly negligent fashion to endanger his life. It's as silly as me going through the woods at night and having a tree fall near me so I start blasting away in that direction assuming it's lumberjacks trying to crush my head instead of just a tree falling.

Rocks fall in a rainbow arch over your head? Ok dummy.

 

[Medulla Omoplata]

I liked OP's story

 

[TheNinja]

Your assertions are not reasonable though. Eocks done roll down hills (was there even a suitable hill here?) And the go up a natural ramp and then fly over peolles heads ina rainbow arch dummy.

This is are similar to when you said there is no need for self defence if someone is hurling large heavy rocks at your head.


Obviously the more likely scenario is an exceptionaly large and powerful man was throwing the rocks and that using a gun was justified but you prefer magic rocks that "fall" upward....

My argument isn’t against the use of a gun. My argument is that you can’t just fire blindly into the bushes. IF he saw a target throwing the rocks then absolutely he can defend his life. But discharging his firearm bc rocks were flying around him? I can’t get on board with that.

Though I don’t know how close the rocks actually were. Are we talking 20 feet warnings ? Or we talking 3 feet away actually trying to hit him ?

 

[DoomPatrol]

LOL.



It must hurt inside that you've got to tell obvious lies in an attempt to salvage your ego. We both know that I currently (and seemingly always will) own real estate inside that bitchass dome of yours.

Oh buddy. The only real estate you'll occupy is that Section 8 housing you live in with your sister-wife. You aren't important in my life, but I'll keep you on that forum retard list I maintain.

Rocks fall in a rainbow arch over your head? Ok dummy.

Again, I guess someone didn't ever get to this thing called physics in school to learn projectile motion and gravity. If something rolls off a ledge with forward motion, guess what that trajectory looks like?

I'm glad you at least aren't dumb enough to continue to argue the insane idea that blind firing a weapon into the woods is a good idea.

 

[franklinstower]

My argument isn’t against the use of a gun. My argument is that you can’t just fire blindly into the bushes. IF he saw a target throwing the rocks then absolutely he can defend his life. But discharging his firearm bc rocks were flying around him? I can’t get on board with that.

Though I don’t know how close the rocks actually were. Are we talking 20 feet warnings ? Or we talking 3 feet away actually trying to hit him ?

We only have his story to go on. We cannot go making up alternative facts.. The rocks were flying over and near his head. You can shoot into a hill....... at whoever is doing that.

Thats where you fire guns for safety BTW, into hills.....

Its like you guys have never been to the woods or something.

 

[BearGrounds]

Reduced to nonsense I see. Sad.

Tell us again why shooting at an assailant in the dark in the woods is the same as randomly firing a gun in a hotel......

Lol it happens to him every time. The frustration of having his condescension backfire upon him overwhelms him to the point that he becomes reduced to a triggered little baby spouting mindless insults.

Oh buddy. The only real estate you'll occupy is that Section 8 housing you live in with your sister-wife. You aren't important in my life, but I'll keep you on that forum retard list I maintain.

And the flailing continues....

 

[franklinstower]

Oh buddy. The only real estate you'll occupy is that Section 8 housing you live in with your sister-wife. You aren't important in my life, but I'll keep you on that forum retard list I maintain.



Again, I guess someone didn't ever get to this thing called physics in school to learn projectile motion and gravity. If something rolls off a ledge with forward motion, guess what that trajectory looks like?

I'm glad you at least aren't dumb enough to continue to argue the insane idea that blind firing a weapon into the woods is a good idea.

It doesn't look like a rainbow arch over your head that is for sure.

You are using alternative facts. Not surprised. Sad.......

 

[franklinstower]

Lol it happens to him every time. The frustration of having his condescension backfire upon him overwhelms him to the point that he becomes reduced to a triggered little baby spouting mindless insults.




And the flailing continues....

Its pathetic.

 

[Medulla Omoplata]

I wanna buy a gun next year.

 

[DoomPatrol]

We only have his story ro go on. We canot go making up alternative facts.. The rocks were flying over and near his head. You can shoot into a hill....... at whoever is doing that.

Thats where you fire guns for safety BTW, into hills.....

Its like you guys have never been to the woods or something.

There are no facts. There is only testimony, and that can absolutely be scrutinized. I haven't made up a single alternative fact. I've posited reasonable alternative explanations for why he might have seen what he claims to have witnessed.

It's funny you talk about making up facts when you end your post with a hard statement "whoever is doing that". That's an alternative fact. He never saw anyone or anything causing rocks to fall near him. He did however say there was a steep rocky hill. We do however know there's a thing called gravity and another thing called momentum. We do however know that rocks come loose and things like gravity and momentum cause them to fall. We do know through the science of projectile motion that objects in a free fall that have forward motion will fall in an arc, very much like what a rainbow looks like.

It's like you've never studied science or something. It's also like you've never heard of gun safety rules like "know you're target and what lies beyond". People use hills as a backstop on rifle ranges because they both know there is nobody innocent on that hill and they are shooting into targets using a known backstop that's safe. They don't just shoot up into hills with no clue what they are firing at because that's not responsible.